Loss Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end Tuesday morning. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks.
Loss Posted May 2, 2005 Author Report Posted May 2, 2005 Taijiri Orton has been a major disappointment at the top of the card, and Taijiri is the better worker.
Marty Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Randy Orton I really hate to pick Orton here, but it's hard to compare his push with Tajiri's. Tajiri's a far superior worker, but is going to be stuck in the midcard and probably will never have a cup of coffee with the main event, while Orton will get opportunity after opportunity, no matter how much he bombs. A really reluctant pick here.
Al Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Randy Orton Probably because Orton has the look, and is extremely popular. Tajiri has not done much beyond the lower mid-card honestly.
goodhelmet Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 I'm going on match quality and charisma here... Tajiri
Guest Mac Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri. He's had far more better quality matches within the timeframe.
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri Even though Tajiri's best work is outside of the WWF, all Randy Orton has going for him is The Push.
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri Seriously, all Orton has going for him at this point in time is the "youngest World Champion ever" tag, which they only gave him to spite Brock. Tajiri is a much better worker, as previously mentioned.
Coffey Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Randy Orton Neither have really done anything in WWE. Tajiri has been bounced around and won some tag gold. Orton has been bounced around and randomly won IC and World Title gold. I think that Tajiri is the better worker but he doesn't really get a chance to prove it in WWE.
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Double Count Out Ok, Tajiri. At least Tajiri has always got the reaction he was meant to get. He's a far better worker, far more entertaining, and a far better human being. Sure, Randy has been on top, but if that was the sole factor in the voting, then it would make the whole tournament pointless.
MyOwnSummer Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri. HTQ sums it up well. Tajiri's a better worker and he's more entertaining.
Guest KingPK Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri. Face Orton just completely bombed, though he isn't that bad in the ring. I just like Tajiri more.
Guest rob Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Randy Orton, because sadly enough, Tajiri is never going to get past the mid-card level. Orton already has, even though his push hasn't been met with much success.
Guest teke184 Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri Tajiri gets the nod on the basis of workrate and overness at the level of the card he was used at. Orton-mania never really took off as much as the WWE tried to force it to.
Guest HungryJack Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri Just because I enjoy watching him far more than I do Orton.
Guest Some Guy Posted May 2, 2005 Report Posted May 2, 2005 Tajiri. Orton's body of work is much smaller. Tajiri has been around since early 2001, Orton debuted in 2003 and promply got injured and was out for months and then got injured again, derailing the start of th Evolution gimmick. He got over as a heel and then died as a face. Tajiri wins for being consistantly entertaining and better in the ring.
Al Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Tajiri was actually around earlier. He was in the Light Heavyweight Tournament, in late 1997.
Recommended Posts