Loss Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end Tuesday morning. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 2, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar Both had the equal short-term impact, both were thought to be draws when they really weren't, and Brock was the far superior worker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar Tough call here, but I voted based on Lesnar's working ability, plus the fact that Warrior somewhat contributed to the downswing of the WWF back in the day. Neither guy's title reigns were earth-shattering, although when Lesnar was heel, he was probably far better than when he was a goofy face. Tough one to pick, but I'll go Lesnar, since he had better matches, for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar Tough call here. The Ultimate Warrior competed from 1988-1991, 1992 and 1996. Lesnar wrestled from 2002-04. Both were hot acts for a time, but flaked out and departed unexpectedly. I go with Lesnar because he was a better wrestler, I'd rather see him wrestle again, and he could reasonably go over the Warrior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar This was a no-brainer to me. Lesnar had way more good-great matches. He was able to win over the crowd convincingly after being labelled a Goldberg rip-off early on. He didn't talk to his hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mac Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Lesanr. You can't even compare the two on in ring ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Ultimate Warrior It may not be the right vote, but it's my vote. In terms of drama and historical impact, Warrior's matches with Hogan and Savage eclipse anything that Lesnar brought to the table in his two year stint with the company. Lesnar's the better worker but Warrior was much more entertaining (not necessarily better) behind the microphone and in the ring. And, while Warrior's departure was mysterious and unexpected, Lesnar fled the WWE like a rat from a sinking ship once he realized he might have to actually, you know, give some of those jobs back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 The only problem though is that he was going to be giving jobs back to the Undertaker. That isn't good for business. He didn't refuse to job to Eddy or Angle. It was the Undertaker. I side with Lesnar on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar This was a little tough, but IIRC business was really bad during Warrior's run on top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 The Ultimate Warrior Wrestlemania VII with Warrior against Savage is better than Wrestlemania XIX with Lesnar against Angle. Maybe not the whole cards but those matches. The Warrior just had a presence about him. Yeah, Brock is the better worker but I have a lot of love for Warrior. I was such a mark for him. I didn't know what to do at Wrestlemania VI when he was going against Hogan. Who do I cheer for? I think that Warrior had a bigger impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Both had the equal short-term impact, both were thought to be draws when they really weren't, and Brock was the far superior worker. Brock was actually a pretty good draw for his time, and outdrew everyone else in WWE when it came to regular PPV's during his time on top. I have the numbers and the like from the Observer when Dave compared the numbers and I'll post them here if you like. Brock Lesnar For all of the negative things you can say about Brock, Warrior was so much of a cancer and disruptive influence that he cancels out whatever his positives were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyOwnSummer Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingPK Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Damn. I'm going with Brock Lesnar here. The in-ring ability is the tiebreaker here, as Warrior-Hogan is Dullsville USA to watch nowadays. I changed my vote about 4 times in this post though. I agree with HTQ that, though he was entertaining (in a psychotic way, but entertaining nonetheless), the fact that he skipped town so many times hurts him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rob Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teke184 Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Some Guy Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock, it's close but I'll go with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HungryJack Posted May 2, 2005 Report Share Posted May 2, 2005 Brock Lesnar It's a shame he couldn't hack the schedule, he could have been BIG BIG BIG for the company for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts