Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Matt D

DVDVR 80s Project
  • Posts

    13069
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matt D

  1. Twenty minutes of nothing?
  2. Where do people stand on Triple H/Owens vs Zayn/Ambrose?
  3. Babyface Muraco's pretty out there too. Orndorff in his last babyface run against Rude, too.
  4. Patera in 87-88 stands out huge to me.
  5. Place to look is probably his IC title run, August 2011 - May, 2012, including the Show series (he lost it and gained it back), the Christian match at the end, an Orton match, a Morrison match, the Dibiase match. It's still 10-15 minute matches but that, with the Mysterio match, is probably the best you're going to get there. I'm sure someone could dig through the Smackdown matches for that era and find some more. I think there's enough to know. EDIT: Yeah,that there post after mine.
  6. He always did have a soft spot for hillbillies.
  7. AJ "needs" the entry humbling. Especially since he bypassed NXT and Vince never made him. The Jericho loss doesn't count.
  8. We have a lot of data points on Cody.
  9. Nope, this isn't 78. Can't find the result anywhere, so I'm not sure (but it makes for a mystery card, which could be fun, right?) The match itself wasn't so great for the first ten minutes. Nerve holds. Even Lothario can't do do a lot with nerve holds. Boesch is great at filling the time in these situations. There are two sorts of announcers, the ones who make the match more emotional resonant and the ones who make the matches more entertaining. Boesch is in the latter camp but I've come to really like him. Everything from the ten minute mark was pretty good though. Some dueling claws, some armwork to counter the claw, Krupp looking pretty effective as a heel, a nice comeback. The Supersock as a counter to a top rope move is a weird parallel to Sweet Chin Music in that same scenario.
  10. There's a bunch of Krupp up and down the Houston cards, so it'll be good to see how he worked in that gimmick against someone as good as Lothario. I will say that if that's the March 24, 1978 card, and you have that one, well, that's an interesting card.
  11. I thought this was the second strongest Lewin singles match we've seen so far. He does well as a babyface against a stooging heel. Gino bumping around and eating his mysterious strikes from the orient and clubbering blows kept things moving. The blood took care of a lot of the heavy lifting when it came to Lewin selling. Some of his actual bumping was pretty rough (especially that one into the corner shoulder first) but they kept it sufficiently violent with the chairs. There are things I really like about Gino. He's more than willing to just cut someone off with a knee or strike when he's brawling but then he'll make sure to rake his opponent's eye not once before taking over. This was probably the best use of Hart we've seen up until now on Classics. I liked the mixed tag quite a bit too, for what it was. Sherri was very sympathetic. I wish we had seen Martin in control a bit more since she has great offense but she played her role well for what she was supposed to be doing. Entertaining stuff and Boesch is really fun on commentary in any sort of out of the norm situation like this.
  12. The issue is with Edge's center of gravity. He literally can't get the opponent to land like that.
  13. This thing is pretty damn stupid:
  14. Panther/Puma could be the rivalry of the next decade.
  15. The STF doesn't bother me because it's been built and has symbolic meaning. If the company treats it as a big deal and it's sold as a big deal, it's a big deal. I wonder if that means I'd be okay with the Rainmaker? I have no idea.
  16. This might be easier for you: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLChv0pBLKwSz8ySu_UdvxPb6syzLG44_J
  17. I can't listen to Exile, BtS, AND 6:05. I don't have the time for all of them. so I don't listen to 6:05. That said, I'm glad it exists so that others who can find the time to listen to it do listen (and if i do someday have the time to go back). That's like getting mad that there's too much wrestling on TV and not enough time to watch it all. I'd rather have too much to consume than too little.
  18. I'm keeping up with this feud and little else on Raw right now. I liked the first few bits of move stealing, but thought it got to be a bit much by the end. It went from being clever and novel and trollish to being too cutesy.
  19. Matt, I'm kind of surprised you liked this match considering you are not a Volador fan. I give Volador fair shakes. I think he's very good at certain things (hitting spots, complex sequences, being a dick to mascots). He's a very useful role player in tags and trios. Where he's most problematic is when he's in a singles match because he has a tendency to bring the worst out of his opponents, will be prone to hit spots for the sake of spots, make things overly complex, contrived, and obviously collaborative, and have far too drawn out finishing sequences where something less bloated would be more appropriate and make for a better, tighter, more impactful match. He does cool stuff but way too much of it to the point where none of it matters in the least. That's less of an issue in a tag because cut offs and trading of partners can dilute that in the very best way (though it's still a danger). Here, the pacing works very well, the escalation is meaningful and pays off, and as a whole, the thing doesn't overstay its welcome. I'm as hard as I am on him because he does a lot of things well and because I generally want to like his stuff, and often do for the first two to three fifths of his matches and then get increasingly frustrated after that. If I thought he was Thunder-quality or something, I wouldn't care nearly as much. A match that could and should be great getting ruined is far more heretical and offensive than a match that never had a shot at being good.
  20. It can make sense, if they make it make sense. It doesn't make sense in every situation without them doing the legwork (you know, "putting the work into it" not "working over the leg." Homograph. One of those wrestling terminology issues.). It could make sense, but then so could masked confusion or twin magic or poison mist or preternaturally hard heads. It doesn't inherently make sense on its own and shouldn't be naturally forgiven unless they actively make it work within the match.
  21. Again, it goes back to transitions. Wrestling is a collaborative art form. Sport is a competition. Narratives are narratives sure, but it's a different world. The parallel isn't sport. It's a movie about sport or a well balanced fight scene in a genre novel (though that involves one person instead of two. Maybe a comic where you have both a writer and an artist working in tandem). There's a different level of control and cooperation and the ability to craft a story that's proactive and not just reactive. I watched Butch Reed vs Dick Murdoch last night. The first 15 minutes or so are based on armwork. Murdoch sells well, even when he tries to regain some sense of offense. Reed is mostly focused. At the end of the 15 minutes, the time limit ends, and they agree to go on in the match. This leads to a break in the momentum, stalling, and Reed getting frustrated, shifting his gameplan, and going with haymakers instead. That allows Murdoch, who was knocked out of the ring, to recover his arm enough and engage in some rope running as, by this point, Reed just wants to get him. Out of that, he gets a quick cut off and starts on the leg. Now, later on, Reed goes back to the arm as a way of fighting back, which is one thing that brings the match to a next level, but if he never went back to the arm, it'd still be perfectly acceptable because of the way they transitioned out of it and gave Murdoch time to recover. There were enough dots to transition out of it while still respect what happened earlier in the match. Reed's shift in behavior (which is a word I'd use even more than gameplan or strategy) was believable to me and fit his character and the match and wasn't dissonant to the rest of the actions and consequences of those actions that surrounded it.
  22. According to Kris' lucha report it's Liosas Nuevo Laredo.
  23. People should check out Mascara Dorada/Volador vs Flamita/Caristico. It's up on youtube. Very fun match with great action, great spots, some surprising and enjoyable rudo work from Dorada (and Volador, who's a natural jerk) in the middle, and it never wears out its welcome or escalates to the point of ridiculousness. Plus it's cool to see Flamita interact with these guys.
  24. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a password protected forum. Enter Password
  25. If you can connect the dots and contrive that story from what you're watching, sure, but the dots have to be there. You can't just accept the dropping of one thing or another unless the match justifies it. It's not a get out of jail free card just because it exists in sport.
×
×
  • Create New...