Grimmas

Sorry man. Will get on this this afternoon and fix.

Did WWE sign Dalton Castle? He's not on the roster yet and him versus Taker would be about the greatest match of all-time. At least a match I would love to see more than any other.

It doesn't have to be different for the sake of different. However, I'm really on board that the top few votes are more important than the rest and should be treated differently. There is a lot of arguments about who is number one. I don't see anybody arguing about who should be number 76. The majority of people will be way more effort at the top of their list than the bottom and the voting should reflect that. At least that is my thoughts and Dylan's.

I don't see that relevant, since Smarkschoice had no nomination process and you could vote for anyone. Smarkschoice had no 18 month build up with threads for each person. The process has changed in every aspect from 2006, why stop at the way tabulate votes?

I like everything about that.

I can't find a description of that system online, could you lay it out?

People are going to be a LOT more careful in the top 3 or so. The different between 1 and 5 is bigger than the difference between 96 and 100.

Discuss here.

Discuss here.

We should probably hammer this out before we start getting in ballots. This poll will be weighted with favour to the top 3, maybe even top 10. The question is how? Let's get some options out there and set up a vote. Dylan mentioned Laparde method.

Still a far way from 32 guys.

Guys who could be in this: Kalisto Neville Austin Aries Finn Balor Sami Zayn Tye Dillinger Biff Busick La Sombra Rich Swann Those are the main guys under contract I can see that would fit the tournament. That's a lot of outside guys coming in to fill 32 slots.

Progress is awesome and you get everything!

Final results will be revealed on Friday, so get your vote in now if you haven't. Also on that show, Tim and I will answer any questions you want on any topic. If you have a question or something you want us to talk about, please post it here.

My review of this match. https://prowrestlingsuperblog.wordpress.com/2016/02/15/mini-hator-tequilita-vs-chamaco-gurrola-mini-difunto-monterrey-1312016/

I had Mike Bailey vs Sami Callihan from CZW on Saturday at **** 1/4, so you might want to check that out. Currently my number 4 match of the year behind EVOLVE tag and the two Kamaitachi matches.

Batista vs Brock was talked about as a big match that never happened.

I might need to rewatch the first match, because I thought it was good but nothing special (3 1/2 ish) while I liked Webster's match more. Mid way through main event now, so can't comment.

You liked this more than Robinson vs Webster and Scrull vs Ospreay?

Why do they care? It's not terribly noticeable or anything unless you are looking for it. If it cuts down on one single concussion why would they not switch?

Does anyone know why the WWE cares if someone bumps on their back or their side?

I don't want to derail this thread, but I have no idea what a non-gimmicked pro wrestling match is. But, I'm a guy that at least once has tried to make the case that UWF-i and companies like it are among the most gimmicked forms of wrestling. Sorry, this is a really weird wrestling peeve of mine. I'm probably out on my own island. It's pretty simple. A gimmick match is a wrestling match with a gimmick added. If there is no gimmick added, then it is a non-gimmicked match. What a weird pet peeve. Of course all wrestling is gimmicky, but that has nothing to do with such terms.

All this talk of injuries is a pathetic excuse, as you could still have a freaking great show if they wanted.

It's different because it's a completely different environment. Let's be clear that he didn't punch him in the face or trip him or anything like that. He held him back. If a football player did that to his coach would that be a 90 day suspension? Are you serious? Again, Vince flipping off the fans is not part of the show and not scripted, it was Vince being UNPROFESSIONAL!

How is that an apples to apples comparison? It would be more like an NBA star grabbing his coach just like that and getting suspended. Also does the NBA commissioner have a history like Vince? Really horrible comparison. History like Vince means WHAT? He wrestled Kurt Angle on a plane one time and committed the terrible sin of pushing people in pools? Well as far as I know he never pushed Titus in a pool. Nothing you are trying to reference makes him fair game to be aggressively grabbed for no reason. Especially when it's on camera. Vince waving poopy pants in guys faces? The fact he wrestled and bladed? The fact it is said horse play is encouraged? Also Vince pushed him back just as or more aggressively. Should Vince be suspended too for being unprofessional? Also, way to ignore the fact your comparison was horrible. It's not a horrible comparison imo. I also didn't see you acknowledge how hyperbolic your statement of "something that everybody else does" is when you only have 1 example to go with it. I'm not backstage, so I don't have examples of horseplay backstage. Vince did flip off the referee a few weeks ago, very unprofessional, fire him now. How is Vince anything like the Commissioner of the NBA? Does the commissioner of the NBA hang out in the locker room of NBA players every game? Does he sometimes play in NBA games with them? Does the NBA Commissioner wave underwear in players faces that have feces on them or push them into pools when they are fully dressed? Did the NBA Commissioner cut himself on live TV in order to make the games better? How is this at all the same? How does this deserve a suspension? Is it just because Vince is the boss and he was touched or was it because it wasn't scripted? Was it because he wans't a big star? What makes this suspension worthy and what The Rock did a few weeks ago not or Vince flipping off the referee behind his back not?