kingliam Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Hello I was looking for some good examples of wrestlers that would be worth looking at in terms of a diachronic look (over time) and a more synchronic look (same time), with perhaps different territories/regions/promotions instead. What I was looking for is maybe some examples of wrestlers who would not only fit nicely within either way of analysing, but would actively be interesting to look at. I was thinking someone like a Shinjiro Ohtani might be worth a look - Dr Wagner Jr, perhaps? Looking at older lucha, his NJPW stuff and modern brawls. Any other good ideas? Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soup23 Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Chris Hero honestly fits both buckets as he has done a variety of roles for a variety of different promotions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Abdullah would be really interesting, he worked absolutely everywhere from Australia to Japan and Puerto Rico and most of the territories and , later, indies for over 30 years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luchaundead Posted May 3, 2016 Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 Timothy Thatcher and all the other grapple-fuckers in RINGS/UWFI/BattleArts and vice-versa Volk Han in Evolve Matt Tremont or Necro Butcher in FMW And the real fun could Ric Flair get over in modern WWE? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingliam Posted May 3, 2016 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2016 My potential concept would be a person who I could watch every five years, or in four to five different places over a five year window. Something along those lines I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bierschwale Posted May 4, 2016 Report Share Posted May 4, 2016 I'm thinking of guys who could be modified Eddie Gilberts: manage and work, but up and down the card including big main events. Punk is pretty obvious. It has to be someone who seems right as a manager at a fairly young age and doesn't seem bigger/like a better athlete than their charges. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.