Reminds me of Jim Cornette's point in the 1997 Timeline interview. (Cornette was pointing out that San Antonio was not much of a tourist attraction, therefore it was a mistake to do a stadium show there (Royal Rumble 1997). Aside from, I think, ringside, every ticket in the arena was cheaper than dirt, and they still couldn't sell the place out.)
Couldn't have picked a worst example since San Antonio revolves around tourist attractions... the Alamo, the Riverwalk, Texas stereotypes, the Missions, etc.
At one point, San Antonio, Boston, San Francisco and New Orleans were the four cities with the biggest stream of revenue coming from tourism.
That doesn't mean I disagree with Cornette's point that SA was a bad choice for doing a Dome show in 1997. It is a poor city with poor people and early 1997, wrestling wasn't really hot yet.