Loss Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end Tuesday morning. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks.
Marty Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Val Venis X-Pac's been in bigger angles, and a greater number of them, but the guy's pissed away so many chances that I wouldn't want him back due to his attitude. If I'm a promotor, I know I can count on Venis more than I could Waltman. I think Venis is a better worker than Waltman too.
Loss Posted May 3, 2005 Author Report Posted May 3, 2005 1-2-3 Kid/X-Pac Was a great worker from 1993-1996, came back and was briefly resurgent in 1998 as well. The angle with Razor in '93 is one of the most remembered things of the time period, he has the great Action Zone tag and title challenge to Bret under his belt and when he came in, no one else in the US was doing those daredevil moves. He was the Jeff Hardy of his day, only a far more complete wrestler.
Guest Mac Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 X-Pac. He was involved in more memorable angles and had some awesome matches in his early years.
goodhelmet Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Cannonball Kid I was going to go with Venis... only because of Waltman's stint on the most recent Surreal Life but his work prevails.
Al Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 X-Pac Really opened the door for lightweight wrestlers in WWE, in my view.
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 X-Pac Despite his attitude problems, he has a far superior and far longer body of work than Val,.
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Sean Waltman Tough vote, but I've got to give it to Waltman. Both basically reached the same point on the card, but Waltman had better matches and more sustained success.
Guest KingPK Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Yeah, I'm going to have to go with X-Pac/1-2-3 Kid myself. He fell off towards the end, but he was part of the Attitude era's most popular stable and had some pretty good matches to boot (I'll throw in his match with Owen at KOTR)
Guest teke184 Posted May 3, 2005 Report Posted May 3, 2005 Sean Waltman His original run as the 1-2-3 Kid, including the angle with Razor Ramon and his later King Of The Ring 1994 appearance against Jeff Jarrett, is more than enough to put him over Venis.
Recommended Posts