Loss Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Vote for the wrestler that you think had the better career in WWE (whether you base that on impact or match quality is your decision), from 1985 to 2005. Voting will end Tuesday morning. Please give the wrestler's name first and any explanation thereafter. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 4, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker The Undertaker has the best gimmick in company history and has taken it and run with it far longer than everyone ever would have anticipated. He's also had more good matches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Man in Blak Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker Hilarious matchup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sek69 Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Taker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodhelmet Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Chavo enters the ring. He rushes at Taker with reckless abandon. Taker grabs him by the throat. Lifts him up, Chokeslam! Winner... in 23 seconds... Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hunter's Torn Quad Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Chavo What ? It's not like he'll win, so why not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker Apples and oranges. Undertaker's been a long-time main eventer. Chavo's been a midcarder around for a relatively shorter time. Chavo's a better worker obviously, but that's also cancelled out by Undertaker's merchandising success and his part in the biggest drawing segment in RAW history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 The Undertaker Some of these are laughably one sided. If we're going to use a Guerrero, why not Hector? That way, we can wax poetic about the contributions of the Goobledygooker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted May 4, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Hector wasn't part of the Smackdown Six. Hector never held a title at all. Hector didn't have the #2 MOTY in 2004 for the company. I didn't vote Chavo over Taker, and wouldn't, but the guy is very underrated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 The Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alfdogg Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest treble Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KingPK Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker Yeah, Chavo was part of the Smackdown Six, but if I had to rank them, Chavo would be #6 no doubt. Taker took his gimmick and totally immersed himself in it, really getting it over in the early days and keeping it over for 13 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest teke184 Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker. Chavo is a MUCH better worker but Taker has had almost 15 years on top in a company that has had a tremendous amount of turnover every few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyOwnSummer Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Undertaker. Poor Chavo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mac Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Taker. Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Some Guy Posted May 4, 2005 Report Share Posted May 4, 2005 Taker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rob Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Undertaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted May 5, 2005 Report Share Posted May 5, 2005 Undertaker I voted for him but I take issue with this statement: "The Undertaker has the best gimmick in company history " Better/more successful than Hulkamania? The People's Champion? The Toughest SOB in the WWF? Those were all gimmicks and far more successful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts