The Thread Killer Posted March 31, 2015 Report Posted March 31, 2015 So I saw WrestleMania and was intrigued enough to the point where I would consider watching WWE again to see if they can build on what they did there. Back when I followed the product, RAW and Smackdown were almost separate entities with their own World titles and different rosters. I know that is a thing of the past now. Here is my question... Is Smackdown back to being a "B" level show that you really don't need to see in order to follow WWE? Or does most of the angle advancement happen on RAW with more quality wrestling on Smackdown? Or is there no difference between the two shows? I get the impression RAW is still the flagship show and Smackdown is of less overall importance, but I'm not sure. I was going to ask this in the general WWE thread but it got closed, so I ask here... Opinions please? Quote
goodhelmet Posted March 31, 2015 Report Posted March 31, 2015 It feels like a completely unimportant show with random matches and RAW recaps. However, it is much easier to sit through than RAW. The biggest issue is you used to get WWE MOTYCs on SD! and those have been absent for awhile. Quote
Mad Dog Posted March 31, 2015 Report Posted March 31, 2015 I find it easier to watch than Raw but they will burn you out on certain matches quickly. You can run through a week of WWE programming and see the same match two or three times if you watch everything. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.