Loss Posted May 9, 2005 Report Posted May 9, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end tomorrow morning at the latest. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks.
Marty Posted May 9, 2005 Report Posted May 9, 2005 Jake Roberts This was a tough call. I've never seen a great Jake Roberts match, yet I've seen a great JBL match. Roberts, though, had a more defined run with the company and had some fun feuds. Jury's still out on what JBL's singles run will mean to the company in the long run. But since Bradshaw's pre-Acolyte career is forgettable, Roberts gets this one.
Loss Posted May 9, 2005 Author Report Posted May 9, 2005 Jake Roberts JBL wishes he could be as great a heel, even if he's had better matches than Jake in the last year.
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 9, 2005 Report Posted May 9, 2005 Jake "The Snake" Roberts There are plenty of reasons to vote for Bradshaw. He has hit the uppercard, had a plus feud with Eddy, contributed in tags as well as singles, and has held the World Title. The problem - or, rather, my main problem with Bradshaw - comes down to one thing. He's not Jake "The Snake" Roberts.
goodhelmet Posted May 9, 2005 Report Posted May 9, 2005 I have listed Jake's accomplishments in aonther thread. They far surpass Bradshaw's Jake the Snake
Guest KingPK Posted May 9, 2005 Report Posted May 9, 2005 Jake. When he was on as a heel, the guy was a downright creepy bastard.
Recommended Posts