Guest The Original HTQ Posted November 10, 2006 Report Share Posted November 10, 2006 WWE hasn't been putting out a whole lot of quality programming lately, not that quality has ever been their primary goal. Some have been calling 2006 one of the worst years in a long time, and have even compared it to the dark days of 2002. Since the start of the millennium, which year do you think has been the worst from WWE from a quality standpoint? Quality can mean great matches, strong angles or compelling storylines. Whatever criteria you use, what year do you think was the WWE's worst so far this millennium? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted November 10, 2006 Report Share Posted November 10, 2006 2003 was easily the most uneventful with the least amount of good. Highlights of the year include HHH/Nash, HHH/Steiner, Goldberg having a horrible run, a Test/Scott Steiner feud, Vince going over Zach Gowen, Stephanie McMahon and the Undertaker in PPV main events, Mr. America, Jim Ross getting set on fire, Sable getting a disproportionate amount of television time, the Miller Lite Girls and the killing off of Booker T and Chris Jericho on the big stage. There were a few good matches scattered here and there, but it was easily my least favorite year of the new millenium for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts