I'm with Dylan here. This isn't Hall & Nash finding ways to amuse themselves while "putting people over" or any other jokes at the expense of the opponents/match. It was done to make the heels look like goofs and make the babyfaces look smart, and the crowd got into it. How is that masturbatory?
Top 10 WWF, which isn't exactly top 10 overall aside from 2 matches.
If we made a better go of the WWF set with bunch of Tito-Valentine matches and whatnot, would it probably get pushed back? Sure, and I bet that the errata set with help do that awesome, awesome feud (rediscovered by many a 24/7 viewer as they seem to show at least one match between them each month) justice. But on this set, with the comedy stalling being unique for the sample (much of the better regarded stuff was anti-WWF like the Memphisy stalling here, the more "southern" brawling in Sheik-Slaughter and Windham-Murdoch, a very Mid-Atlantic tag in North/South-Briscos, the snugness Bret-Dynamite, the unique pacing of Jake-Steamboat from Boston, the fast pace of Islanders-Strike Force) it stood out and carried the match higher for me.
As far as John's post goes...
When I used the word "epic," I meant strictly that it was epic as far as bullshit sections of matches go, not that it's an "epic" match. I'd consider Landel-Freddy, Tracy Smothers vs Jamie Dundee from IWA Mid-South, the Lawler-Mantell (which has an extended referee frisk segment at Mantell's urging where Lawler comes close to getting naked to show that he's not carrying objects) AWA title match that's been nominated, and the Lawler-Idol cage match as having epic bullshit, even if the former 2 matches aren't necessarily "epic matches" in the way that the latter 2 are.
As far as it "not being good work," well, pretty much by definition, it is. Working, at least the original wrestler definition of it (as opposed to the newsletter reading fan version that's taken more of a "overall match quality" meaning) is what the wrestlers do to get the proper crowd reaction. This isn't a case of the Von Erichs getting rock star pops that lasted throughout the match or Hogan-Andre to an extent (the match would've had super heat regardless of what they did though Andre's facial expressions were super and Hogan was Hogan in working the crowd), it's 4 wrestlers building more and more heat through what they did in the ring. You've used the crowd reaction as part of boosting Backlund (who I certainly appreciate, I mean the Hogan match from Philly is an elite performance for starters) in the past (though moreso as part of disputing the claims that he was booed heavily in the latter parts of his title reign, it was still showing how he was effective as part of your argument).
Why can't you just admit this this was effective at the very least and not be disgusted that someone liked it? I may not like ROH nowadays but they're working the right style for their audience's enjoyment, the improvement that I've begged for at times is stuff that they've done in the past that the fans ate up but got abandoned (the booking & wrestling style of the ROH vs CZW feud). Complaints about ROH fans are geared towards attitude and behavior, not their taste in wrestling (Rob Naylor loves ROH. People love Rob Naylor because he's not a blithering idiot). God forbid that somebody be drawn to a flawed favorite and become a Flair Fan. Oh, and if I've ever said anything contradicting this, don't bother looking for it, as my opinions have morphed over time. I'm allowed to do that.