sek69 Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 TNA is considering adding a Women's title (NWA World Women's title perhaps?) and a tag team X divison title sometime in the next year. The X tag title would add some depth to the division and give some of the guys not in the singles X title hunt something to do, and I have to admit I'm interested to see what a non WWE company can do with women's wrestling. I don't see why it can't find a niche without having to be reduced to bra and panty jello pudding fights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest savagerulz Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 The X tag title would add some depth to the division and give some of the guys not in the singles X title hunt something to do Just think of the overabundance of belts it would create. Plus, it's not as if these same guys couldn't go after regular tag titles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted December 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Overabundance? One of TNA's problems is they only have 2 (3 if you count the World title, which is pretty much JJ's) titles and a shitload of people milling about with not much going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest savagerulz Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Here's what you do though...you make the rest of those titles mean more by having EVERYONE who can gun for them. The more people gunning for a belt, the stronger the BELT is. They got it with the world title. They sort of have it with the X-title (prior to Joe's arrival, seems like everyone wanted it). You only dilute the importance of other belts by adding more. Strengthen what you have and it will reap more benefits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheShawshankRudotion Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 They have 1 hour of TV time per week, *everything* they would do on TV would be concentrated on each title, no contender spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest savagerulz Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Okay...and adding more belts is the solution that is offered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheShawshankRudotion Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I wasn't responding to youze. I agree wit youze. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted December 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I'd wager the fact that this is being considered would mean that TNA must think they're going to get additional TV time in 2006. The ratings for Impact have been steady, the one dip was recovered the next week. They've done the best you could hope for with the incredibly shitty timeslot they currently have. I think once WWE starts getting pre-empted by dog shows again, you're going to start seeing 2 hour TNA shows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 The last thing I want to see is TNA bring in a bunch more women just so they can have a "credible" division for the women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted December 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I know most people have been trained by the WWE "divas" to think that most women wrestlers are talentless bimbos with ginormous fake knockers, but there's a lot of talented women workers in various NWA territories that TNA could bring in that would mean a women's division with actual wrestling talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest savagerulz Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 And they already have Gail Kim. I think once WWE starts getting pre-empted by dog shows again, you're going to start seeing 2 hour TNA shows. By the way, I don't think USA has the Dog Show anymore. But if they still have tennis or something, then they might get bumped for that. Or if the ratings decline any more, "Monk" reruns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I know there's a lot of talented female wrestlers, that doesn't mean I want to see them in TNA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted December 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 And they already have Gail Kim. I think once WWE starts getting pre-empted by dog shows again, you're going to start seeing 2 hour TNA shows. By the way, I don't think USA has the Dog Show anymore. But if they still have tennis or something, then they might get bumped for that. Or if the ratings decline any more, "Monk" reruns. Raw's getting bumped in Feb, I believe, for the dog show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheShawshankRudotion Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 In terms of making the most out of the time given, TNA has done a pretty shitty job, if you ask me. They try to cram way too much stuff in, and even the thought of more titles suggests that they still don't know how to use their TV effectively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I'm thinking this means that they expect to get a second hour of tv next year. I liked the idea of the X Division Tag Titles. That way they can leave the belt on Samoa Joe for a long time and still give the second tier guys something to fight for. I think they need a Television or United States belt over a Women's belt. It's been shown time and time again that some of the heavyweights like Chris Harris have needed a secondary title at points. Plus with a Television Title you could bring back the 10 minute time limit match for it on tv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 They could probably get a huge number of Joshi stars that have virtually no wrestling market to speak of right now, that while past their peak, would still seem fresh and standout here. They should make an effort to do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I was surprised to see that Lelani Kai is still an active wrestler. She's gotta be at least pushing 50 at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 Lelani Kai is awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Posted December 23, 2005 Report Share Posted December 23, 2005 I was always annoyed that that stupid WOW promotion had all of these rejects they were training as they went but never brought in any veteran talent like her. Actually now that I think about it Kai worked some dark matches for TNA in the early days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted December 24, 2005 Report Share Posted December 24, 2005 This is a fine idea if they already have more TV time secured. If not, then it just makes a crowded show more crowded. I can't believe I just agreed with Rudo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted December 24, 2005 Author Report Share Posted December 24, 2005 Again, I have to say I don't think they'd be kicking the idea of more titles around if they weren't at least getting the impression from Spike of increased TV time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Noah Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 I don't think this would be the greatest idea.. I agree making each of the 3 Championships mean more, makes the product overall better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 I've always hated the idea that mid-carders "need" titles to have something to do. No, what they need is GOOD WRITERS/BOOKERS to give them something to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CanadianChick Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 I was always annoyed that that stupid WOW promotion had all of these rejects they were training as they went but never brought in any veteran talent like her. Actually now that I think about it Kai worked some dark matches for TNA in the early days. Yep. She worked against Canada's own Madison in a dark match and actually won the NWA Women's title from her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 I've always hated the idea that mid-carders "need" titles to have something to do. No, what they need is GOOD WRITERS/BOOKERS to give them something to do. Agreed. And if you book with the idea of making everyone a star, no one is. So much parity booking in WWE the last few years that people have come to expect wrestling to be that way, where there aren't any ruffled feathers on or off screen and people just coast along trading wins back and forth on every PPV before moving on to something else. If you look back on companies with multiple singles titles, there has always been a reason for them. The Intercontinental title was a belt that got pushed when WWE started running two sets of house shows and needed another strong belt to headline the B shows. In the early 90s, it morphed more into a belt for guys climbing the ladder and when Russo started booking, it became a prop and lost all meaning. It really doesn't serve any type of purpose at all and is not reflective of the company pushing a wrestler, despite the arguments of someone who will typically point to an IC title reign as proof of the company getting behind a wrestler, when it usually means dick all. And in WCW, the TV title was originally created just because Crockett would be getting a cable deal soon and wanted a belt that could be defended on television to draw ratings, without giving away too many big matches and killing any reason to come to house shows. The US title had roots in the territory as the top title (merged with the National title in August of '85) and still meant something in the Mid Atlantic area and was capable of drawing. Not that it would have happened by '85 or so, but if the Board of Directors pulled a power play to get the belt off of Flair, they still had their top title held by one of their top stars, and it had lineage for local fans and could draw. When Lex Luger won the World title while holding the US title in 1991, the belt lost all meaning and was a prop for the next 10 years, just as it has been in WWE since getting revived. Secondary titles in a national wrestling company where there's only one touring group are really meaningless. It's just a wrestling standard that was based on a territory business model where house shows are the main source of revenue that was applied to a national business model based on television ratings and pay-per-views, to little or no success. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts