DMJ

- Rock vs. Roman was definitely a longshot because of the scheduling, but it wasn't fan fic. The Head of the Table/Tribal Chief gimmick was very much designed to keep that potential match as a pay-off. I still think it can happen, just not this year. I mean, its wrestling. Never say never. Steve Austin wrestled 2 years ago. I don't see The Rock getting injured against Cena being enough to stop him from working with Roman, even if an injury could postpone filming Fast and Furious 12 or whatever. Just like Rock vs. Brock was "in the cards" for years but never happened, Rock vs. Roman is one of those matches that is so clearly on the wishlist every year. The window is closing, but its not closed yet. - As I wrote before, this Rollins stuff is definitely a work. The Drew thing, I'm not so sure. If McIntyre really is pissed about CM Punk coming back or about the company getting behind him...I hate to say it, but someone needs to pull him aside and just tell him, "Dude, the WWE is just not that into you." McIntyre wants to be at that top, top level, it seems, but its obvious that it will never happen. Instead of being content, like Kevin Owens is, like Finn Balor seems to be, like AJ Styles seems to be, like Lashley seems to be, like Sheamus seems to be, McIntyre seems frustrated with where he is on the pecking order. Or that's at least how it appears from the outside. I doubt the company is low-balling him money-wise. A motivated Drew McIntyre is still a valuable guy to have on your roster and the WWE has no real reason to low-ball him. I think its just the age-old story of a guy who still thinks he's got a Main Event Run in him, but a company that's saying, "We want you to be like the new Kane: a gatekeeper, putting over the next generation." - One guy who I don't think will be putting over the next generation is CM Punk. My prediction is that Punk is going to be kept in a bubble. In AEW, the guy got into it with Jack Perry and Hangman Page and eventually the Bucks and Tony Khan and, according to rumor, also seemingly had issue with Christopher Daniels, Regal, Matt Hardy, and Ryan Nemeth. I bring this up to highlight the somewhat wide swath of folks that Punk seemingly didn't get along with (not to mention Colt Cabana). Even if you agree with every choice CM Punk made as an AEW wrestler and believe him to be in the right in every conflict, I still think we're talking about a guy who maybe shouldn't really be put in a position where he's gonna be in close quarters with a bunch of hungry new main eventers and random midcard guys and unproven rookies and carny old timers. I don't expect to see CM Punk getting the invite to work with the NXT talent. I don't think CM Punk is going to take some new team under his wing like he did with FTR or Ricky Starks or even MJF. I think he's coming in to work 4-5 big shows a year against the opponents that are willing to work with him and that Triple H trusts he can work with. Rollins? A company guy, through-and-through, who is trusted by management and (I believe) would be comfortable losing to Punk if that's what Triple H wants (just like he did with Cody). I'd add the name Finn Balor to the list. Selfless opponent who is seemingly content putting over whoever they want him to, no ego. I think Shinsuke Nakamura would put over CM Punk in a heartbeat because he also seems to be fine putting over whoever the boss asks him to. Then you've got Cody Rhodes. I think Cody would work with Punk, but I guess the question is whether Punk would put Cody over. I think Punk would. I don't think Reigns has any interest in working with Punk. Maybe I'm wrong. I don't think AJ Styles has any interest in working with him. I'd be curious to know if Kevin Owens or Sami Zayn would want to, but I'd expect they'd be more likely to team with him than feud with him. I don't think Triple H wants to have Punk go over the guys that are being built up for the future like Solo Sikoa or GUNTHER or Jey Uso or Jimmy Uso. I don't think they'd trust Logan Paul to work with him, just because Paul is still green and Punk is injury-prone. And, while those might all be great matches, I think Triple H recognizes - unlike Tony Khan - that you don't bring in CM Punk for "great matches" or to get your next crop of main eventers over or to build your company around; you bring in CM Punk because of the name and the controversy and then you put him in the position to tell a story and draw. And that happens easiest, with the least amount of backstage trouble, by putting him in the ring with the guys you and he trust. And, backstage, you try to give him the same treatment as Brock Lesnar and you set it up so that he's not there to "produce" Johnny Gargano or help Ricochet get to the next level or become a mentor to Bronson Reed, but there to do his business and that's it.

The Seth thing is 100% a work. As is most of the BS about this all being some big company secret. As someone else said, when you have the production team ready to go and the marketing/merchandising team ready to go, that's just not something that happens minutes before the show starts. I think the top people knew, obviously, because you have to put pen-to-paper and that means the legal department and the finance department need to know too. And I think Triple H does have an "inner circle" of trusted top wrestlers that he gave a "head's up" to and that includes Seth Rollins and probably KO and Reigns and maybe Cody now and others. It'd be a professional courtesy that I believe Triple H understands. What I don't think is true is that this is some super-lucrative CM Punk payday or that the WWE were begging to bring him back and going to do whatever it took. Yes, he's going to get paid big money. He didn't sign to an NXT deal. But is he the highest-paid guy in the locker room? No way. This is a "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" dick-waving contest between Triple H and Tony Khan. Bringing Punk back is going to help sell tickets and merch and pop a rating for sure (his appearance on RAW is absolutely must-see), but this is a company that was already doing very well in 2023 without him. They were the only real option for Punk unless he wanted to take a massive paycut to wrestle for a 3rd-tier company like TNA or try to maneuver an international deal (which I'd never heard was even considered). If Triple H/Endeavor/Vince didn't understand their leverage, that'd be crazy to me. So, I'm guessing they offered Punk a good amount of money and, yes, they're going to keep this toy in its packaging for awhile. I'm about 70/30 on him competing at the Rumble (leaning towards him not wrestling on the show). I think, instead, they'll do some sort of phony "contract signing" at the Rumble and it'll get interrupted by Seth. Then, its Seth/Punk at Mania in Punk's first match back. But I don't think Triple H or Endeavor came groveling and begging for him. I don't think they see CM Punk as some long-term cornerstone of the next 5 years of the company. And rightly so. Maybe that's where AEW went wrong too. TK was counting on Punk to be healthy and professional enough to be a core cast member on his TV shows, while WWE might recognize that this is a guy who is so much more reliable as a Special Guest Star in 2024.

