Loss Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end tomorrow morning at the latest. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyOwnSummer Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Tito Santana. Honky had an awesome IC run but Tito was far more consistant and a better worker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Some Guy Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Honky. Honky was the much bigger star and drew way more money. Tito does hold the distinction of losing to Savage for his first title win in WWF, though and helping to kick off the Demolition gimmick by dropping the tag titles to them in a squash at WM 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Tito Santana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Tito Santana This may be because I'm actually getting sick of voting for Honky, but while HTM drew a chunkload of money in 87-88, I consider Tito a better worker, even when he was past his prime, and Tito also wins on longevity. Santana had good tag team title success during this era too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 11, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Tito Santana Better worker, and I think HTM has already lasted far too long in this tournament. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Arriba!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 HTM For the time period in question, HTM's peak was far above that of Tito's, and while they both sunk to virtual jobberdom after their peaks, HTM was a far more meaningful jobber to beat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Tito Santana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingPK Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rob Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teke184 Posted May 11, 2005 Report Share Posted May 11, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest treble Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Evil Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Tito Santana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bruiser Chong Posted May 12, 2005 Report Share Posted May 12, 2005 Honky Tonk Man. Once again, the time frame hurts Santana, as I think his best days (match-wise and popularity-wise) were past him by 1985. And c'mon, people wanted Honky DEAD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts