I want to add a lot more later but am rushed for time.
I watched Wargames 92 last night in preparation for Wargames 94 which I hope to see later this week. I agree about the Wargames 92 > Flair/Steamboat but then again, most of the Flair stuff just doesn't hold up very well.
You can compare any wrestling match. The only criteria is that the match is worked. If it is a shoot, then you can't.
To come up with a Top 5 Matches of 2004, I had to take into consideration the following matches:
Kawada/Hashimoto (2/22)
Danielson/Homicide (4/24)
JBL/Eddy (5/16)
Tamura/Ito (8/18)
Danielson/Joe (10/2)
Punk/Joe (10/16)
The first is a Japanese heavyweight match. The second is a heel vs. face US match. The third in a WWE main event style match. The fourth is a shoot style match. The fifth is a US heavyweight match. Same with the sixth. Regardless of styles, they can all be compared.
It is easier to compare two matches with a similiar style or gimmick but that doesn't mean you can't compare two complete opposites.
1988 is an example of two matches at different ends of the spectrum. Takada/Yamazaki from 8/13 and Jumbo/Tenyru from 10/22. Both MOTYC. But which is better? Only way to find out it to compare and since they both instill the basic fundamentals of pro wrestling, it can be done even though one is based in a shoot style and one is based in a traditional Japanese heavyweight style.
Oh and I agree that Wargames 92 BLOWS AWAY every HIAC.
Tim