Grimmas

Discuss here.

Exactly.

The purpose it to promote discussion and to re-evaluate. Anyone getting a vote should at least have some discussion on there matches. Also, it means that that footage must exist to be nominated. I am completely on board with the discussion/need for video. Just limiting it to matches reviewed here is the part I was concerned with. The discussion will obviously happen once their nominated, and if there is no video available, then eliminate them. I say let the discussion be fresh and with our purpose in mind, not using someone else's/your own older out of context opinions for a starting point. Again, just my two cents. The three reviews can be done by yourself anywhere on the board. If you feel someone should be nominated, but nobody has looked at him. Cue up youtube, watch three matches and right something about them. Then nominate them. Yes, Parv, I meant three reviews on PWO anywhere. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

Peak vs. longevity. Amount of great matches vs. great performances. Consistency vs. best stuff. How much does charisma play in. and so on... There are so many ways to think about the greatest wrestler ever. A lot of this is personal. How are people looking at this?

We can vote to expand the top 25 to top 100. I'm open to that. Even 50.

Jerry Lawler http://prowrestlingonly.com/index.php?/topic/19208-jerry-lawler/ Dustin Rhodes http://prowrestlingonly.com/index.php?/topic/21539-dustin-rhodes/ Buddy Rose http://prowrestlingonly.com/index.php?/topic/15074-buddy-rose/ Hulk Hogan http://prowrestlingonly.com/index.php?/topic/16319-hulk-hogans-best-matches/ Greg Valentine http://prowrestlingonly.com/index.php?/topic/18088-greg-valentine/

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

The purpose it to promote discussion and to re-evaluate. Anyone getting a vote should at least have some discussion on there matches. Also, it means that that footage must exist to be nominated.

Define obvious. Anyone who finished in the top 25 last time is how I defined it, and it is waived for them.

The purpose of the three matches is so that everybody that can be voted for has been viewed and discussed. That is fair. This project is to promote discussion and to re-evaluate. Lucky Charles has tagged most things, so a simple search should easily reveal results. Especially with the microscope and the match discussion archives available here.

If you would consider voting for them, nominate them.

I think you vote on historical important and whatever you feel makes a great match. How much it drew should be the only thing thrown out. However, if somebody wants to argue this particular match is historical significance based on how much it drew, that is their prerogative.

Here are the rules for the poll. 1) The ballot is due the day of WrestleMania 32. 2) The nomination process will end on March 1, 2016. 3) You can only vote for nominated wrestlers. See nomination process. 4) The ballot will consist of 100 wrestlers (this may be negotiated to 50 or 100). Tag team Rules: 1) The ballot is due the day of WrestleMania 32. 2) The nomination process will end on March 1, 2016. 3) You can only vote for nominated tag teams. See nomination process. 4) The ballot will consist of 25 tag teams. 5) Tag Team ballot is optional.

Post your nominee here. Make sure they either finished in the top 25 in the last poll or that you have the links to their 3 reviewed matches on prowrestlingonly.

The nomination process is real easy. 1) Determine who you want to nominate. 2) Find 3 reviewed matches of their's on prowrestlongly.com or reviews that you did on other sites. 3) Post the nominee and links to the three matches in the nomination thread. 4) Shortly after a the nominee's discussion thread will appear in the nominees forum. From there you are free to go to the nominees forum to make your case. Note: If someone finished in the top 25 in the last poll, then they are eligible to be nominated without the 3 reviewed matches. Note 2: If someone was heavily featured in the 80's project, the review process can be waved.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.