Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Watching on mute... I really like the team comes in idea rather than one guy from each team at a time... perhaps a random pick of the six would have been fun almost like EC. Looks good so far but the jump off the top of the cage spot onto everyone is going to be done... which sucks because the full effect just isn't there. This is a good start though and I love that there's two rings.

Posted

Starting to think that one of the reasons we didn't get a War games match is because Vince knew that the camera crew would completely miss things. Not a good night for them

 

And now it has turned into one of those TNA asylum matches with the weapons. And the crowd fucking loves it

Posted

I think I figured out why they've never done this gimmick before: it's because WWE production can't figure out how to shoot a cage match with two rings. The amount of camera switching in this is giving me nausea.

Posted

They're also not utilizing the second ring enough. Most of the action is shoved in one ring while the other is a space for guys to nap.

 

I'm still enjoying the match, it just has some weaknesses.

Posted

They're also not utilizing the second ring enough. Most of the action is shoved in one ring while the other is a space for guys to nap.

 

I'm still enjoying the match, it just has some weaknesses.

 

Again I think all of the action is in one ring because they have no concept of how to shoot this camera wise

Posted

I mean, it's automatically better than any of the late 90s-2000s WCW War Games, and as much as the 80s ones are beloved this one won't end in a lame manager submission.

Posted

I mean, it's automatically better than any of the late 90s-2000s WCW War Games, and as much as the 80s ones are beloved this one won't end in a lame manager submission.

 

Say what you want about the finish but it makes sense with the manager being the weak link and the pure violence that went into the matches.

 

1. 1992

2. 1991

3. 1987 inaugural

 

Still tops in my books

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...