Jetlag Posted April 10, 2018 Report Share Posted April 10, 2018 Shamelessly stealing this topic from Elliott @ GWE Forums because this forum has more activity and I thought this would be really interesting to discuss: Taking a page from Cap's book, I wanted to put this forward for discussion. Two of the most universally beloved matches ever. Both are WON MOTY winners and I suspect are matches many will consider for #1 overall.What are other people's thoughts on these matches?Where will they rank?Which will rank higher?What are the relative strengths and weaknesses of each? Read more: http://gweproject.freeforums.net/thread/605/comparisons-contrasts-atlantis-villano-austin?page=1#ixzz5CIe6nU3V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 10, 2018 Author Report Share Posted April 10, 2018 Both matches are insanely overrated, however Austin/Hart may be the better match, while Villano/Atlantis is the more epic moment. FWIW Villano III's performance smokes anything the WWF match had. I'm not sure either will make my Top 100 since I'm still hemming and hawing about what my actual criteria will be. Maybe V3/Atlantis because fucking hell that ending.Watching Austin/Hart with Austin's commentary is quite the experience. Austin was right that he could have, should have done a better job drawing in the audience. On the other hand his idea for changing the finish was rubbish. They already crammed too much into what should've been a much simpler match. He could've done a far better job selling the leg. Austin looked worldclass selling the finish. Bret Hart is always such a workman without any frills it's nearly impossible to comment on him.V3/Atlantis may have set the blueprint for every shitty modern apuestas match. They fumble around in the opening with Atlantis probably having the blood rush into his head cause the rudo fans all got on his case. Then there's that fucking spot of the decade contender and they go on and do 2,99999s and near submissions back and forth for 20 minutes. Not going to play that card but how would modern workers not get grilled over doing something like that?? Still, match had that awesome intensity throughout. V3's punch combos and resistance carried the match. He also saved the opening by firing up and ripping Atlantis open when the referee admonished him. I'm not sure the blood and finish was better than Hart/Austin. V3 could probably carry Ultimo Guerrero to a really good apuestas match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NintendoLogic Posted April 10, 2018 Report Share Posted April 10, 2018 This is no contest for me. The WM13 match isn't my favorite match of all time (it's not even my favorite Hart/Austin match), but it is the most influential for me in terms of developing my tastes of what I look for in a match. It's the reason I view brawling combined with submissions as basically the ideal wrestling style. Meanwhile, I actively hated Atlantis/V3 the last time I watched it. The never-ending stretch of your-turn/my-turn nearfalls and near-submissions completely killed the match for me. It was like a PWG Cena match times ten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Rock Posted April 10, 2018 Report Share Posted April 10, 2018 Wrestlemania 13. Atlantis-Villano is great but I feel like it doesn't really get going until the blood starts flowing. Hart-Austin is pretty consistently great and urgent throughout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohtani's jacket Posted April 26, 2018 Report Share Posted April 26, 2018 Villano III vs. Atlantis is a masterpiece. I do think the lead-in to the match is generally overrated but the match itself is a classic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shodate Posted April 26, 2018 Report Share Posted April 26, 2018 Villano III vs. Atlantis iv made my view on hart vs austin well know and hate for it by most Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachchaos Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 yeah we get it you misunderstand the entire purpose of the match WM13 is a classic on every level Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shodate Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 yeah we get it you misunderstand the entire purpose of the match WM13 is a classic on every level as much as love pro wrestling, wrestling has no deeper meaning its not like prog rock album like people paint it that is why i feel comfortable judging wrestling in Bubble there is nothing ot misunderstand there The Luchas match was waht it was marketed as the submission match was not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimmas Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 and hate for it by most why do you keep adding lines like that? You constantly try to make yourself out as a martyr or something for your brave ideas, it's really bizarre. If people hate something you say, so be it, why keep bringing it up? On topic, as great as Austin-Bret is (even if the name of the match does not denote how the match is worked, but who really gives a shit?) V3-Atlantis may be the greatest match in history. The emotion may never be topped. Also, Bret-Austin from Survivor Series is better than WrestleMania anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachchaos Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 My ultimate defense of the "Submission Match" stip is that WWF had never marketed or presented a "Submission Match" in resent history. So if you came in with your own expectations, that's exactly what they were. Hart had the sharpshooter, Austin had the Million Dollar Dream and "submission expert" Ken Shamrock was the special guest ref. Those are the perimeters of the match, but working the match as anything other than a complete brawl would have been a detriment to the entire feud. Austin became a made man and Hart was reborn as the lead heel. It's the single greatest finish in wrestling history. Survivor Series is slightly better maybe from a purist standpoint, but they're way different beasts anyhow. Surivor Series merely sets the stage for the feud. I would certainly argue that no one should watch one without watching the other. If you don't watch wrestling in terms of feuds and how they build, you are absolutely doing it wrong anyway. The entire Austin-Hart saga is some of my favorite filmmaking, period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shodate Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 My ultimate defense of the "Submission Match" stip is that WWF had never marketed or presented a "Submission Match" in resent history. So if you came in with your own expectations, that's exactly what they were. Hart had the sharpshooter, Austin had the Million Dollar Dream and "submission expert" Ken Shamrock was the special guest ref. Those are the perimeters