dawho5 Posted April 12, 2015 Report Share Posted April 12, 2015 My guess is he'd be fine. As long as people get the idea of what you're talking about it's usually okay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackwebb Posted April 12, 2015 Report Share Posted April 12, 2015 I don't like to watch matches a second time very often. My memory has a tendency to exaggerate things over time. Making it harder for stuff I loved to live up to the memory. So if I do watch something again I prefer to do it immediately. So I like reading posts here for when you talk about things I haven't watched. That will sometimes get me to go and watch it. It also increases the chances of me enjoying it without having the in the moment context. Which I think wrestling needs. Knowing who wins and who losses a match impacts my enjoyment negatively a bit. The cerebral breakdown of a match I find here fills in that gap. I do find it interesting when you guys have a much different opinion of a match than how I remember it. After reading posts here for years I have a good idea of who I agree with usually based on conversations of the modern product. So I know if they rate something highly that I remember not being that good chances are good I will enjoy it if I go back and watch it. So far I have decided to stick with avoiding that though. Still plenty of stuff to see for the first time. So although I don't participate in the discussion much when it comes to stuff I have seen I prefer reading about it here over watching it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.