This is not an argument in Warriors favour in the slightest. Everyone votes for who they think is best, we shouldn't avoid a pick because it might be thought of as a weird/bad pick. But this is not a case in favour of Warrior, it does not explain why you or anyone else would vote for him.
If we're comparing these guys who's case mainly revolves around having a bunch of squashes, I don't think Warrior is some 'perfect version' of that. I think Goldberg is on the same level.
I think when laying out this it's unfair to Goldberg to give Warrior credit for having the "most ludicrous" squashes when Goldberg squashes are usually much more entertaining (which should be the metric we use here) and when Warrior never had a squash as ludicrous as Goldberg vs La Parka anyway.
"His look and mannerisms were the most insane." I love an Ultimate Warrior entrance but again I think "most insane" is choosing the criteria specifically to favour Warrior. Why can't we just ask the question which is cooler or which gets you more hyped up: Warrior sprinting down the aisle and shaking the ropes or Goldberg walking through pyro and breathing out the smoke?
I also think Goldberg has just as many great matches as Warrior (and nothing so awful/unwatchable as Warrior vs Goldust or Warrior vs Hogan '98).
Goldberg loses the promo comparison but not talking helped his aura.