Matt D

How much credit should Chyna get for even how over Hunter was in 97-98?

I never heard about Lawler intending breaking away in 83. Is there more written online about that?

I like watching Warrior but only in specific situations. I love Warrior in tag matches on the apron. He's nuts. I kind of like watching Warrior matches and seeing how well you can pick out that he's following direction. I haven't seen a Mongo match in years but he's a guy that honestly loved wrestling. It's hard to hate that.

I think there are elements that I am drawn to in every match and it comes down, in the end, to "good, consistent storytelling." But I'm not a robot. That's just one element of one element of pro wrestling. I will say this. I've been catching up on NXT and I just saw the promo for the april show where Dusty books four title matches and the fact that they called it Clash of the Champions made me outright GIDDY. Just seeing that on the screen.

It feels like a Dick Ebersol sort of decision to me.

Matt Hardy vs Edge?

I'd be curious if he felt stifled creatively in WWF. It had such a different pacing to it. They'd run 2/3rds of a year of house shows off of basically one angle. In Crockett he had to come up with ideas almost constantly. WWF was such a slow moving train in comparison.

John, I know you posted on how you don't have time to watch wrestling right now since you are watching so much other stuff, etc. As blisteringly entertaining as this was, I still would have rather seen you watch some stuff you haven't seen before and write about it. Might I suggest the 79-80 Portland that's currently online.

All of that would be a much bigger issue if we weren't getting really good matches every week on TV right now and didn't have so many B-C shows where they can dump good stuff like Main Event right now.

I think Bret's early tv defenses are very interesting. Berzerker, Shango, Kamala, Virgil all within a few week period, all in pretty short matches that I actually don't think did him any favors though they were supposed to make him look like the most fightingest champion ever.

I was thinking the same thing.

I watched as much AWA TV as I could find, all the way into 86-87 or so. Full years, really. When I got to 88-89, it was available, but I just gave up.

Portland - Martel vs Wiskowski - 2/3 Falls - July 12, 1980 Buddy is sent to the back at the beginning. They start with a cool criss cross I haven't seen before where Wiskowki falls vertically and Martel runs over him the long way before going down into a Wiskowski headlock base. Martel hopes out with rope running and a headscissors but crashes hard into the ropes/corner on a body press and Wiskowski puts it back on. Second hope spot is rope-running, two leapfrogs and a sunset flip but Wiskowski kicks out and slaps on a headlock takeover and another headlock. Third hope spot is Martel turning it into a top wristlock but he ends up in a headscissors. He headstands out, but Wiskowki is right on him in the corner. He dismantles Martel for a minute and then goes for a suplex but Martel counters with a front facelock and reverses it into a suplex of his own. Wiskowki hangs on to the facelock though and Martel sells it huge. Martel gets back to his feet but Wiskowski is grinding the hell out of the headlock. This is slow steady stuff, a lot of jockeying for position. Martel hits another suplex but Wiskowski doesn't let go. It's almost like a reverse cravat here. It's a little dubious, selling-wise, but it's really just hanging on and I'm generally okay with it, especially because on the third one he finally breaks it and takes over for a moment with a backbreaker. Martel puts his head down and pays for it, but reverses again soon after and fires away on Wiskowksi in the corner. Martel puts on a headlock of his own but gets a back suplex for his trouble. Ed goes up to the top rope, hits the swandive headbutt and that's the first fall. Basic but well-worked stuff. Good heel-driven first fall. Ed starts the second fall with a full on cravat. Martel bodyslams out but sells his head and back. Ed gets up selling his own back, just enough for Martel to fight back against the ropes. He's still groggy enough that Wiskowki recovers, punches him down and puts on a leaning chinlock. Martel fights out and goes for a cross body block but gets caught and slammed and knee-dropped. Wiskowki covers but Martel gets both knees up and claps them on his head, taking back over. This is pretty back and forth. Martel beats on him a bit and goes for another cover but this time Wiskowki does the head clap. Martel reverses a pile driver. They do some more stuff. Martel puts on an abdominal stretch. Wiskowki flips out of it. This has a lot of action but none of it means all that much. Martel finally targets in on the back. Wiskowki goes for a sort of lame dropkick, gets caught and Martel puts it into the crab but Wiskowki gets to the ropes. Sandy bar steps on him since he's only touching it and Portland is weird that way but he pulls himself back. Wiskowki gets an eye poke in, tosses Martel into the corner. Martel reverses it, hits a 'rana into a pin and that's the fall. This wasn't what I'd call a great fall. The come out quick with the third fall with Martel getting the advantage and a few near falls. Wiskowki does a roll up out of the corner, with tights but just gets a two count. Martel does a couple of weirdly missing dropkicks the second one hitting Barr in a weird but kind of interesting visual. Then Wiskowki hits this great elbow on Martel while he's on all fours then hits a headbutt off the second rope onto the back of Martel's had. While he's going up, Barr calls for the bell saying that he was pulled into the dropkick. Martel retains the belt. This had good action at times and some good storytelling here and there but ultimately, I don't think it was a great match, just like I don't think that Martel vs Race from the very end of 79 was a great match. The Rose matches absolutely are. I think that says more about Rose than Martel in 1980.

88 JCP is a total blind spot to me. I just went to Graham's list and scanned for names that were there for any decent amount of time that would make sense. Brad Armstrong made some sense to me too. Or even Sullivan who could have had fun with it was an outlet for spreading his message. He'd want to keep the belt so he had TV time each week, etc.

Who'd be better, Al Perez or Rotunda?

You have to remember that in late 93-early 94, business was so bad that they were advertising little tiny bumpkin house shows on Raw, not with a list at the bottom of the screen but worked right into the main commentary of Raw, not in the old syndicated way. Some of the shows they spent a decent amount of time talking about surprised me.

Especially when it's your audience, the people who give you your livelihood, your flock.

Kotter aged great. It's all about wordplay and Marx Brothers' influence.

That wasn't a typical crowd but both they and the announcers were into it. That said, Titus got a pretty big bark chant last week when people thought he'd be the one to hit his finisher at the end of Raw.

I'm about an hour and change into this and my biggest take away is that I'm excited for Charles to see more Buddy Rose. Also, the PR set feels like a surprise announcement in some way and I'm looking forward to it.

No idea how that double post happened. Sorry. Since it was mentioned:

Definitely a fair podcast, though I do think the goalposts move a bit but that's on both sides and with a lack of clarity. Flair beats Bret in a GOAT poll to me. Flair beats Bret in a "who has the more impressive career" poll. I like Bret's idea of what a wrestling match should be and and how he follows through on it better than Flair's. So it's all about how you define the question I think. BUT that's not important. What's important is that this was an unquestionably fair podcast. Neither here nor there, I think an interesting counter to Flair's week that was brought up would be June 12-13, 1993. Obviously the scope of what Flair did is bigger but Bret had the 40 minute Backlund match which I think is really good, and then the three matches the next night with both the Bam Bam and Perfect matches being really good and all fairly different. I wish we had more of the Luger single matches from that June too.

When does that new era start? Patera was effective in the early 80s in the AWA and then as a heel with Heenan in WWF as a key part of the Andre feud until his arrest. How effective is Koloff after, what, 86? That basically gives him two-three years into "new era" on Patera.

To me, there always seemed like an instability to WCW's house shows, and back to JCP's as well I suppose. Anecdotally, am I alone in this or is there a sense that Crocket/Turner advertised matches that were different than what the shows actually looked like?