ohtani's jacket

I think it's actually the RAW from South Africa, later in the year. Nah, it was after the Germany RAW with Sid vs. Mankind and Owen vs. Davey. The South African RAW was spliced with footage from Muncie, Indiana and did a 2.2.

Not sure there's anybody who really believes this. 1993-95 AAA being not very good was an against the grain opinion at one time, but I don't think anybody claimed that CMLL was better.

The mat-based stuff bears at least some semblance to a real fight, and Saint was a short guy who did gymnastics combined with comedy. I didn't say I liked Saint, just that I find him more tolerable than most WoS. If I had to pick, I'd rather be annoyed than bored to tears. You're bored by something unless it annoys you? Does that awake you from your apathy? Snarkiness aside, mat-based stuff is probably less than one third of WoS. They do a lot of head tosses, counters, evasions, escapes, rolls and things of that nature. The limb work differs greatly from NJPW-style or US-60s style. Seems more centred on attacking joints to me, and very seldom do they lay in a hold. I think there is a heightened sense of trickery in WoS. However, I find the suggestion that it is "realistic" laughable. It isn't; as pro wrestling at its best never is. WoS just has a different absurd logic from the absurd logics found in US wrestling, Puro, and lesser forms such as Lucha or modern indie. We were talking about having "some semblance to a real fight" not being realistic. The mat-based stuff that NintendoLogic was referring to has more semblance to a real fight (or sport) than Michinoku Pro. But those pure wrestling contests, and indeed the building blocks of the Lord Mount-Evans Rules (http://www.wrestlingfurnace.com/formalities/holds/holds.htm), isn't really the cornerstone of post 60s WoS. I wish it were, but it's not. Nevertheless, there were plenty of great workers from the late 70s and early 80s that worked a more contemporary style. Sadly, the style ended becoming "Americanised" from that point on (for lack of a better word) and lost its unique character.

The mat-based stuff bears at least some semblance to a real fight, and Saint was a short guy who did gymnastics combined with comedy. I didn't say I liked Saint, just that I find him more tolerable than most WoS. If I had to pick, I'd rather be annoyed than bored to tears. You're bored by something unless it annoys you? Does that awake you from your apathy? Snarkiness aside, mat-based stuff is probably less than one third of WoS.

The mat-based stuff bears at least some semblance to a real fight, and Saint was a short guy who did gymnastics combined with comedy.

Gagne was a pretty good worker through to the early 80s. Of all the Golden Era workers to continue through to the 70s and 80s Gagne lost the least. Of course you could argue that he didn't really do that much in his latter years (certainly, he didn't bump much), but it was really only the mid-80s stuff I saw where it looked like he didn't have the physical strength to pull off the illusion of competitiveness he was trying to uphold. I can live without ever seeing another Gagne/Bockwinkel match, and Baba was awful in their '81 match, but something about Verne was sturdier than Snyder and Rogers' later stuff. Thesz wasn't the figurehead of his own promotion during his "maestro" years, but Gagne probably lasted longer than him too. Granted, he was younger. If you just wanna tip your toes stick to the black and white stuff.

These two paragraphs utterly contradict one another.

Randy Savage is a guy I could go either way on -- either the total package or totally overrated. It depends on what I'm watching. If I sat down and immersed myself in 80s WWF wrestling then I could see myself being enthralled by Savage, but if I'm watching 1950s footage of technicians like Thesz, Gagne or Goelz then Savage just wasn't that kind of worker. Savage was a childhood favourite of mine so I get his appeal. He did an extraordinary job of crafting a wrestling persona. Most workers would give their left nut to create a persona as memorable as the "Macho Man." It may have been heavily controlled, heavily manipulated and heavily scripted, but the end result was that he was able to stand out from the pack and that was no small feat in the Saturday morning cartoon world he inhabited. Hell, he even excelled at soap opera with Randy and Liz being a super-couple to rival Patch and Kayla or any daytime couple you care to name. Crucially, he was a worker who had classic feuds. Some of them were as good in the ring as they were out of them (Santana, Steamboat) and some of them were probably better out of the ring than they were in it (Hogan, Flair, Roberts.) He had his share of excellent matches too even if he was one of the early pioneers of the self-conscious epic. Everyone knows that the Titan working environment prevented him from having the same kind of matches that the guys in the territories did (at least on a nightly basis.) Whether he was capable of night-to-night greatness is highly debatable given his intense pre-match scripting, but really the knock on Savage is the way he slid into self-parody. There reached a point where everything he did was cliched, second rate and a pastiche of what he'd done in his earlier, more creative days. From the promos to the in-ring stories it got lazier and lazier. Savage at his worst would give a promo that was no better than a Slim Jim ad and work a match where his brightest idea was to sell his knee for the millionth time. There was a lot of good and bad that came with Savage but he certainly left his mark. I don't think he belongs in the top 20 but then again he was a guy who created plenty of emotional investment in folks and there's probably a justification in that mix of passion and nostalgia.

I worked my way through all of the 70s stuff I could find. I don't think it would be right to call him a maestro in the 70s just because of his age. He still saw himself as a key player in the business, and it was really only the longer Japanese match against Robinson where he looked like a maestro. (By which I mean a skilled older worker who is a step slower but still has their wrestling wits about them.) I didn't really care for his stuff against Bockwinkel. The matches were predictable and the finishes with Heenan lacked any sort of spark or originality. For my money, Gagne's work against Robinson blew away the Bockwinkel stuff. In general Gagne was still a pretty good worker in the 70s. I liked his studio match against George Gadaski and he gave a thousand times more interesting performance against Nikolai Volkoff at MSG then you could possibly imagine from the totality of Volkoff's WWF work. But there were little things like his jinking and ducking and taunting that lacked the fire of his youth and seemed kind of silly coming from an older guy. Slapping the top of Robinson's head was bad ass, but not taunting the Brain.

The match against Carpentier was excellent. Shoddy finish, but overall it was better than what Thesz was able to achieve with Carpentier. Most people already know about the 10 min Red Bastien match, but it really is another Gagne gem. The similar length Carl Myer match is fun, though Meyer is an older guy being carried as opposed to a youngster. Finished off the 50s b&w footage with a fun tag between Bobby Bruns & Gagne vs. Rudy Kay & Al Williams. Gagne showed all his strengths as a baby face and Williams was entertaining as a heavily tattooed stooge. Took my first dip into 70s Gagne in a match against Bockwinkel but need to get my bearings on whether he was a 70s maestro or a promoter-wrestler hanging on too long. The footage I saw wasn't bad, but it was nowhere near as exciting as the 50s stuff.

I would say Billy Howes vs. Jacques Lageat is the best match I've seen from the 60s, but I shouldn't talk about it too much as I'm not able to share it. Chemoul vs. Cesca would be close to that level if it had a better finish.

There's no doubt in my mind that Arn Anderson during his early 90s peak was an A-list performer. He had smarts, charisma and talent and could cover the full range from hate-filled brawls to comic bumping and stooging often within the same match. His absolute peak was from 1991-1992, and IMO he was the co-MVP for 1992 alongside Ricky Steamboat. The standard knock on Arn is that his singles work isn't impressive enough for him to rank highly on a list like this, but he has an interesting body of singles work that more than complements his brilliance in tags. My argument against Arn would be that his peak was extremely short. Most would argue that he was no less than good throughout his entire run, but I don't believe he was a great worker in the 80s and I think he faded toward the end. What that leaves us with is a stellar run from '91 to '94 or so, and even that peters out in '93-94 due to scratchy booking and less opportunities. Length of peak wouldn't ordinarily bother me, but it was repeatedly held against other workers in this project, particularly Joshi workers and to a lesser extent lucha workers and workers with footage issues. If we're holding everyone to the same standards then 19 is questionable for Arn even if he was a master performer. Talent alone, sure. Overall greatness? Jury's still out for me.

Giant Baba vs. The Destroyer (3/5/69) This is a really good match and Baba is excellent in it, but it's nothing like Baba's other JWA performances and has probably done more than any other match to mythologize Baba as one of the smartest workers ever, a great worker, or better than average. I don't think it's automatically the best match from the 60s as people had a tendency to call it in the past, nor would I really rate it alongside a classic like Thesz vs. Gagne, but it's a strong bout with solid psychology, and it's easy to see why Baba looked like such a world beater when people first saw it. At the very least it's a feather in his cap that most workers would envy.

Yukon Eric? No problem for Verne Gagne. Gagne worked a smart, logical match around Yukon's size and strength advantage that might have been a bit ho-hum if it were any other worker trying it, but Gagne kept up a brisk pace and managed to make the match interesting instead of being bottled down in Yukon's strength holds. Gagne vs. Billy Goelz is a gem. I've been impressed with Gagne as a worker but it's when he shows his wrestling chops that he enters the upper echelon of wrestling greats. This was tough, gritty wrestling. Physical, uncompromising... no quarter given, none taken... And Goelz is just as good as Gagne in the bout. The only disappointments thus far have been the Mighty Atlas matches, but Atlas was an early bodybuilder type who did little more than flex his muscles. Gagne tried to play off Atlas' strength the way he did w/ Yukon, but give Yukon some credit, at least he followed Verne's lead.

