Re: Lawler: I've actually been slowly making my way through Will's Lawler set, I knocked off two discs yesterday as a personal tribute to my late grandfather. And I'm sort of stuck in the middle it seems, because I can see where both WP and more or less everyone else is coming from (aside from WP's argument about Lawler's punches).
I'd not classify Lawler as a great *wrestler* and both Lawler and Jim Cornette have said that Memphis, and Tennessee in general, was not big on technical wrestling. But what I've been watching out of Lawler (just finished disc #4) has been phenomenal. His punches are probably the best I've seen (maybe second to Hansen). His bumping and selling is great. And he's excellent in terms of getting the crowd excited, whether he's the babyface (Dundee LLT match) or a heel (the Sweetan match). So I'd classify Lawler as one of the best *workers* of all time, although not for his actual wrestling skills, if that makes sense.
As far as Meltzer worrying about younger fans thinking Batista was great worker. I don't think he needs to worry. The combination of technology being what it is (as far as things like youtube, and all the file sharing programs), and people like Bix, Will, Bob Barnett, etc there isn't any shortage at all of avenues to seek out truly great wrestling.
Re: Brody: I can see where he was a real attraction due to the relative rarity of being able to see him on a regular basis. But I've yet to see any really great matches out of him, aside from the 1981 Tag League final night w/Snuka against the Funks. But one of the golden rules in wrestling it seems is that folks who died are often placed the pedestal, and with a few exceptions (Owen Hart, Curt Hennig) none were as great as they're made out to be.