- Having not seen the match, I'm not sure my criticisms really hold water but all across social media, many people are complaining about Jay White looking like a chump by losing the match after MJF had suffered a serious injury and had also already wrestled earlier in the night. One of my all-time favorite matches/endings to a supershow was when Sting got attacked early on an episode of Clash of the Champions, went to the hospital, made the big superhero comeback, but then lost his US Championship (I think) to Rick Rude, who got a lucky break by basically falling into/shoulder-tackling Sting's damaged knee. The loss was protected because Sting got to show he was super tough and willing to defend his title just hours after getting jumped and Rick Rude got the W and the title and, now that he was the champion, he was now the guy with the upperhand and champion's advantage (which made him more dangerous) in future matches even without winning the title cleanly. Why not book this similarly? Jay White gets the tainted W after MJF shows a ton of heart. Now you've got MJF chasing the title and you can put the title on him in a major episode of Dynamite or Collision or, hell, even one of those meaningless Battle of the Belts shows. Jay White has been doing a phenomenal job over the past 6 months and this just seems like such a big loss for him and with no clear future direction. - I was very glad to hear Swerve won. He's another guy, along with Prince Nana, who has had an incredible 6 months or so and needs a prolonged push as reward for it. Not sure where he goes from here, but he has plenty of momentum to carry him into his next feud. Not sure what they should do with Page going forward, but he's 32 and, IMO, he's been written off way too early.

Not gonna defend much of anything Adam Copeland has done since joining AEW as I think he's been fairly underwhelming and I think being in the WWE bubble is the main cause of that. I know in terms of money made and fame and Hall of Fame rings and etc. etc., Christian going to TNA made him look like less of a star for decades...but, boy oh boy, did Christian having to establish himself elsewhere and then re-establish himself on the ECW brand and then continue to toil in Edge's shadow lead to him not only being an all-around better worker and promo, but also a guy that simply knows how to get over as a top guy no matter where you put him. You could insert Christian into just about any wrestling promotion of the past 30 years and I'm convinced he would make it work and get to at least the upper-midcard level. Also, people are quick to point out that AEW has "failed" many top talents - but, let's be real here, the veterans/ex-WWE/ex-NXT guys who have gotten over aren't just getting handed better material. They're maximizing their minutes. Samoa Joe, CM Punk, Bryan, Mox, Jericho, Christian, Sting, Billy Gunn, Jarrett, Adam Cole since his comeback, Swerve since he's got his recent groove, FTR have all been successful...Its easy to say, "Well, TK dropped the ball on Aleister Black, Andrade, Miro, Keith Lee, Jeff Hardy, and so forth," but some of those guys have clearly been checked out at times (or, in Jeff's case, beyond checked out). We may bicker about the right or wrong way to use Danielson or whether or not Mox sucks or how tired Jericho's shtick is, but you can't argue the workers themselves been lazy. And, surprise surprise, they're all very over with the AEW crowds. They give a shit or at least fake it very well. But...bringing it back to Copeland, I think the reason he's had his back turned to the hard camera is because he's used to working in front of arenas that are all-the-way full. He has a natural inclination to want to speak to the fans in attendance and, when you're working RAW and SmackDown and WrestleMania, you're going to see lots of faces in every direction you look. Based on the pictures I've seen floating around the internet, that has not been the case recently for AEW so you have guys "playing" to an empty camera-side. Still, the jury is still out on him (for me). I think he's going to really, really have to step it up with his creativity - his in-ring work is actually the least of his issues and that was never even a real strength - and he's going to have to give a shit. On the plus side, I do think he is a legit wrestling fan and wants to do well. I don't think he's pulling a "Booker T-in-TNA" and just there for a check. But you can't come in and not tweak your act a bit. You've got to offer something somewhat new or fresh to make it work. Using lines from late 90s WCW and referencing The Rock is not that.

Yup, his kayfabe brother Kane. I don't consider Taker to be some all-time great worker, but he has at least 10 matches that I would consider very good-to-great against Foley, Michaels, Bret, Lesnar, Angle, Batista, Edge, etc. Throw in some good multi-man matches and Taker's resume is perfectly respectable. Not good enough to be in the GOAT discussion, but fine. Kane, on the other hand, only had good matches when they were multi-mans and his best singles matches aren't anywhere near as good as Taker's best matches. Even going through my own spreadsheet of reviews, the highest-rated singles matches I have for him were against Daniel Bryan (a match that many, many people completely shat on at the time but that I found to be pretty fun in a goofy way) and a 2002 match against Triple H that I still basically said was "above average but not must see." So, while I think we all could somewhat safely agree that Taker had at least 6 great singles matches, I don't think we'd ever reach a consensus on whether Kane has had even one great singles match.* His ceiling was just "good." I pretty much hate Kane, but he had perfectly fine matches against guys like Rey Mysterio over the years. I just don't think any of them were truly great. * I will readily admit that I haven't seen or reviewed every Kane match ever. Maybe one of the Austin matches during the title switcheroo in 98' was really good? I remember those being more "angles-presented-as-matches" than "real" matches, though.

Haven't been watching the weekly shows and totally forgot/didn't realize this show was happening. Still gonna check it out while I do my exercising (as I do with all WWE PLEs). These "minor" shows have been over-delivering, but this still feels like maybe the slightest show the WWE has put on in awhile - more like a stacked SmackDown or RAW card than something that they used to charge $30-$50 to see. Only 5 announced matches too? Is this show not supposed to go the usual 3 hours? Even if they give every match 20 minutes - which would be well more than most need - we're only talking about a 2-hour show max. Where are KO and Sami? GUNTHER? Are Drew and Sheamus injured or something? No Rhea match either? Why not use this show to maybe debut a new wrestler from NXT? The star power in the tag matches is certainly enough to get good attendance, but I dunno, this show could've really been rounded out better.

- I don't expect anything to be on MAX tomorrow. For starters, the MAX sports tier doesn't launch until October 5th (Thursday). As far as I know, its a pretty "soft" launch too unless I missed some big announcements of major sporting events they will be airing in October. Basically, its just whatever they were airing on TBS/TNT already unless I'm mistaken. Nothing truly exclusive yet. Based on the little I have read, it seems like Warner Bros. is looking to expand their NBA coverage, which makes a ton of sense considering the history there. I could see AEW not launching until Full Gear in November or even later (depending on what their deal is with Bleacher Report/FITE/whoever else is handling their PPVs). Also, I don't think "pissing off fans who paid $50" is a real worry even if he were to announce that all the AEW stuff would be on there by the week's end. The fact that this is the 3rd PPV that AEW has had within 7 weeks leads me to believe that he doesn't lose too much sleep over his fans' spending habits. And what would those fans, who are seemingly the biggest and most engaged, really be complaining about? They'd be upset for about an hour and then they'd be the first to sign up just like the majority of WWE PPV buyers did for the Network and Peacock. That core audience is not going to be chased away by paying for a show like this (which should be very good, considering the card). - I really hope there's not too much expectation for Edge to show up. I'm not expecting him to show, though having Darby/Christian closing the show seems like a hint that he may be there. If he's not appearing, one does have to wonder why TK would position that match at the end of the show when Danielson/Sabre is almost guaranteed to be great, Danielson is still the most consistent "big match" performer on the entire AEW roster and maybe on any roster, and you're in Seattle, which may not be as meaningful to Danielson (Aberdeen is 2 hours away), but is still probably going to fully and passionately behind the Dragon as a "home state" guy.

- I'm not sure why people assume Edge would challenge for the World Championship. To my eyes, it seems like the booking strategy right now is to continue to milk the story with Adam Cole and seem to be building to Strong/MJF with Cole as a guest ref or playing some big factor. Maybe they're holding out in case Kyle O'Reilly can come in soon? Also, is Page/Swerve a No. 1 contender's match? Either guy seems like they could be an interesting challenger for Max on a big TV show. - As for Edge...if I were TK, I'd book him right into the tag division. FTR have been talking about being the best tag team of all time, have Edge debut and Christian convince him to go after FTR and prove them wrong. Supposedly, FTR are pretty tight with Edge so there's plenty of trust there. I think you could easily do a story where its sort of FTR (babyfaces) vs. Christian (Heel) and Edge (Babyface who is partnering with Christian out of obligation/loyalty and is a bit uneasy about it, but also wants to prove that he and Christian are the real best tag team ever). FTR wins and you segue into a Christian/Edge feud on TV. If I'm not mistaken, Edge was a big Sting fan and you could potentially get to a Sting/Edge/Darby vs. Christian/Luchasaurus/Random Heel Who Hates Darby (which is basically every heel on the roster) that way. Also, just based on his last run, my guess is that Edge wants to work against some of the top guys he didn't work extensively with and "missed" during his retirement - Omega, maybe Moxley, maybe Claudio, and, yes, maybe MJF and Cole too. But I don't see TK just hot-shotting the title onto a 49 year old who will likely be working a very limited schedule when, historically, I think TK has more often than not brought in a relatively big name only to let them languish a bit in the midcard/upper midcard rather than give them an immediate main event run (Aleister Black, Andrade, and Keith Lee come to mind...)

