Grimmas

New Day or Brock will be biggest babyfaces, based in pre show chants.

My prediction is that Bray Wyatt gets the babyface reaction against Brock. No basis for this, just a wild prediction.

It's in Ricoh, not gardens. Gardens has been changed and is too small now.

Logic as it not doing things that don't make sense and take me out of things.

I don't care what people defend. Obviously different promotions have different logic.

Selling, logical progression of moves, moving to get into position for your opponent to hit a move on you, etc.... If I watch a wrestler and don't think to myself that "this doesn't make sense" or "why would he do that" then they are logical. How far does logical go though? Shouldn't most offensive moves actually finish someone? Where each promotion can essentially establish the rules of their own universe it would seem to take away quite a bit to only buy what's logical. Shouldn't every wrestler roll away from an opponent coming off the top? Once there are certain standards or "laws" with consequences then it would seem at that point we can react to occurrences in the ring that prove consistent or not. Sometimes those inconsistencies make for tremendous moments, such as kicking out of something near the finish that has previously been the death knell, or can be problematic where it happens too early. It just seems if we're really being logical then every match should end pretty quickly and just about everything a wrestler does is illogical. Once he's taken any sustained punishment, how is he alive, much less able to mount a fiery comeback? Enjoy it! It doesn't have to be MMA, it just has to make sense within the context of wrestling. An irish whip is completely fine.

Selling, logical progression of moves, moving to get into position for your opponent to hit a move on you, etc.... If I watch a wrestler and don't think to myself that "this doesn't make sense" or "why would he do that" then they are logical.

Shane always wanted his own thing to run. He had the ECW idea, worlwide idea. He wanted to purchase Pride, he wanted to purchase Strikeforce. Original wwf.com was his, he wanted to do streaming stuff earlier.

Live from Toronto for a special event for the first time since 2006. I'll be there live with Musgrave! The card looks pretty fun: HHH vs. Dean Ambrose for the WWE title Brock Lesnar vs. Bray Wyatt New Day vs Sheamus & King Barrett for the tag team title Dash Wilder & Scott Dawson vs. Enzo Amore & Colin Cassady for the NXT tag titles Charlotte vs. Natayla for the divas title Also scheduled for the show are Sheamus, Chris Jericho and Sami Zayn.

A Miz and Jericho team would be awesome.

To me working smart means doing logical things in the ring.

One thing I figured out about myself is that I value smarts over most skills in wrestling. The smarter the worker the higher the praise from me. The more stupid things a worker does, the more down I am on him. What did you learn about yourself during GWE?

I do live too. You know better, but you are into the live experience so you kind of put that out of your mind.

Problem was that Shawn was the heel and he completely baby faced himself in that match, but working a style that would put the crowd in his corner. Contrast that to a year ago when Bret faced Owen, and they were careful to not get Owen over as the face by doing what Shawn did.

PM goodhelmet.

I had this theory and then Dylan stated it later on Talking Sheet Mid-Week show, so I'm feeling more confident. Reigns beats Triple H for the title. Triple H helps Shane win control of Raw, Shane gives Triple H Smackdown. Brand split. Stephanie is pissed, but Triple H defends it as the only way to get rid of Vince and get control of the WWE from him.

Wrestling match hall of fame?

I think it's fair some people are better in their physical peak, while others are better after they have gained a lot of experience.

His linked in page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryan-ward-16b75910

Those are directly inverse career trajectories. So? One is a great peak and the other is a down period for the guy. It just happens to be at different ends of their careers. Why not treat them the same? Sarcasm or you believe this? A question. One guy got great earlier and then when his athletics failed him had a down period. The other took longer to get great, but once they did they stayed great until they retired. What is wrong with treating a slow starter to a slow finisher?

Those are directly inverse career trajectories. So? One is a great peak and the other is a down period for the guy. It just happens to be at different ends of their careers. Why not treat them the same?

Why can't we think of prime Bockwinkel as the 80s and treat 70s Bock like 2000s Flair?

You can't tease something like the authority out of power that everybody wants and not deliver. That's just beyound stupid.

Perhaps the two greatest in ring heels. I'm having so much trouble figuring this one out.

To clarify that spot us just a sign of Harley's problems. Every time I see him, there are issues with him.