So I've started watching Verne Gagne matches and it's clear what a major talent the guy was. And not just working holds either. His bumping and selling were fantastic and he had a flair for the dramatic when it came to pacing a bout and putting it over as a marquee contest. That's not the first thing I'd associate with Gagne, but in all of the 50s footage I've watched he's probably the most dynamic guy on the scene. I saw him have a tough, gritty contest with Canadian wrestler Roy McClarity and a fun game of cat and mouse with Don Leo Jonathan. Then I saw him work wonders with Dick the Bruiser. So far the only thing the Bruiser's shown me he looked like a brute, but against Gagne he was working holds and everything was nasty and great. Even against a guy like the Great Togo Verne bust his ass, and it's damn near impossible to get anything good out of a 1950s Japanese heel. Looking forward to seeing more.

WWE is mainstream regardless of how outdated some of the references are.

There's not as much Rogers out there as I was expecting and a lot of it is against fairly crappy workers like Haystacks Calhoun and Killer Kowalski. The Cyclone Ayana match is worth watching if you're interested in Buddy. I love watching Buddy cinch on a hold. He may not have been a shooter or a hooker, but he knew how to make a hold look good in a pro-wrestling match. Unfortunately the booking is flimsy, so I wouldn't really recommend it unless you want to see more Rogers. I enjoyed the Rogers/O'Connor match more than I did when I watched it for the O'Connor thread. I still think the dip in the second fall stops it from reaching the all-time classic level, but I got a lot more out of Rogers' performance now that I'm more familiar with Buddy. The great thing about watching Rogers is witnessing how much influence he had. You watch him work and you can see a bit of Patterson, Stevens, Flair. A lot of movement, charisma and toughness.

Nice guy, amiable and approachable on social media, dedicated to his craft, but there's no way he should have finished this far ahead of his forefathers. How can Regal be No.21, Marty Jones not make the top 100 and Pete Roberts languish in the 400s? Regal's case is based around his early WCW work, a handful of New Japan bouts and his latter day WWE & NXT work, but there's a big, self-inflicted chunk missing from what should have been prime years. Not only is his output patchy, but his best stuff (whatever you deem it to be -- vs. Larry, the Arn match, the Christian and Hero stuff) isn't in the same stratosphere as the rest of the top 20. Regal was a great artisan whose output was a honest reflection of his life as a wrestler. He wasn't a 5 star, MOTYC type. He wasn't a huge star. He wasn't even that naturally talented. In another time and place, he might have been a plumber or an electrician or maybe a bricklayer. Jobs where you do your apprenticeship and learn a trade. That was the approach he took to wrestling. He learned his craft and worked hard for everything he got. Keenly observant, he developed an in-ring persona, added depth and detail to it, incorporated humour, and entertained people, which is the name of the game. There's no doubt about Regal's merits -- his acting and selling, the detail work, the wrestling skill he acquired. The question is how to you weigh that up against guys who were better wrestlers, bigger stars or in better matches? How do you measure Regal's character work with say, Jim Breaks, other than exposure? Regal seems to be the guy who went the furthest on fan favouritedom/favouriteship. Maybe on another day I'd see that as a victory. Maybe I'm influenced by the fact the last Regal match I saw (against Mutoh) illustrated how quality Regal performances are diamonds in the rough rather than well worn classics. Usually, I'd find that cool, but 21? Higher than Marty Jones and Pete Roberts, that's where I'm hung up. Here's an example of how people can change: in 2006, I don't think there was a wrestler I thought was less cool than Tatsumi Fujinami. A decade later and there are a collection of Fujinami matches that I'd now deem "impossibly cool" -- the Ryuma Go series, the Teranishi fight, the Rocco match, the 2006 Nishimura MUGA bout -- and that's not including his more famous and critically acclaimed stuff. The epitome of an excellent wrestler. Polished all-round skills. One of the original Japanese globetrotters. Could work big or small both literally (heavyweight & lightweight) and figuratively (epic & intimate), and above all, cool. Very cool. Glad to see him get his recognition.

