I truly doubt that *Lieb* thinks the WWF cost him a shot at being VP. As in 0.00000000000000001%. Regardless of what "high ranking members of the Democratic party" are blowing up Dave's ass about 2000.
Take a step back. What had more impact on the outcome of the 2000 Election:
1. Nader being on the ballot
2. WWF
It's not close. Remotely close. Same galaxy close.
Florida (25 electoral votes)
2,912,790 Bush
2,912,253 Gore
97,488 Nader
New Hampshite (4 electoral votes)
273,559 Bush
266,348 Gore
22,198 Nader
How many Nader voters would have voted for Bush? They basically fell into two camps:
* vote for Gore
* stay home
Look at those numbers. Even if *most* Nader voters stayed home, Gore needed only a small % to show up to vote for him. 32.5% of Nader voters in NH... 0.6% (!) of Nader voters in FL.
Before anyone points to Pat Buchanan being on the ballot:
Florida
97,488 Nader
17,484 Uncle Pat
New Hampshire
22,198 Nader
2,615 Uncle Pat
He wasn't a factor: he didn't bleed from Bush in remotely the fashion that Nader did from Gore.
Nader was hardly the only reason Gore lost. It's a laundry list. But on that laundry list, the WWF's impact doesn't have a pot to piss in.
Those "high ranking members of the Democratic party" were just blowing smoke, either playing to Dave's pro wrestling-centric vanity or grasping for straws for things to blame the loss on. It didn't pass the laugh test then, nor now. It's the political equiv of "a good diet", which was something Dave would laugh at when a juiced up wrestler explained why his body had changed for the better recently. Dave doesn't have as good of political radar as he has juice-dar.
John