Loss Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end Tuesday morning. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob Van Dam Neither of these guys had great careers, and while Matt may be a better worker, RVD was pushed immediately when he was over, albeit briefly. Hardy never was when Mattitude started taking off. RVD also had a cup of coffee with the main event. RVD wins here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 5, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob Van Dam Hardy is by far the more complete wrestler with the better attitude, but RVD has had more impact in the big picture. That could change one day, if Hardy will shut up and stop burning bridges, but I have to give the nod to Van Dam here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob Van Dam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob Van Dam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest treble Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 RVD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob Van Dam RVD hasn't done anything for the last two years, but we still vote him over Matt Hardy. That should really say something about how badly the WWF screwed him up on the tail end of the Alliance angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 RVD- the WWF's wasted opportunity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Matt Hardy because he did more in WWE than RVD did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rob Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Matt Hardy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob Van Dam Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingPK Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Rob....Van....Dam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teke184 Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 RVD Rob walked into the WWF in 2001 and made himself one of the top guys in the company with little to no help from WWF management. He's also been continuously over since then. Matt's had a more consistant workrate and has gotten over very well for his placement at the card, but he was never seen as a top-flight singles guy like RVD has been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bruiser Chong Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 RVD. Both guys were wasted, though. If either one had been given moderate support, they could've been some of the most entertaining wrestlers on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Matt Hardy Because he understands the basics more than Van Dam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Some Guy Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 RVD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyOwnSummer Posted May 6, 2005 Report Share Posted May 6, 2005 RVD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts