Pick any match vs. Vader. There better than Michaels.
I love the Sing/Vader feud, but better than Michaels best against Foley, Taker, Benoit (wrestlemania) the Summerslam ladder match, i just don't see it. Also my point is, ok sting has had some great matches. But he need's a great wrestler to bring the best out of him, he's not a great wrestler who brings the best out of others. Also how many classic matches has sing had, you got Vader but who else. The Flair match's are average at best, um im drawing a blank here, the tag againt the Steiners?
I am not not crazy high on Sting, though I do think he was a good worker. Still if you are going to include a lot of those Shawn matches it is hard to see any legit argument for eliminating something like Sting v. Flair from the first Clash.
I think the best three or four Sting v. Vader matches compare very favorably to those matches.
Sting had good matches v. Foley, Regal, DDP, Luger, Rick Steiner, Rick Rude, Meng and others. I would generally agree that his list of memorable quality matches is shorter than Shawn's, but there are probably more Shawn matches I've seen where I thought he was outright bad than Sting matches where I thought he was outright bad.
I don't think Sting is easily better than Shawn though. In fact I might very well rate Shawn over Sting. But I don't think he's light years better than Sting