Loss Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end Tuesday morning. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Fun, memorable run as Intercontinental champ in 1987 and 1988. Jannetty had a fun career, but not nearly as successful, and never truly reached his potential for various reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Janetty was a really good worker, but this is really no contest for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 3, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Marty Jannetty Had a great run with Shawn Michaels in the Rockers and had some very good matches as a singles wrestler as well. HTM was the bigger draw, no question, but since this is a fantasy tournament, I say let the most talented wrestlers shine for once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mac Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Jannetty. Better ring worker in this period. That's what it is about, not long title reigns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Besides the Ring Crew Express, I don't think Jannetty's legacy will hold up. I think, even though his ring work isn't that sharp, Honky Tonk Man had more impact, drew more money, better interview, blah blah blah. As the results of the Piper-Jericho matchup showed, this is't about who was the better worker, it is about he impact of a particular wrestler... I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 3, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 If you still want to vote on work, feel free. Everyone is going to have their own criteria, apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 The only problem with voting on work is that I have not seen enough Honky Tonk Man matches... at house shows, Coliseum videos, that I remember from TV as a kid, to really vote on HTM's work. I am just taking for granted the standard that HTM was a crappy worker. I may have to hunt down some stuff to make that determination myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 HTM. He was simply the best heel in the company during his IC run. People really wanted to see him get killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man His gimmick is good enough that it still draws on house shows. Jannetty was a fine worker, but outside of a few matches with Shawn in '93, he never had any real success as a solo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man HTM's WWF legacy will live on long after people have forgotten who Marty was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Marty Jannetty Much better in-ring worker, who contributed in singles as well as tags, albeit in truncated stints with the company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingPK Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Jannetty I also want the better worker to get the nod here. His match with Angle a few months ago, though not as good as I first thought upon recent viewings, showed that he's still got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bruiser Chong Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 HTM. Jannetty was easily a better athlete and wrestler, but aside from his time with the Rockers, his WWF years were a disaster. He never got things together and when you think of Jannetty, "wasted potential" is a phrase most likely to come to mind. Honky was essentially of no use post-IC title days, but my god, WWE wishes they could get a heel that much legit heat without stooping to cheap levels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rob Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teke184 Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man. Jannetty was good whenever he had Shawn Michaels pulling him around, but so did a drugged-up Scott Hall. HTM got tremendously over as a heel and ran with it. While he may have not been a better worker, he was certainly more consistant in that he wasn't ever obviously messed up on something in a match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Marty Jannetty Marty, without hesitation. I absolutely love The Rockers. They'd be my pick for best WWF/E tag team ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Some Guy Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyOwnSummer Posted May 3, 2005 Report Share Posted May 3, 2005 Honky Tonk Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest treble Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Honky Tonk Man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts