Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Matt D

DVDVR 80s Project
  • Posts

    13087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matt D

  1. That's fair, but there are different aesthetic elements and then there are completely non-aesthetic elements. I think you can categorize the first and find some sort of common ground, while I think the second is arguing about something completely different. "This match had great matwork!" "But it didn't draw money!" is a different argument than "This match had great matwork!" "But it didn't go anywhere!"
  2. i think the main reason for some level of criteria is that it's annoying for the sake of arguments/conversations if person #1 goes "Well, this match is obviously better than this match because of X." and person number #2 goes "This match is obviously better than this match because of Y," where person 1 ignores Y completely and person 2 ignores X completely. That's just not compelling to me. You have people talking about completely different things. There's no common ground for discussion in that case so what's the point of this as a social activity past making a list.
  3. I'm excited for the GOAT project mainly because it means I get to put Taue on and leave the other three off.
  4. I was in Boston the next week for Nitro right before my 17th birthday. That was fun, but it was also Boston. Not quite the same.
  5. This isn't really my sort of thing, BUT after listening to you guys talk, were I to offer a suggestion I'd say go for two lists, just like Loss has defined when it comes to the GOAT stuff. The WON style for the drawing/important/influencial, etc and then the PWO GOAT sort for the greatest aesthetically.
  6. CM Punk winning in Chicago? Bryan doing the Yes! Chants on the top of the cage.
  7. I want to see this, actually. I'm going to go out of my way and watch this soon.
  8. Can I have some timeline help? I always thought that Ross got canned due to his initial flare up in 94, but Wiki said his contract lapsed and wasn't renewed two weeks the flare up. I can't find anything in the WON at this time, except for at the very end of February where Dave mentioned that Ross would be replaced by Monsoon and Stan Lane on Challenge due to the Palsy, with nothing about his contractual situation. Then, in March, Dave said that the contract wouldn't be renewed at the end of March. Which is accurate? Was he not renewed before the flare up happened or was he not renewed only after it happened? He was hired back during the steroid trial for two months only because that's how long they figured Vince would be busy for it. Can someone clarify this?
  9. Martin, Kelly, and I are on a fairly similar wavelength (if I can be bold enough to say, though no one's quite as crazy as me), so if Charles is going to aim things in my direction, we'd be okay with that. For everyone else, it might just serve as a good jumping off point.
  10. Austin leaving in 02 is frustrating. I hadn't looked at those results for a long time, but he was basically set up to be in a bunch of matches with Eddy and Benoit, with Arn liberally interfering during a few matches with Flair here too. Once he left the Benoit/Flair/Eddie/Arn situation never came to be as they hotshotted Flair into babyfacehood.
  11. My only stopping point is that I don't feel confident starting til January or at least December, but if you two are okay with that, I'm more than happy to work through it with you guys. We're not always on the same page but we do speak the same language, I think. Charles can be our guide.
  12. I don't think we quite got to that level. Not for lack of trying though!
  13. Matt D

    Current WWE

    I almost ended up going tonight. It would have been my first show since 03 or 04, but it wasn't in the cards. Let's see if I regret not going.
  14. You're right, of course, but I find the juxtaposition between your name and your statement funny.
  15. I'm a huge fan of Bonema, but I sort of agree with Dave that he really would have only worked in Portland. There was such a cozy, familiar, local feel to Portland between the sponsors who you knew as well as the wrestlers and Sandy Barr's flea market.
  16. Here works.
  17. Matt D

    Current WWE

    It does hurt when you're using that as a crutch, instead of elevating other people into that spot. That's a valid point. It's not that there isn't an upside to Show in that position, but it's probably less than the upside to putting someone else there.
  18. I don't disagree with you. I just don't think there's anyone more reviled than Dunn except for Russo when it comes to wrestling fandom, which probably makes him an argument that would be more of a headache than it's worth for Dave to make.
  19. An ECW Pitbull (dogface gremlin?) puppy dies every time Steve Austin says something positive about Kevin Dunn.
  20. Martin, Once we hit January or so, let's do a mini joshi project or something.
  21. I have so much Stan Hansen to watch.
  22. How about Kevin Kelly then?
  23. Is it the entire point of this site that someone can argue exactly that and if they do it well enough, they will be listened to and respected even if they don't sway you.
  24. I'm mostly kidding. I'll obviously watch whatever I feel like I need to and fill in holes. That said I will probably go to certain people for advice on certain areas because even with a few years leadtime I have to be smart with my time.
×
×
  • Create New...