Coming from you, words like that carry volumes.
And its not bad criticism to talk about matches that aren't tied to the set more than the matches that are, because the ebb and flow will be distributed in good time. It always does. Besides, we're given a space to comment solely on the matches and have threads to catch the stuff that got by, which is a good system to have, but when some matches that are being cut for space or whatever legit reason either you two have are big matches, I would hope that you could understand that comments and posts will be made addressing 'omissions'. We're wrestling fans, man. We always bitch. But personally speaking, it's all in good nature. I can easily pick up the scraps that got left off the plate elsewhere, but if I want the best and most organized single year compilation, I know the place to get one. However, I do wish that things were more open. I can't speak for anyone else but myself, but I don't need the shock value of opening up a new thread that Will has made with the listings to the new Yearbook. If that's asking for too much involvement that you cannot perform, I understand, but if striving for 'customer satisfaction' is your only concern, then not doing the thing in a more democratic fashion is not going to attain that goal, hence, outside jibber-jabber of what's been omitted and what's been included over top the omitted stuff. I don't want this comment to spark up a huge anger-filled semantic war, but it is eerily similar to former "complaints" against DVDVR '80s sets. Nevertheless, keep up the good work, gentlemen.