Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

WK9 live thoughts


shoe

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Suzuki v. Sakuraba wasn't bad, but was disappointing. Didn't think Suzuki was good in it at all and agree with Tim. They worked it like how WWE would work a "shootstyle" match and while I understand why they did that it hurt the match badly. Missed entire Ishii v. Makabe match due to internet/NJPW World issues. Omega is awful. Tag Title match way overdelivered and was legitimately good. AJ v. Naito wasn't as good as I hoped it might be, but had a great finish and was still solid. Nothing on this show has knocked my socks off. Terrified Okada v. Tanahashi will be an hour. Whatever you think of either guy, there is no way in hell either one has enough shit in their bag of tricks to make a match that length interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, I hate to be a downer here, but I kind of just got fucked out of $40. Due to complications with the Flipps app, I've been able to see about 1 1/2 matches total. I would much rather subject myself to another so-so modern WWE PPV than have to deal with this. I don't care how good your wrestling show is. Sorry, just too stressful.

 

It's a shame too. Sounds like it's been a fun show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went back and watched what I missed. Good show, probably great in many respects, but a few badly timed streaming hiccups hurt my over all enjoyment. That said Ibushi v. Nakamura was a legitimately great match, and I even though I thought it was needlessly long, Okada v. Tanahashi was a good match that I enjoyed as a whole. The big problem I have coming out of the show is that Tanahashi doesn't have a single logical contender. Also worth noting early reports are 36k paid, which would be seen as a good, but perhaps mildly disappointing number before all the sellout talk, but with all of that nonsense being tossed out ahead of time it feels really poor rightly or wrongly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went back and watched what I missed. Good show, probably great in many respects, but a few badly timed streaming hiccups hurt my over all enjoyment. That said Ibushi v. Nakamura was a legitimately great match, and I even though I thought it was needlessly long, Okada v. Tanahashi was a good match that I enjoyed as a whole. The big problem I have coming out of the show is that Tanahashi doesn't have a single logical contender. Also worth noting early reports are 36k paid, which would be seen as a good, but perhaps mildly disappointing number before all the sellout talk, but with all of that nonsense being tossed out ahead of time it feels really poor rightly or wrongly.

 

No idea if they will go in this direction, but I think Suzuki could be built up as Tanahashi's next challenger rather easily. He won a "big" singles match last night and didn't have many losses on his record in the months leading up to the show. Suzuki and Tanahashi haven't wrestled in a very long time either. If Cagematch is correct, they haven't been in the ring together since the 2012 tag league. If they cross path's on tomorrow's Korakuen show in some sort of 6 or 8-man tag wit Suzuki being booked strongly against Tanahashi (or ideally pinning him), a title match in February becomes an easy sell. It also helps that their 2012 title match was very good and can be used to hype a title match.

 

I'd go Tanahashi/Suzuki and Nakamaura/Styles as the two big February matches. They haven't done Nakamura/Styles yet. Styles had a big win last night and with the exception of Tanahashi, has at least won win over everyone he is faced in a singles match in New Japan so it wouldn't be difficult to plug him in as the IC title challenger. I suppose they could also do an Ibushi re-match but only if Ibushi is going to win the title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who'd've thought Ibushi/Nakamura would've been loaded with Ishikawa/Ikeda-esque potato shots? The brutality in that match was such a refreshing change from the usual forearm exchange stuff. I thought Ibushi showed a hundred times more charisma there than he ever has as a junior - the way he condescendingly laid into Nakamura was fantastic. I'm really excited to see him work as a heavyweight now.

 