Giant Baba vs. Fritz Von Erich (12/3/66) This is probably the best non-Destroyer bout from Baba's early days. There's a serious lift in intensity from Fritz compared with other Baba opponents such as Kiniski or Bobo Brazil. His singular focus in wearing Baba down and overpowering him the claw is compelling even on a re-watch. Baba's brawling is gangly and exaggerated looking, but the chop vs. claw battle is a simple and effective narrative. It's really only Baba's selling that prevents this from being a sure fire rec. It's not that it's bad as such, it's just a fairly tepid response to Fritz' intensity. That's not the first time Baba has failed to impress due to a lack of fire. Chalk selling up as another weakness in the all-time great debate. The other thing I've noticed is that I'm starting to judge his matches' worth based on the quality of his opponent's performance, which shouldn't happen so often with an allegedly great worker. Then again perhaps Baba's case lies heavily on his 70s work. We shall see.

Casas, at his early 90s peak, was a wrestling genius & one of the greatest performers in wrestling history. And he did it by fucking with people. He fucked with other wrestlers' shit and he fucked with the fans' heads. In lucha there are tecnicos and rudos, but Casas defied category. He was cocky, flamboyant and brash. In a society where machismo rules, he blurred all sorts of cultural lines. He may not have been as provocative as someone like Prince, but as a worker who craved attention, he fed off any sort of outrageous behaviour. The thing that really got under people's skin, though, was the fouling. Casas would laugh at the devil in his prime, but if things weren't going his way he could be petty. He'd foul guys out of spite, out of cowardice, and sometimes for the sake of being outrageous. Yet he was also tough and one of the gutsiest apuesta workers around. He knew how to work the exact same shtick with a serious edge to it whenever the situation called for it and could play the scorned babyface just as convincingly as the provocateur. From the day he set foot in Arena Mexico in '92 he had the audience wrapped around his little finger and the Cathedral has belonged to him ever since. The amazing thing about Casas is that he did it with very little offence. He was a strong defensive worker, a solid mat worker, and able to make kick-punch strikes look effective, but he was similar to Buddy Rogers in that he was able to project an aura of toughness and work a compelling match with only a handful of well-executed holds. As he grew older and wrestling evolved, he moved with the times and added extra holds in a bid to stay relevant, but in his prime it was more the way he gallivanted about the ring that made him captivating. A showman par excellence, he was untouchable at his very best.

Dory Funk Jr. & Terry Funk vs. Giant Baba & Seiji Sakaguchi (5/19/72) This was more up Baba's alley. A pretty solid tag thanks to an energetic heel performance from the Funks, but a 50 minute tag? Even back then Baba was stretching these things out. Maybe it's just me but a tag match should never last 50 minutes. Having four men involved should shorten the odds of a match going broadway, drastically.

Finally got to see the full length Thesz/Gotch vs. Inoki/Sakaguchi tag. It's exhibition-y, but not as exhibition-y as it would have been if I hadn't watched a run of Thesz heading into it. On the flip side, it was noticeable that Thesz was having difficulty hitting his signature spots like the Lou Thesz Press and the back suplex. In general, I thought he as an excellent maestro though, particularly on the mat. I really dug his Memphis squash match against David Oswald.

Why would the WWE claim a copyright infringement on Lou Thesz vs. Ruffy Silverstein? Have they got that big Ruffy Silverstein DVD coming out?

Giant Baba vs. Crusher Lisowski (12/6/67) Pretty bad, but I wouldn't exactly say it was Baba's fault. I don't know what happened to the fun Lisowski from the 50s but he was replaced by a muscled stiff. Baba stood up for himself and made Liowski bleed, but that was about the only worthwhile thing that happened. Giant Baba vs. Abdullah the Butcher (5/19/71) Worth watching if you want to see a lithe looking Abby but a lousy match otherwise. Giant Baba/Kintaro Oki vs. Bobo Brazil/Chris Markoff (4/16/69) Really disappointing given how cool the Inoki/Markoff match was. Giant Baba/Kintaro Oki vs. Bobo Brazil/Earl Maynard (1972) Also uninspiring. One thing Baba hasn't proven to be is a great brawler.

The times were 12:58, 4:28, 7:34. Not a 60:00. You look to be switching between d/m/y and m/d/y format. The three Baba-Bruno matches mentioned are: 2/3/67 = Mar-02-1967 (9:04, 3:00, 3:52) 7/3/67 = Mar-07-1967 (17:30, 13:10, tl) 8/7/68 = Aug-07-1968 (12:58, 4:28, 7:34) Oops, I was being lazy and going with the uploaders' dates.