Was it the right thing to do by Vince and WWF? No way, it wasn't, it was spineless to do…BUT, in the situation WWF was in, with the fear Vince must have had about what "could" happen, I 100% agree with it. Would I do it in the same position? YES...
WCW had done a LOT to try and bury the WWF and that would have been the final nail. I think about Bischoff during that time and I believe if he had the shot, he would have found a way to get the WWF Title on TV, maybe blurred out and make side comments about what it is, but I think he'd have done it. WWF was fighting for their lives and you gotta get dirty sometimes to do that..
Was it right? NO, Was it the best thing to do with all circumstances? YES… Aside from the title thing, having Shawn beat him puts over your new champ as THE guy in your company now, the guy that beat the champion that left afterward for more money. You can build from there WAY better than having Bret put someone over and then Shawn beat him, while WCW has Bret and makes comments about how WWF's guy couldn't beat their new guy in the end (Bret).
Contracts and legal stuff aside, you gotta do what you gotta do to keep your business afloat and safe...
I am NOT a Vince apologist. He went into a LOT of places, offered their talent more money and then took their TV time. Shady business, but form all the stuff I have read about wrestling, he was just the guy to do it. If not him, others…WCW was trying the same thing to take him down and he did what he had to do to stop it….