Definitely some interesting news out today... - SmackDown back on USA is obviously a huge development. On one hand, going from broadcast back to cable seems like a step back for the company...but supposedly they got a huge deal that I've read is up 40% (approximately $1.4 billion) from their previous deal. That's just bonkers to me. FOX was overpaying for it network TV, but somehow its worth more to NBC/Universal? Will it become a 3-hour show? - RAW (and NXT, which could easily just back to being a streaming-only show) is supposedly going to be on the market and there's no guarantee that it will stay on USA. Again, its a bit confusing to me. Yes, its the "flagship" show...but SmackDown became the A-show once it went to FOX and the thrust of the company became the Bloodline story for the better part of 2 years (with even Cena doing mostly SmackDown appearances whenever he'd come back) and I'm not sure what other cable channels are trying to land it. - ....which leads to whether Amazon or some other streamer will do a big bid. I mean, Amazon has the money to outbid anyone if they so choose. I always had the feeling, though, that Vince, for as forward-thinking as developing the WWE Network was 10 years ago, still believes very strongly in the ubiquity of old fashioned cable television. I think Vince would rather get $750m to keep Raw on a cable channel than he would take $1 billion to put it on Amazon. - But now it seems Vince may be straight-up cashing out? Gotta love that move. Pull off every trick in the book to essentially re-take control of the company, make a massive deal in which you come out the biggest winner over your own daughter and son-in-law, and then basically walk away having not only all the moneys but also one last showing of rrrrrrrruthless aggggrrrresion to the Board that tried to boot you over your insatiable sex drive.

I would be very surprised if he goes back to the WWE. I mean, maybe Paul Heyman could play dealmaker here, but I don't think Triple H wants to deal with Punk's ego and what it could mean in the locker room and the only reason I think Vince might show any interest is just to get one-up on AEW. But, to be honest, they just pulled a huge rabbit out of their hat on Friday with The Rock showing up. It did a huge rating. They also have Cena working semi-regularly. I'm a CM Punk fan, but the WWE is not a company that needs star power right now. It took a minute, but the WWE's depth chart is probably the best it has been in many, many years, and, if I'm not mistaken, attendance and ratings being generally up are proof that more and more talent is getting over. Roman and Cody are obviously over. Zayn and KO get big reactions. Jey Uso is over. Seth Rollins and Finn Balor are as over as they've ever been. GUNTHER is over. LA Knight's act may not have legs, but its over right now. Solo Sikoa is on the brink. Montez Ford is still just a couple break-out moments away from being a can't-miss singles star. Damien Priest is right there. As silly as it may sound, I think there's still potential in Omos. And then you've got vets like Sheamus, Miz, Lashley, Nakamura, Rey, and others who, when needed, are still capable of knocking it out of the park. Plus, Orton and Brock potentially back as part-timers? And, jeez louise, the women's division. There may still be a big gap between the top women (Asuka, Becky, Charlotte, Bayley, Rhea, Bianca) and the rest (Zoey, Liv, Shotzi, Shayna, everyone in NXT), but that's still a very loaded group and, if I'm not mistaken, Asuka is the only one over the age of 40. So, yeah, its never a bad thing to have even more big stars on your roster and CM Punk certainly qualifies, but this is not the same WWE that CM Punk supposedly turned down in 2020/2021. This is a WWE with lots of momentum, firing on all cylinders, and with at least 3-4 guys who are much bigger stars now than they were 2 years ago. In that sense, CM Punk's value has never really been lower.

I'm hoping for the best for her but am bummed she's leaving AEW. She was always bright spot on the show to me. I'm also wondering what TK was thinking having her come back last week and lay everyone out if he had any reason to believe she might be leaving. Did she play him? If so...I dunno. I almost always side with wrestlers over promoters and I don't think Jade did anything wrong necessarily because it is a business and there are two sides to everything, but still, if she led TK to believe that she was re-signing, got booked accordingly, and then told him, "Actually, I'm bouncing," that's a kinda shitty thing to do. Especially 'cuz I feel like last week, she gave an interview and said that AEW had treated her well. Plus there was some talk last year - or maybe it was more like 2 years ago now? - that Danielson had taken her under his wing a bit and was working with her. I kinda wanted to see her blossom in AEW just because AEW's women's division needs capital-S Superstars like her. I'm not sure she's ready to get "the rocket" yet on the main roster in WWE, but NXT was a great training ground for Bianca and others and she definitely has "it." I hate to play the pessimist, though, but I could also see this being the beginning of the end. In AEW, she shined because the talent level (in general) is much lower than in the WWE and the talent she worked with most were very clearly working to make her look great in the hopes that, if they did that well enough, maybe they'd get a shot of their own just by playing plucky underdogs against the dominant heel. In NXT/WWE, I could see there being possibly a less "cooperative" locker room. Obviously, everyone's a professional and I don't think anyone's going to shoot on her, but ultimately, if you can't hold your own against a Bayley or even a Nikki Cross (let alone Charlotte or Becky), the agents/producers can only do so much with you before they move on. We just saw that exact scenario play out with Lacey Evans, a "can't miss prospect" that got a few chances but ultimately fizzled out because...well...she wasn't good enough to hang.

Ehh. Around these parts, Mox is not considered very good. But when I found this place 10ish years ago, I was shocked to read the many, many posts about how overrated Kurt Angle and Shawn Michaels are. Some of the takes here can be jarring to read at first, but in many cases, the valid criticisms are stated so eloquently that they might make you rethink your own opinion. That's a good thing. Ultimately, though, even the most objective reading of entertainment/art doesn't hold up against the visceral emotional response. For example, yes, objectively, The Ramones buzzsaw bubblegum punk is not as musically complex or rich as Dream Theater's more progressive rock. But one band kicks ass, blew my mind when I was 12, and will never not make me smile and the other is...well, I'll just say, not for me. So, yea, people can shit on Mox all they want and, to be sure, if you put his matches and moves under a microscope, you're going to see lots of flaws. I'll also add that I think his current ring gear sucks too and he probably shouldn't be working as much as he does because I think he should have a stronger aura/mystique. But when the music hits, he's clearly very, very over with the AEW crowd and if he came back to WWE, he'd be very, very over with the WWE audiences too. The guy connects with the general wrestling audience in a huge way. This is the same conversation many of us had about Rob Van Dam and Jeff Hardy 15-20 years ago. Sloppy? Predictable? Did lots of meaningless dangerous things to pop the crowd but lacked real psychology? None of this is new and none of this takes away from these guys' popularity and star power.

I watched the video and I'm not sure that less than 10 untelevised seconds of holding his arms up and circling the ring 1.5 times is that big a deal. Hell, I like the Young Bucks much better as heels (if they're going to be on TV at all, which I'm kinda indifferent about generally) and, in Chicago, that's what they're going to be. Might as well lean into it. The fans in attendance want to engage in this sort of stuff. I sure as hell loved chanting "You Screwed Bret" at Earl Hebner and Shawn Michaels for years after 97' and, in Canada, Shawn sure as shit - even after becoming born again - still didn't seem to mind getting that heat. (And Shawn, post-return, may not have been an executive, but he certainly had some stroke.) But I'll refrain from the what-aboutism and say this... I'm with many here and am definitely bummed that CM Punk is gone and that Collision is likely to become just another version of Dynamite - which is what Rampage was/is - and that it will not have that different "flavor" that set it apart. That being said, pro-wrestling hasn't been run "like the outlaws days" in at least 25 years and the rosters of today are not the rosters of 25 years ago, let alone 35. CM Punk was at the Cauliflower Alley convention and mentioned that Harley Race, Roddy Piper, and Dusty Rhodes all loved him - and that's great and wonderful - but that type of "old school respect" is from guys who worked in an era where being legitimately tough was a prerequisite, where you had to personally iron out contracts and deal with back-stabbing promoters and back-stabbing colleagues, navigate a culture that was filled with sharks and legit criminals. I know the wrestling business isn't perfect in 2023, there are still horrendous things happening (the #MeToo stuff made that abundantly clear), but its really romanticizing the past to say that things were better when punishments were doled out by "the boys" and might include sodomy, being forced to do torturous exercises at the risk of injury, or having your personality property defecated on because you forgot to shake someone's hand or were eating chicken in the locker room. CM Punk physically assaulting somebody for letting an errant "shoot" comment out on a YouTube pre-show is 100% uncalled for, hard ass, thin-skinned bullshit. I'm not saying "violence is never the answer." I'm all about punching Nazis and bigots and actual real-life villains who routinely support and defend fire-bombing churches and racial genocide, but I don't think a workplace conflict over whether or not someone should use real glass for a wrestling match quite measures up. I don't know about you, but I don't come to blows with my co-workers when they use my coffee mug without permission. CM Punk resorted to physical violence over a workplace spat because (a) he wants to show he's a tough guy, (b) he knows Jungle Jack Perry is not a tough guy, and (c) he seemingly feels like any slight against him needs to be handled through physical violence. And then supposedly threatening (verbally, gesturally, or by lunging at) your boss - well, c'mon now, that's just not going to fly in the corporate wrestling world. A world that CM Punk has existed in and knows the rules of for a long, long time and a world that CM Punk has prospered in financially and, at times, creatively. When he's been able to. Which he seemingly can't anymore. Yet there are still people who think CM Punk, who clearly has serious anger management issues, should somehow still have a job despite his serious anger management issues being a recurring problem that lead to suspensions, investigations, bad press, lawsuits, having to re-book events, etc. Like, I get it, I really enjoy CM Punk too as an on-screen character, but you have to be being willfully obtuse to think CM Punk is somehow owed any more chances or was not being an overly aggressive asshole for physically attacking a 26-year old midcarder for showing bad judgment on a YouTube preshow. That to me makes CM Punk look like a child. What the Bucks (who I honestly don't even really like) did? That's just good heel crowd work.

- I too am of the belief that this Perry/Punk is an angle. Just seems to me like Punk and Perry had a slight conflict weeks ago, the story leaked and turned into a big news item even though it was a nothingburger, the "IWC" overreacted, and now Punk and Perry are, like, "Well, if its that easy to work the reporters and the fans, let's just do it." If its true that Punk wants to make money off of the heat with the Elite, but they don't want to work with him, I can totally see him reasoning that if the Elite won't do it, he might as well do it with someone else. I don't even think they're "working the boys" - I think everyone is pretty much hip to it and Miro was just being a little scamp by saying it didn't happen on Twitter because, shit, I dunno, maybe he just finds it all so stupid? - Bringing in Edge to do anything with the Hardys would be awful. I'm far from the biggest Edgehead - in fact, I think he's about as mid as they get - but if I'm bringing him in, I'm doing E&C vs. The Bucks, E&C vs. FTR, Edge vs. Omega (because it does seem like Edge has a boner for working against this generation's "best" workers, specifically AJ and Seth during his last run), and then whoever else Edge wants to work, which I would assume would be folks like Adam Cole and Darby as they seem to be the guys that get name-checked the most. Oh, and E&C vs. Sting and Darby could work too because I imagine Edge might want to scratch that name off his bucket list. But neither Matt or Jeff Hardy is even in the top 30 guys I'd like to see Edge have any involvement with and, honestly, I'm not sure there is even that much nostalgia for it anymore. To me, there's far more intrigue in doing "dream matches" with the younger talent.