Thought Okada/Tanahashi was up there with Ibushi/Nakamura and I'm not usually particularly high on either guy. The video package before the match did a great job of establishing the story. My main complaint with these guys has been that they never really bring the hate and intensity you'd expect from a dynastic feud, and much of the matches often feels like rote running through moves. Neither of those complaints applied here. You know going in that even the best Tanahashi matches (that aren't against Minoru Suzuki) aren't going to feature a ton of individually interesting moments or good 'little things' work, but the story will be well-told, the big spots built to well and the match will build to a dramatic climax. I thought he delivered a great performance. I didn't even realise it went so long, and as someone who has little love for the excess-laden style of New Japan main events that may be the highest praise I can give it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really thought the final 4 matches were really good. Again NJPW is really great at building the excitement in a card and having it get better and better. I need to re watch Nak and Ibushi since I dozed off for a few minutes they were selling. I'm really not getting the Omega-Taguchi match love from people. I thought that was a clusterfuck that had some cool moments but not enough to classify it as good. Omega felt like a guy playing pro wrestler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I thought this show was great but still feel somehow lower than most despite me throwing out a lot of snowflakes. Dylan doesn't like Tanahashi vs. OKada as a series but both OhtaniJacket and myself have point to matches in the series we really like. Shoe has been a proponent of New Japan last month of so. I think the problem still lies in the middle matches that some reviews just seemingly have to justify is good. I will use Voice as Wrestling as they are consistently the best source of New Japan coverage. I fail to see where Makabe vs. Ishii was **** or OMega vs. Taguchi being considered good at ***1/4. This is where my disconnect comes with New Japan to an extent, most of the great matches that are MOTYC, I agree with. It is that middle portion where other reviewers (Joe Lanza, Jason Felix, Bryan Rose) have multiple matches at **** or hovering around and I am around the *** mark. That still classifies a good match but I think giving those huge ratings to every show is extreme and generous at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, I thought this show was great but still feel somehow lower than most despite me throwing out a lot of snowflakes. Dylan doesn't like Tanahashi vs. OKada as a series but both OhtaniJacket and myself have point to matches in the series we really like. Shoe has been a proponent of New Japan last month of so. I think the problem still lies in the middle matches that some reviews just seemingly have to justify is good. I will use Voice as Wrestling as they are consistently the best source of New Japan coverage. I fail to see where Makabe vs. Ishii was **** or OMega vs. Taguchi being considered good at ***1/4. This is where my disconnect comes with New Japan to an extent, most of the great matches that are MOTYC, I agree with. It is that middle portion where other reviewers (Joe Lanza, Jason Felix, Bryan Rose) have multiple matches at **** or hovering around and I am around the *** mark. That still classifies a good match but I think giving those huge ratings to every show is extreme and generous at times.

 

I agree with this. There is definitely a shift in the curve and that's not just a wrestling star rating related issue. Unless someone truly believes that there is significantly more good wrestling these days than bad, in theory the majority of matches should fall in the "average" range (** - *** range if using star ratings). I feel the vast majority of matches I watch these days leave me thinking "that was fine" which to me is the definition of an average match. There is nothing wrong with those matches and there shouldn't be anything wrong with stating that a match was average. Average is fine. I like average matches. However, there is definitely a school of thought that sees "average" as "bad" (or at least "not good"). So if someone likes a match, they feel the need to label it as something more than average in order to get across that they liked the match or at least thought it was "fine".

 

The obvious analogy would be to school grades where this shift has been going on for a while. A C-grade should mean that te student is average and there shouldn't be anything wrong with that, but average is often seen as bad in that regard.

 

I am very much into current New Japan. I wake up for all the big shows and watch as much of it as I can. At the same time, I only had a pair of 2014 NJPW matches in the **** 1/2 surefire MOTYC range last year (G1 finals and Suzuki/Styles). I did however view a ton of NJPW matches as being in the average to good range (** 1/2 to *** 1/4 or so if we are talking stars). A promotion that has a lot more average-ish or above stuff is still a really great promotion and one I can get invested in. Like Chad, I liked last night's show. I thought the final two matches were upper tier level matches, the tag title match was good, and basically everything was average or better. I just don't necessarily think it was a show with two blow-away (***** range) matches and four others at or around ****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally finished the show after falling asleep during Omega/Taguchi. Omega's offense was good, and while it wasn't a blow away match, it was as interested in a Taguchi match as I have been in a while. The tag match was shockingly good, and by far the best match Guns and Gallows had. Styles and Naito had a really solid match, but we're blown away by the last two matches. Nakamura and Ibushi were shockingly violent and went to a different level. Then the main event.....definitely did not feel too long to me. Shocked that Tanahashi won, but that match built to a really hot finish that I thought was great.

 

I still do not get the air guitar though.

 

Really curious what Okada does going forward. Might be that not having a belt around his waist while his CHAOS teammate does starts to bother him a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...