-
Posts
13074 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Matt D
-
The Wrestlemania 29 Early Spring NY Weather Disaster Prediction Thread
Matt D replied to Bix's topic in Pro Wrestling
Part of me sees Ziggler vs Miz for the World title. -
Certainly the first War Games was Sting Related. Since it was all about what side he'd be on.
-
In this case, I was mainly thinking about 97 since people were downplaying his influence there given the fact he wasn't working house shows, etc. That might be somewhat counterbalanced by merch sales. In general though, I agree with you. He did show up on a few house shows as a run in at the end but not a ton certainly.
-
Do we know anything about Merch? Anecdotally I knew a lot of people who had Sting shirts or what not in high school.
-
1.) Dusty's pretty hilarious on it since he knows no one is paying attention (save for the two weeks Bischoff is on with him which is then equally funny for his restraint). 2.) You get a bunch of fun random tags. 3.) It's surreal to listen to Solie announce this late in the game, sort of like hearing Monsoon on those int'l shows in 97-98.
-
I really like the 95 C shows, for what it's worth. I have a feeling you probably won' be watching Prime when you hit 95, so it doesn't really matter, but still.
-
That's an interesting concept. I wonder if it's true. ... Anyway, Sting was probably the #3 babyface in the US in that period. The other two happen to be in the HOF, and if one goes further down the list, you'll find a number of "top" babyfaces from that era below Sting that are also in. It is an argument that splits both ways. It's tricky, and that's why I framed it as I did, as an emotional thing. Personally, without looking at numbers, I'd be tempted to suspect Taker (92-98) as higher. Even when he didn't have the belt, he shared that #1 spot with Bret most of the time. Boy did he have some shitty guys to feud with a lot of the time though. And Savage is probably a compelling case. He was basically the biggest draw for Summerslam 91 (or at least Dave thought so at the time), then he had high profile, memorable (and I think decently drawing) feuds with Jake and Flair, basically got Razor over as a top level heel, and he was even used in Early-mid 93 as an anchor on house show cards vs Doink and Lawler. More than that, he was considered invaluable to Vince as a top announcer on Raw, Superstars and Mania 9, not to mention the very public charity work he did in 93 (which is spotlighted all over TV that year) in order to help shake some of the scandals of 92. Macho was the go to guy for that. Late in the year he had the Crush feud which rode things out til Mania X. And we've talked plenty about how he drew vs Flair in WCW in 96 before the NWO came in.
-
I think, in our head, Sting is the guy who is "the second biggest babyface in the US from 90-98." And that's probably not even true, but it's an emotional thing. And it's very hard to argue against that, even with all the numbers in the world.
-
Sting wouldn't have held Vince up for a payoff at Summerslam 1991. Granted, I always find the idea of WCW getting Warrior after that way more interesting than Sting being in WWF in 1992.
-
Honestly, I just wonder what hilarious gimmick WWF would have given him? I think they would have made him a trucker or a lumberjack.
-
Honestly, I think the Christian series was helped, not hurt by all the matches, because Christian is so good at building off of what's come before and switching up his moveset, counters and placement, organically to craft evolving narratives.
-
I think JBL makes Cole way better, for what it's worth. The talk about Rugby last night gave Cole his most entertaining line in forever. "I saw the movie about Mandela." Also, I think I just saw the first Full Nelson Suplex Heenan ever called in a Steiners vs Spicoli/Guy who looks like Spicoli match. He called it the "dreaded nelson toss" and it was awesome.
-
Brodus is just getting the classic WWE humbling depush. So's Otunga for what it's worth. You get highlighted for a while and then you get shoved down the card so you don't end up with a big head like Brock.
-
WCW had so many hours of TV at that point that he had to be announcing something. I wonder if he announced on any of those right after that show. Dusty Rhodes NWO hypeman sounds pretty great.
-
I actually like the second of the three matches better than this. It has more solid limbwork and selling and less outside distraction.
- 12 replies
-
I didn't see much 2007, but I did see 2010 and it amazed me the way they dealt with Cena in Fall 2010. It'd be little things. Like when Wade Barrett would order Cena to FU Orton, they'd go out of their way to NOT do that. He'd get him up and then Barrett would tell him to put Orton down again so he could do it. I found that really striking and endemic of the entire angle. The way he'll give up title shots to guys like Ryder or Ryback. There are a thousand little things that are completely intentional. They can't not be.
-
Really, he's more like Wristlock Holmes. He wants to get to the bottom of the mystery!
-
Like how I'm worth having despite all my drawbacks for what I bring to the table, like an understanding of "for all intents and purposes" which i used to think was "for all intensive purposes" before someone yelled at me on DVDVR a few years ago and I got embarrassed.
-
It was also in the presentation. Pillman wasn't just a football player, he was a walk on, spirit award winner. Ron Simmons was a stand out star at Florida State. It's also about the demographics of both mid-south and WCW. There are few things I care about less than football but it matters a hell of a lot to the great majority of people down there.
-
I think it has something to do with Nova.
-
"He's ambitiously stupid" - Why Scott Keith's new book is scary bad
Matt D replied to Bix's topic in Megathread archive
What interests me there are the references to spots and action, which does sound like early Dave to me. -
"He's ambitiously stupid" - Why Scott Keith's new book is scary bad
Matt D replied to Bix's topic in Megathread archive
Did dave actually come up with those descriptions? -
I was curious if one could make the argument as someone in there for what he did in WCW, though since my question was about finding supplementary evidence, obviously not.
-
These bored the crap out of me as a kid. Yeah, Rude beat him in 89, whatever. Warrior was a mythical being at this point. He was supernatural and they're tossing Rude at him? As a kid who started watching wrestling in 90, I had no reason at all to care about this and a bunch of goofy weightlifting skits weren't about to make me. They went "legit" when they should have gone goofball.
- 12 replies