Wow. I'm at a loss of words as well. But I'll say this... So sad to hear just because he was still such a young man - 36 years old - and, say what one may about his ideas or his matches or whatever, I don't think anyone could say that this dude didn't love pro-wrestling and strive to entertain and bring something unique to it. I know I haven't always been kind when talking about his stories and his matches, but I never doubted his intention: to entertain his many, many fans and to do something that people talk about and remember. And, yeah, sometimes it veered into the ridiculous, but also, for every "bad idea," there was something like the Firefly Funhouse match with Cena that I thought was absolutely terrific and bizarre and weird and unforgettable and made me laugh and smile. RIP Bray Wyatt. A guy who could strike out 9 times in a row, but still had me wanting to see his 10th at-bat. And I know that's not the nicest thing to say maybe, but damn, as far as what we know about him as a person away from the gimmick, he seemed to be well-liked and someone who rooted for his friends and was a good person. Just terrible, terrible news.

Only halfway through, but if they don't give Ospreay the win, Tony is crazy. As someone who really only watches WWE (PLEs) and AEW TV shows, I'm that 40 year old fan that basically watches the most easily accessible stuff via a Peacock subscription and Hulu Live. I've seen a handful of Will Ospreay matches and probably none of the ones that I should've or would be considered top tier. I don't think I've heard him cut a real promo that wasn't hyping a Forbidden Door show. But that promo, that 60 seconds, was awesome. Passionate and personal and felt real. I want to see this guy every week now. I knew he was a good wrestler, but now, I'm invested in the character too.

Effortlessly charismatic and captivating. A guy who makes wrestling fun because he was always fun to watch. I mean, there's just a joy that one can have watching his work - especially personal favorites (the Flair matches in 89', for example) - that so very few other wrestlers have. He's on the very, very shortlist of best to ever have done it and, the older I get, the more and more I think he really might be the best. He made every feud, every story, every victory, and every loss feel REAL, like it really mattered, like it was always deeply personal. That didn't always result in great matches, but they still mattered because he was in them, even in the most ridiculous of circumstances like his last WCW years or the Chainsaw Charlie stuff.

- Based on her often terrible Twitter X posts (ugh), I'm guessing Lacey didn't endear herself to many backstage either. I can't say for sure as I'm not in the locker room, but sometimes it seems clear when some of the women enjoy working together and when they don't. For example, I was watching SummerSlam 2013 and Battleground 2013 for my blog and there are two Brie Bella matches on these shows - one is vs. Nattie and the other is vs. AJ Lee. Which match do you think was actually pretty good? You might be surprised to learn that the match with Nattie is considerably better and I don't think its because Nattie is some super-worker and AJ is terrible. My theory is that Brie and Nattie planned/rehearsed a match that they were both comfortable with and worked hard to make as good as possible. Meanwhile, I'm not sure if AJ and Brie - who were in the midst of a storyline in which AJ mocked Total Bellas and all the other divas for being phonies that may have struck a real-life nerve - had that same professional respect or trust and their match suffered because of it. Becky at the peak of her popularity may have been a little peeved that the best they could come up with for her after main eventing WrestleMania XXXV was feuding with a still-green ex-Marine who was getting the kind of push that Lynch - and others (Naomi, Nikki Cross, Asuka) - had all worked a comparatively much longer time to get. I could be completely wrong about that, but any which way, if that feud was designed to get Evans over as a top heel, it was an undeniable flop. - As for Theory. I don't watch NXT so I'm not sure what Triple H or the main roster writers did to "strip" Theory of his character. From what I saw, his character was about as thin as wet newspaper. He took selfies. He was vainglorious. He was young. He was yet another agile, well-trained wrestler who can do just about anything he wants in the ring from dazzling aerial moves to old-fashioned suplexes...except he can't do the single most important thing one needs: make the audience care long enough to sustain interest in a wrestling match, to care who wins or loses, to actually mentally invest. His athletic ability carried him through a few good performances and matches here and there, often multi-mans where he was blessed to be working with guys who had way, way more natural charisma (mostly Bobby Lashley, but also Ali and Rollins). If you want to talk about someone who has been stripped of what made his character interesting, my mind goes to Cameron Grimes. The little bits of his work in NXT and Impact that I saw over the years made him come across as a really fun, unique character. Plus, I found his offense to be more interesting than anything Theory does. But, really, is there any reason why they didn't just have LA Knight win the title? I'm a huge Rey fan, but if you're going to give someone the rub of beating an unpopular heel champion like Theory, LA Knight certainly could've been that guy and would benefit much more from it than Rey.

Yup. Been saying this for months now. And the other 50% he lifted from Asuka.

Yeah, I can see that - but I wish they would've had the announcers actually ask "Where's Jimmy?" instead of saying that he was sidelined from getting put through a table the previous night. I mean, by this point of SummerSlam, we'd seen multiple guys and gals take horrific bumps, weapon shots, and even put through tables and were back on their feet, competing and *winning* within minutes. If they wanted Jimmy to be attacked before the show to explain why he wasn't running out, fine, but do it in a backstage segment and have him taken out in an ambulance. Or they could make Jimmy not saving Jey from an endless 2-on-1 beatdown a question that Corey and Cole wondered aloud. I know looking for consistent logic in wrestling is a fool's errand, but the SummerSlam main event booking had less logic than usual and the match itself was nothing special, a formulaic Roman match and a lesser one at that.