of the match, but working the match as anything other than a complete brawl would have been a detriment to the entire feud. Austin became a made man and Hart was reborn as the lead heel. It's the single greatest finish in wrestling history. Survivor Series is slightly better maybe from a purist standpoint, but they're way different beasts anyhow. Surivor Series merely sets the stage for the feud. I would certainly argue that no one should watch one without watching the other. If you don't watch wrestling in terms of feuds and how they build, you are absolutely doing it wrong anyway. The entire Austin-Hart saga is some of my favorite filmmaking, period. i watch it on a match on a Match by match basis im sorry i cannot overlook the idea of a submsiion match that lacked any real mat work that i expected of a submission match your defense is nota valid view imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachchaos Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 Saying that any match has to constrict itself to some narrow-minded view of a completely worked stipulation because that's how you would like the stipulation to be worked is totally ignoring the characters and context. That's just not how wrestling should be viewed because it's not how it is created or presented, especially in America but it is certainly like this in Japan as well. All those AJPW classics would be almost inconsequential if they weren't part of a larger story. You're doing this all wrong, especially when it comes to a master like Bret Hart, whose entire career was to build nuance on top of his previous masterpiece. The submission stipulation here is so much more important than any mat work could ever be. Bret beat Austin by pinfall by countering Austin's submission finisher and Hart himself was known for the sharpshooter. Austin antagonized Hart for months and the two had a heated feud. They had no interest in seeing who the better mat wrestler was, that time had passed. The submission stip allowed for a situation where there were no disqualifications with a special referee a legit submission specialist. Austin couldn't lose by pinfall this time and there would be no excuses in Hart's mind and Shamrock wouldn't stop it until there was a winner. Austin, totally in character, didn't care and just wanted to beat Hart into submission. They had a helluva fight, which is exactly what needed to happen, and go home with the greatest finish in the history of the business. WWE presents itself as a weekly episodic TV series and viewing it in any other context is just completely irrelevant. You're missing out. You're cherry-picking episodes of prestige TV when you should be binging the entire season. There are a million Volk Han matches I love that almost no one will ever care about because there is nothing there beyond the work. And they're all amazing in the way a lot of world art house cinema is in terms of technique and delivery. But Austin-Hart is Pulp Fiction and it absolutely changed the game on every level. It's like calling Pulp Fiction a bad movie since it's not really a noir crime drama as much as it is a dark comedy. Who cares? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shodate Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 Saying that any match has to constrict itself to some narrow-minded view of a completely worked stipulation because that's how you would like the stipulation to be worked is totally ignoring the characters and context. That's just not how wrestling should be viewed because it's not how it is created or presented, especially in America but it is certainly like this in Japan as well. All those AJPW classics would be almost inconsequential if they weren't part of a larger story. You're doing this all wrong, especially when it comes to a master like Bret Hart, whose entire career was to build nuance on top of his previous masterpiece. The submission stipulation here is so much more important than any mat work could ever be. Bret beat Austin by pinfall by countering Austin's submission finisher and Hart himself was known for the sharpshooter. Austin antagonized Hart for months and the two had a heated feud. They had no interest in seeing who the better mat wrestler was, that time had passed. The submission stip allowed for a situation where there were no disqualifications with a special referee a legit submission specialist. Austin couldn't lose by pinfall this time and there would be no excuses in Hart's mind and Shamrock wouldn't stop it until there was a winner. Austin, totally in character, didn't care and just wanted to beat Hart into submission. They had a helluva fight, which is exactly what needed to happen, and go home with the greatest finish in the history of the business. WWE presents itself as a weekly episodic TV series and viewing it in any other context is just completely irrelevant. You're missing out. You're cherry-picking episodes of prestige TV when you should be binging the entire season. There are a million Volk Han matches I love that almost no one will ever care about because there is nothing there beyond the work. And they're all amazing in the way a lot of world art house cinema is in terms of technique and delivery. But Austin-Hart is Pulp Fiction and it absolutely changed the game on every level. It's like calling Pulp Fiction a bad movie since it's not really a noir crime drama as much as it is a dark comedy. Who cares? all of them all Japan matches were also tv matches so the you can say the us matches tv matches were never good in comparison i also never understood the term good or great tv match when alot the Japanese matches were tv maches but there better in match to match presentation than any wwe my match of say the ae the golden era of wwe i have the measuring stick match that i compare all matches too that is the only pre conceived notion i have of any match dies to compare to my measuring stick match in is own match type nothing more nothng less and for Luchas matches there are two i use fir y sticks to measure to the Ms1 match and the match talked about this topic what you saying is to me to judge this SUBMISSION match i have just shut of my Brain not analyze it for it faults Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peachchaos Posted April 27, 2018 Report Share Posted April 27, 2018 I would say you'd have some ground to stand on if the stipulation didn't directly factor into the finish. But it did, so you don't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Microstatistics Posted May 9, 2018 Report Share Posted May 9, 2018 I'll go with Bret vs. Austin, though it's close. The intricate storytelling and character work connect with me more than the pure emotion of Atlantis-V3. Both should make my Top 50 for GME. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.