Matt D

He's more like the Buzzkill of podcasts.

Oh I want to hear more about the potential unification match in 1991 with WCW. That is one of the most interesting stories I can imagine.

I'd be curious about the difficulties of wrestling in front of the same crowd every week. It means you can't take shortcuts that you might have been able to on, let's say the WWF roster in the 80s, where you'd work the same match 40 nights in a row.

I know this is the worst question in the world to ask, but does he get why we like him so much?

The ref was supposed to be crooked in that match with Kerry, right?

I thought this was going to be about dating a plug for his softball team on Memphis TV.

To me it's kind of hilarious that this was the show they used to try to sell the Network.

I think that .. I'm not even sure where to begin here. Maybe read the Bret Hart vs Ric Flair note? Which I wouldn't wish on most people, but that might help explain both how people feel about sacred cows here and the fact that we've got plenty of people who didn't watch, in real time, a lot of the wrestling that they now love, and also that go against a lot of the long-standing dogmatic views of WON-centric or (i hate to raise him so high but) Scott Keith-centric mentalities. Don't get me wrong. i get why you said that. It's just not true at all here.

I think people sleep on that Foley match. Some of it was spectacle for the sake of spectacle but I think Foley is very good at making that sort of stuff mean something and he directs Ric through the hoops to create one of those WWE storytelling matches that does stand out.

Every now and again, it'll have an article by someone who we know and that I want to read. In general, I don't think its targeted well to a lot of the people here though. I'm glad the thing exists for the audience that would be interested in it and I'm sure it would have interested me a lot in 1999 or whenever I was deep into my teenager smarkiness, but I think there's a wide gap in viewpoints to the point that I'm not sure this is the best board to even hype up the thing on.

WWF @ Sassari, Italy - April 11, 1989 WWF @ Cagliari, Italy - April 12, 1989 WWF @ Palermo, Italy - April 13, 1989 WWF @ ?, Italy - April 1989 WWF IC Champion Rick Rude pinned Bret Hart I know sometimes fancams from the European tours popped up. I kind of wish we had that one.

Not at all. We go off on tangents like this that start off as Dave-related. It's 4400 posts long. I started all this and I really didn't even have a horse in this race. I just thought it was weird that you'd start professional coverage of a sporting event with a Thumbs Up/Down poll from your readers.

Look, if we can't repeatedly answer "Yes" to the "Is TNA the worst promotion ever?" note, you can't get away with that here.

The script was pretty much a non-entity. Did we really learn anything there?

Quite the opposite.

You guys are like the Vader of message boards.

Kris Z, the Calvary.

I just don't think I'd lead with it in my publication's evaluation/recap of the show.

We live in a nostalgia-driven culture. Maybe that doesn't work in the south? How did the Dukes of Hazzard movie do? EDIT: Eh, it made more than its budget, and hey, that was ten years ago.

They won't shell out 60 dollars to see a Sting match. They'll perk their ears up at the idea that Sting is having a match in WWE finally and take a look at what else is there. The match itself is just an attraction to get people to the door. Everything else will pull them in. A Sting match would just be a doorbuster.

That kind of gives credence to Bryan vs Sheamus in the Wrestlemania Midcard. Otherwise they would have either been glad that he was building Bryan and the feeling they tapped into up or they would have just clued him in.

I think that's because the Network puts us in a whole new world. The amazing thing is sometimes they actually look like they realize how they can leverage it too.

Warrior couldn't walk. They wanted to use Hogan somehow, but apparently the idea of someone even running into his fist was hard to get approved (they eventually did). Warrior doesn't look like Warrior. Sting sort of looks like Sting (though he looks more like an old heavy in a gangster movie), and the make-up covers up some of it. I think the end product wouldn't be ultimately satisfying but that you could raise interest in it because for a lot of the people they're trying to draw (and have to draw with the network, out of sight is out of mind and... I know how we can solve this. Kris needs to tell us what all of his casual wrestling fan buddies think.

Am I the only one who finds the Thumbs Up/Down/Middle for UFC events sort of weird? I get it for wrestling because almost every TV show has individual episodes rated by users on IMDB. That's pretty understandable, and it does lead off from the reader contribution history of the WON. MMA is a sporting event though. I couldn't see a sporting publication leading their coverage of NBA on whether or not people thought it was a good game or just an okay one.

Cody on JBL/Cole is probably the single most entertaining thing WWE does right now.