- Not a bad show, but Money in the Bank was arguably the best top-to-bottom main roster show (especially if you dug the main event) that the company has put on in close to a decade or more. - I don't watch the weekly TV, but was it always going to be an "MMA Rules" match between Shayna and Ronda? If so...bad idea. Shayna and Ronda are good enough at pro-wrestling that, with the right agent/producer, I believe they could've worked a good pro-wrestling match with elements of MMA. This almost felt like a match designed to show that MMA isn't as entertaining as pro-wrestling, but who even cares about that decades-old debate in 2023 because this was fake MMA on a pro-wrestling show and, ultimately, it just made me think "This match isn't good and this show isn't good and if this is what the WWE came up with and thought would be good, I'm not interested." I have a strong suspicion that Vince or HHH or someone got very bored or disinterested in protecting Ronda and that resulted in her no longer getting the benefit of having her matches properly produced/agented (?). Because that first run, when she was considerably greener, the matches were laid out much better. There's a story there for sure. - Seth/Finn needed to be worked 25% slower because some of the best and coolest callbacks were rushed through, but they definitely had the crowd into it by the end. - Roman/Jey needed to be worked 25% faster because some of the best and coolest moments were separated by 5-6 minutes of Jey or Roman just standing around. I tend to like Roman's matches, even as others have pointed out how grueling they can be, but this match was a misfire. I think there were multiple issues at play. First, it was always going to strain credulity to believe that a lifetime tag specialist like Jey Uso was going to defeat the most dominant World Champion in 30 years even if it was conceivable in non-kayfabe terms that Roman would want to drop the title to him. That wasn't necessarily true of the matches against Drew (at Clash), Sami (in Montreal), and, most importantly, Cody Rhodes, at WrestleMania, where it seemed like there was at least some chance of Roman dropping 1 or both titles (back when there was still vagueness around whether his titles would be unified). Second, as I wrote earlier, I tend to like the "Roman formula" more than others even if it has become a formula. He beats down an opponent early, he walks around and trash talks, he gets cocky and the babyface makes a comeback only to get trounced through interference. But in this instance, that wasn't the story to tell. Jey Uso isn't bad fighting from underneath, but he's not the seller that Sami or Cody are. His gifts are his agility and speedy offense and unmatched ability to build a string of false finishes, a mix of things that helped make the Usos the best WWE tag team ever. At their best, they would work a methodical opening stretch before basically letting loose with a fireworks display. That's the sort of match that Jey excels at and that would've woken up the crowd. Seeing Jey work "Roman's match" was lackluster. Plus, even from a kayfabe perspective, Jey should know Roman's formula and style/pace better than anyone and should've had a much clearer game-plan. He was made to look like any other challenger instead of bringing anything new to the table. Third, Solo Sikoa and the No DQ/No CO stipulation. Again, not having a plan to counteract Solo when you're in a No DQ/No CO match against Roman, who you have personally helped by interfering in nearly every one of his title defenses, makes Jey look like a total idiot. And because the audience has seen so many screwy finishes with Roman, it also made making the match basically a 2-on-1 beatdown for the majority of its final third thoroughly deflating. I get that Jey can no longer rely on the backup of Sami or KO or any other babyface, that he burned too many bridges to still have any friends, and I get that the reason Roman didn't just have his cousins come in and bum rush Jey from the first minute is because Roman wanted to inflict the punishment himself and show his dominance but...man, just feels like one too many holes in the story of this match. A big disappointment when, even if Roman was leaving with the title, they could've at least offered something fresh.

Yeesh. God bless Cody for agreeing/wanting to work with Wyatt, but, man, what a poor decision. I think there was a news blurb many moons ago about Roman not wanting to be involved in anything with Wyatt, correctly seeing that it would force him to do corny overacting the same way he watched Seth and Cena do. For Cena, I'm in the minority that thought the feud worked - but mostly because Cena was way more of a "Hulk Hogan"-type: objectively uncool and geared towards kids. The jorts. The jingoism. The over-the-top "I'm just having fun" attitude he gave off even in feuds that should've/could've been more serious. I think Cena also relished in getting to tap into that Dungeon of Doom cheesiness in a way that Brock or Roman don't see their characters doing. (The same way, say, Ronda would've probably balked at working with Bray while Alexa Bliss saw it as being an opportunity to do something weird and creative, for better or worse.) Seth Rollins had to pilfer pieces of Asuka and Nakamura's acts to reinvent himself after his ill-fated Wyatt feud. And, as much as I've always been willing to acknowledge that Wyatt has his fans and his appeal and that, done right, there's money in the act: if you peruse places like reddit or the "Twittersphere" (gag), where Wyatt had consistently been praised by a respectable amount of fans, he is significantly less popular than he was before his last comeback. It really seems like his defenders were willing to stay on his bandwagon until this last run, which was just so objectively shitty that it is now near-impossible to be a fan of the character. Even his staunchest ride-or-die fans seem to have gone into hiding as, whether its accurate or not, there is a feeling that Bray was given an opportunity to do his whole Wyatt 6 story but that every element we saw was incredibly stupid and lame. I think lots of his fans and those of us who were sometimes on-the-fence about him no longer care that he didn't get to execute his "full vision" because even the glimpses we saw were supremely cringe. Most fans recognize we don't need to eat a whole plate of shit to know what it is. The first few bites were evidence enough of what was on the menu. But good luck to Cody for seeing if he can somehow make it work. I think he'll be fine no matter what...but Wyatt will be back off TV by November.

