Loss Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end tomorrow evening at the latest. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Better matches and longevity Taker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest treble Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 8, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker I'm really interested in seeing just how far 'Taker goes in this tournament and how he matches up against specific people, because while he has never been put in a position to carry the company, he had been a headliner for 14 years, which is a longer consecutive run than just about anyone, and while he isn't a major draw, he is a draw to a degree, and he's been a part of some of the biggest angles and matches of the past 15 years. It's easy to sour on him when he's in our face all the time, but the guy was a star in the latter days of the Hogan era, stayed one through the New Generation, reinvented himself and stayed fresh during the Attitude era and has become a better worker in the past 10 years than he was in the previous five, as even today he busts his ass and you never know when he might surprise you. No one else on this list has the longevity he has as a headliner, and I don't think he'll win, but I'm curious as to how it plays out because we'll see what's more important to the voters -- longevity or huge peaks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 The Undertaker Sid never did shit and I loved "Deadman Inc." Not to mention The Undertaker has had a lot of overlooked gems and memorable moments. Especially as it pertains to Wrestlemania entrances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyOwnSummer Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rob Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teke184 Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Some Guy Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Taker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted May 8, 2005 Report Share Posted May 8, 2005 Undertaker Maybe this time, Sid will pee his pants in this matchup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bruiser Chong Posted May 9, 2005 Report Share Posted May 9, 2005 Taker. Sid advanced further in the business than he had any right to and while I've been a Taker basher for years, he was one of the few stable things in the WWF during the '90s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts