C.S. Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 I can sorta see why Taz got offended by the last question, but Wade is not wrong...not at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidebottom Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 I can sorta see why Taz got offended by the last question, but Wade is not wrong...not at all. About what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted July 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 Yeah, Wade was right on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMick Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 I can sorta see why Taz got offended by the last question, but Wade is not wrong...not at all. About what? Yeah, I think a copy and paste got lost somewhere here and I'm curious too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidebottom Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 PWO's very own whodunnit... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted July 22, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 Wade is right about the ECW nostalgia stuff. Look in the spoiler tag on Page 20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.S. Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 I can sorta see why Taz got offended by the last question, but Wade is not wrong...not at all. About what? Yeah, I think a copy and paste got lost somewhere here and I'm curious too Can't actually cut and paste this, so I'll link to the post. Click on the "spoiler." I was referring to Wade's last question asking whether Taz got a raise, etc. http://prowrestlingonly.com/index.php?/topic/4999-the-wade-keller-appreciation-thread/page-20&do=findComment&comment=5614004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidebottom Posted July 22, 2014 Report Share Posted July 22, 2014 Ah I see now. Quite the little read too. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazer Posted July 23, 2014 Report Share Posted July 23, 2014 Ah I see now. Quite the little read too. Thanks. HELL of a read. Some nice give and take for awhile before Taz decided to take his ball and go home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artDDP Posted July 27, 2014 Report Share Posted July 27, 2014 Loss and I bantered about this on Twitter: If ECW was such a hot product why didn't it draw fifteen years ago? How many ECW fans refuse to acknowledge that the promotion and Paul Heyman were largely propped up by Vince McMahon after trying to go national? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goc Posted July 27, 2014 Report Share Posted July 27, 2014 It DID draw. Look at the crowds they had. It just didn't draw on a level that could match their spending. It was drawing like a territory and they wanted to be a national promotion. Or had to be a national promotion to keep their talent from going to WWF or WCW. They pretty much were screwed once WCW and WWF got hot. I don't see any way they could have kept things hot after 1998 once there was money for the wrestlers to be made elsewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted July 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2014 I think my point is that most of the people who chant for ECW at shows did not watch ECW when it was around, which I think is on the hypocritical side. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dooley Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 Loss and I bantered about this on Twitter: If ECW was such a hot product why didn't it draw fifteen years ago? How many ECW fans refuse to acknowledge that the promotion and Paul Heyman were largely propped up by Vince McMahon after trying to go national? Giving Heyman $50K a year or whatever it was isn't propping up all that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cm funk Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 I think my point is that most of the people who chant for ECW at shows did not watch ECW when it was around, which I think is on the hypocritical side. How many people still chant ECW at shows? I haven't heard it on WWE tv in years. Maybe in TNA when they're doing ECW tributes and begging for that response? Does it happen on indy shows still? I would guess the majority at a wrestling show who chants E-C-DUB is a fan of ECW. How is that "hypocritical"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eduardo James Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 I would guess the majority at a wrestling show who chants E-C-DUB is a fan of ECW. How is that "hypocritical"? Honestly, an argument over this is going to be pointless since there's no way to tell for sure what each and individual person is chanting for. Personally, most ECW chants post-closing came across as "ECW = Hardcore, right? ECDUB ECUB" and if you were to ask that person afterwards what their favorite ECW match or moment was, you'd probably get a shrug. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chief Posted July 28, 2014 Report Share Posted July 28, 2014 There was actually an ECW chant on Raw during an RVD match not too long ago. Haven't heard one of those in ages. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdw Posted July 29, 2014 Report Share Posted July 29, 2014 It DID draw. Look at the crowds they had. It just didn't draw on a level that could match their spending. It was drawing like a territory and they wanted to be a national promotion. It didn't draw like a territory. Territories that drew at the levels of ECW were in their death spirals. We talk about Portland being a "small" territory. But I suspect Bix and/or Dylan could point to them out drawing ECW Arena. ECW was largely drawing like an Indy Plus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artDDP Posted July 29, 2014 Report Share Posted July 29, 2014 According to one of the newsletters (can't remember if it was Bryan's or Dave's) the ECW nostalgia segments ran off viewers on the first night of "Impact!" from New York. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artDDP Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 Does Wade even break news anymore? I've been subscribing to the Torch VIP site since August and it seems everything is just Wade reporting other sites' news and uploading hours of audio of him and his staff commenting on WWE angles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillThompson Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 From what I understand he has no more sources. Because of that he mainly does just report news from others and has turned the site into more of an analysis machine than a reporting site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WashingtonFB Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 Keller is tearing Steph a new one over this tweet. I cannot fathom why she would even consider tweeting this hours before Connor's induction. stephmcmahon: "philanthropy is the future of marketing, it's the way brands r going 2 win" -@biz Stone co-founder @twitter #WWEBPS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.S. Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 Keller is tearing Steph a new one over this tweet. I cannot fathom why she would even consider tweeting this hours before Connor's induction. stephmcmahon: "philanthropy is the future of marketing, it's the way brands r going 2 win" -@biz Stone co-founder @twitter #WWEBPS What does philanthropy have to do with Connor's induction? They're two totally different things. Being a philanthropist generally means donating money to good causes. The Connor and Make-a-Wish stuff is something else entirely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Thread Killer Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 What's the big deal? Speaking as somebody with a background in charitable fund development myself, I have zero problem with that quote. Philanthropy is marketing, and everbody knows that. Charities aren't stupid, they know that corporations donate money and get behind campaigns for tax breaks, for good publicity, and maybe as a distant third (depending on the corporation in question) to do something good or for personal reasons. (Like an owner or board member affected by the cause, etc.) I have never worked with a charity that had a problem publicizing a company or brand once they had agreed to take a charitable donation. I have worked for charities who turned down money from companies that they did not want to be identified with. In my experience, individuals tend to give money for purely altrusitic reasons. Corporations, not so much...they want something in return for their money, and if it is marketing, so be it. It's a win-win. Keller picks odd things to get offended by. Of all things WWE does or has done to get his shorts in a twist over, this hardly seems to be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheapshot Posted March 28, 2015 Report Share Posted March 28, 2015 A click bait machine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoo Enthusiast Posted March 29, 2015 Report Share Posted March 29, 2015 Everything WWE does is fair game for Wade to be outraged about. He is one of the professionally offended. Now he will do a week's worth of audio on the topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.