sek69 Posted September 20, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Mae wasn't bad looking in her prime, which unfortunately was about 60 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mike Campbell Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 I wouldn't mind seeing Moolah and Mae, if they were used in serious, and TASTEFUL roles, but we know that will never happen. Even just something like Moolah cutting a quick promo putting over Trish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MJHimJfadeaway23 Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Hold on here. It doesn't say that they'll be WRESTLING. WWE has a long, long history with USA, and if they bring back some '80s talent as a retrospective, what's so offensive about that? Basically. I don't see the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted September 20, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 One problem that leaps to mind is they're billing this as a RAW homecoming, and RAW didn't begin till 1993. I don't think anyone they're inviting ever had anything more than a cameo on RAW when it was on USA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted September 21, 2005 Report Share Posted September 21, 2005 One problem that leaps to mind is they're billing this as a RAW homecoming, and RAW didn't begin till 1993. I don't think anyone they're inviting ever had anything more than a cameo on RAW when it was on USA. In fairness to them, they actually are saying "WWE Homecoming". Never once heard them say "RAW Homecoming". They're just using the big return to USA as a reason for the return of the older workers. Of course, they're simply hoping to cash in big on ratings. I'm very interested to see if they succeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts