Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've considered it. I once produced 4-5 videos of selected biography segments from early Titans of Wrestling shows, and those were time consuming. Also considered a youtube podcast, which evolved into Titans Xtra. Basically I don't think it's really worth the extra effort as far as attracting new listeners is concerned, but who knows, I may try again sometime in the future

Posted

I can't imagine wanting to WATCH a podcast. Maybe that's just me. I do a lot of my listening via my phone or on the go anyhow. Podcasts get me through trips, tasks, etc.

 

Enough free time to sit down and watch stuff is usually reserved for Netflix or actual TV shows.

 

I just don't think it'd do anything to attract new listeners. To me - in my view - the audio is more readily & easily accessible anyway.

Posted

I can't imagine wanting to WATCH a podcast. Maybe that's just me. I do a lot of my listening via my phone or on the go anyhow. Podcasts get me through trips, tasks, etc.

 

Enough free time to sit down and watch stuff is usually reserved for Netflix or actual TV shows.

 

I just don't think it'd do anything to attract new listeners. To me - in my view - the audio is more readily & easily accessible anyway.

Pretty much this, don't see the point.

Posted

Yeah, I don't know how many viewers a video podcast would get. I could see a 5-10 minute YouTube show, but anything more than that would be kind of overwhelming. Podcasts work, because audio is something you can enjoy while doing anything else, video requires much more attention to fully appreciate. As someone who has done some video editing, I don't see why anyone would want to spend that much time doing something for free. In order to film, edit, and produce a piece of polished video is a huge time sink. The amount of depth the PTBN hosts put into their podcasts would be whittled down to damn near nothing, while doing 10-15x the work. I took a video media class in college where we had to produce three video projects, none of which could be over two minutes. We had to find a subject, film it, interview a couple people and then edit the videos and each video was probably 12 hours or more of work. The thing I realized while doing all that work is that the finished product was only representative of about 10% of the work. You spend a lot of time setting up cameras, shooting footage that has no value(B-roll is like oxygen, you can't breathe all the oxygen in the air, but you can't breathe without it), writing(it saves a lot of time to have a script, because those awkward pauses, umms and uhs are much more noticable when watching someone instead of just hearing them.), and cutting out all of the nonsense(video has to be concise, nothing is less entertaining than meandering, unfocused, video features). A video podcast with any production value at all would take much more time than what the finished product was worth. I like wrestling podcasts, because I can hear different perspectives in a natural, off the cuff conversation. Video doesn't really work like that, those conversations don't get that kind of time, have to be more focused, and take an entire different skillset than it does for audio.

Posted

And in a similar vein, a "video" podcast which is just web cameras on the hosts doesn't move the needle and is really unnecessary.

 

I do know people that like to listen to shows via Youtube (very simmilar to what Kelly has done actually - still pictures, or something of the like), but that's while they are multi tasking at work - they aren't flipping back to make sure they can see ugly mugs bantering on about RAW.

Posted

Don't wanna typecast, but when I think of fan video, I immediately think of something like "DXfanz316" opinion on this week's NXT, mouth-breathing all over his webcam with ROH posters and WWE action figures all over his bedroom wall. Don't see how seeing what the hosts look like adds anything to the show. Even though I'm positive all of you suave fellas here are a step up from the stereotype :)

Posted

the OSW Review guys don't show themselves on camera, for what it's worth

 

i do think there's a lot of value in putting your stuff on Youtube simply because it's such a larger platform, but you can just throw your audio podcasts on there!

Posted

yeah Im not talking about seeing the hosts, just audio over video . The images imo just enhance the experience

what better than listening to Will,Chad and Johnny discuss Uncensored 1996 than accompanied by images of the Booty man handing Hulk and Macho rubber frying pans

Posted

Any news on when the HOW feed of podcasts return to PTBN like Wrestling with Optimism & History of Wrestling? Also, while they don't need to do video podcasts, maybe posting YouTube videos of when they attended the live events like a couple of quick clips. Last time they did something like that was WrestleMania 30.

Posted

Well, here's something new, more Mystery Science Theatre than commentary, but have a look:

 

 

We did a watch-along audio show and this thread made me have a brain wave.

 

So let us know what you think and if there's interest, we could make it a regular thing.

Posted

Well, here's something new, more Mystery Science Theatre than commentary, but have a look:

 

 

We did a watch-along audio show and this thread made me have a brain wave.

 

So let us know what you think and if there's interest, we could make it a regular thing.

watching now Parv

Posted

It's easier said that done. I have chemistry with Kelly built up over 50+ shows, just as Justin has chemistry with Scott and Graham has chemistry with this lads.

 

Watching footage while talking is not like doing a regular podcast, and needs that chemistry already to be in place. And while we might have done guest spots on each other's shows over the years, we move in different circles.

 

I say this from experience. The first time Chad and I "met" Will and Johnny on a show was during an AWA watching party. It was awkward as hell. I've now done dozens of shows with Will and Johnny and could talk to them while watching any footage. But it takes time to build up chemistry with anyone.

Posted

Well, here's something new, more Mystery Science Theatre than commentary, but have a look:

 

 

We did a watch-along audio show and this thread made me have a brain wave.

 

So let us know what you think and if there's interest, we could make it a regular thing.

 

You've basically done a wrestling equivalent of a Let's Play video, which is a very popular type of video that features running commentary over video games. This is not a bad thing. (If anything, this is something that should be happening a lot more with wrestling, though I suspect that rights/fair use issues might be even more of a pressing issue for wrestling than they are for games with these types of videos.)

 

One recommendation - rather than posting one long two-hour video for the whole card, you might consider breaking the video uploads up by matches, just to make them a little easier to consume and/or revisit in segments. You can always put them in a YouTube playlist to string them together into a single experience for anyone who wants to run through the whole thing in one go.

Posted

It's easier said that done. I have chemistry with Kelly built up over 50+ shows, just as Justin has chemistry with Scott and Graham has chemistry with this lads.

 

Watching footage while talking is not like doing a regular podcast, and needs that chemistry already to be in place. And while we might have done guest spots on each other's shows over the years, we move in different circles.

 

I say this from experience. The first time Chad and I "met" Will and Johnny on a show was during an AWA watching party. It was awkward as hell. I've now done dozens of shows with Will and Johnny and could talk to them while watching any footage. But it takes time to build up chemistry with anyone.

Yeah overtime is fine, but it could be done, it could be any combination. Also, I know this is out of the TOW time frame, but please you & Kelly do a video on the Tom Magee Arn Anderson match.

Posted

I think the most entertainment will come from watching whole cards, specially mostly garbage like the Cap Centre one. Something that builds and builds in its sheer crapiness . One isolated match won't have the same effect

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...