- I didn't hate the Bloods and Guts match as much as many people here. I didn't think it was great or anything, but I guess it was exactly what I expected? I'm very far from being the most versed fan in the Elite's history, but I've always found that their version, specifically the Bucks' version, of "hardcore" matches tend to include lots of high spots that are a touch too cute and choreographed and based on athleticism rather than punishment. In certain situations, this is great fun because who doesn't wanna see someone fly off of and into a dozen ladders...but if I was looking to hurt somebody, I'd be more likely to just use the ladder to bash their brains in. For example, we saw one of the Jacksons dump thumbtacks into the ring from on top of the cage because, well, no one's ever done that before (that I've seen). The "logic" was particularly atrocious because, at the time, his teammates were actually in a prone position about to get powerbombed/piledriven. The idea is that dumping the tacks was enough a distraction to allow his teammates to then counter with back body drops onto the tacks that had been dumped...but, just like that sentence I wrote, it was very convoluted. Again, though, you don't go to McDonald's for a 4-star meal and I wasn't expected a Blood and Guts match involving the Young Bucks to not have a bunch of convoluted spots in it. - As for MJF/Cole, I don't want to see them beat FTR. I said this before many months ago with the Acclaimed: when an act is this over, you don't need them to be champions. Unfortunately, as good as they are, FTR sometimes seem a bit aimless when they're not either holding the titles or challenging for them. Their gimmick, like their idol Bret Hart's, is basically just being the best. The best means you're the champions. There's plenty you can do with MJF/Cole without them as champs, who are also absolutely killing it as the AEW Tag Team Champions right now after two back-to-back showings like they had against Bullet Club Gold. - I know its not a huge marquee match but Takeshita vs. Omega at one of the big PPV shows seems like a lock. And I'm not mad at it. We could also get Takeshita & PAC vs. Golden Lovers, which is another match I wouldn't be sad to see. Either way, its time to move on from BCC/Elite. - Lastly, on the topic of Ibushi, I'm willing to reserve full harsh judgment. He did not have a good showing, but this isn't the first time that AEW has brought someone in as a TOP LEVEL WRESTLING GOD and thrown them into a mix that wasn't necessarily their best environ. Again, I'm not super schooled in Ibushi's work, but I didn't know him to be famous for stealing the show in multi-man War Games-style matches. I compare it to the first few matches that Jay White had where, being someone unfamiliar with his work, I didn't get what the hype was about. Instead of coming in and dominating or cutting some awesome promo, he seemed like just another good hand in a company full of good hands. Now, having been put in the position of working with CM Punk and FTR, I very much get what makes Jay White terrific and have quickly become a big fan. So, yeah, Ibushi didn't wow me, but hopefully he'll have a few more matches in AEW and maybe get to do something that is a bit more in his wheelhouse?

I wouldn't say its a misfire just yet. I'm a Starks fan, but I'm not 100% convinced that he's ready to get that signature win over CM Punk, who, if we're meant to remember, is basically the Collision World Champion after his promo with the bag (has he brought that thing out again?). Personally, if I had to go with anyone, it might be Jay White. Their moments in the ring together in their 6-man really popped and felt "big." Its kind of why as much as I absolutely loved the FTR/Bullet Club Gold tag match, I'm more than ready for Jay White: Singles Star. I also think a Starks heel turn would be a step back. They just teased a Hobbs face turn (I hope its not a full one and that he's just ditching QT, but I wouldn't mind "tweener" Hobbs either). I don't need Starks back as a heel just yet. If it were me, I'd put Starks up against Miro. That's a fresh pairing between two guys and you can let the crowd decide who they want to cheer on any given night. And, as long as I'm fantasy booking, I'd put an end to the House of Black/Andrade feud as quickly as possible. I know its been years since these guys were in NXT, but this very much seems to me like an NXT rivalry now happening in AEW. One of AEW's selling points should be the fresh rivalries and this sort of booking works against that. I think House of Black would be better served continuing to just steamroll opponents as a trio and, if you're going with a babyface Hobbs, he'd make a fresh rival. Hobbs wrestling all three of the members (and then eventually having to find partners for a 6-man) sounds like potentially good TV and, at the very least, interesting TV just because you'd have a great clash in styles vs. Buddy Matthews, a potentially kick-ass hoss fight against Brody King, and then a big deal "main event" level match against Black.

MF DOOM albums are usually littered with wrestling references, but this one may be my favorite (from the song "Great Day"): "Lookie here, it's just the way the cookie tear Prepare to get hurt and mangled like Kurt Angle rookie year" Just classic, brilliant MF DOOM rhyme style with the way he purposefully mispronounces "tear" to rhyme with "here" and "year," but then also has the uncanny internal rhymes of "hurt" with "Kurt" and "mangled" with "Angle" and "lookie" with "cookie" and "rookie." Just an insane amount of rhymes/assonance within two lines. Anyway, here's the song in all its glory: Madvillain - Great Day