This is a good point, and ties into my belief that psychology in wrestling needs to be well defined, otherwise there's no limit to what the viewer can infer from a match. Many "meaningless" spots can be made into meaningful spots, but it's doubtful that the wrestlers are actually going for that sort of meaning. For example, I saw Koshinaka vs. Chono from the 1995 G1 today, which had Koshinaka jumping Chono before the bell and hitting some moves. A few minutes later, it slowed down and Chono used a halfcrab. One could say "The halfcrab is a brilliant spot, since Chono wants to slow the match down after Koshinaka's fast start". But really, did this spot realistically have that meaning, when the "Chono wants to slow it down" story wasn't actually played up in any other way? But I've seen attempts to single out certain spots and try to give them meaning, when the story isn't played up in any other way. It just can't work that way, otherwise there's no end to it.