The Thread Killer Posted Tuesday at 02:36 AM Posted Tuesday at 02:36 AM One of the main reasons FTR left WWE to begin with is because the fed treated their Tag Division and Tag Team Wrestling like a joke and an afterthought. That hasn’t changed. If anything, it’s gotten worse. There is literally no competition for FTR in WWE. I’m not even an AEW fan but I think it would be ridiculous for them to leave AEW. Plus @sek69 is right, no way TKO pays the kind of money FTR would want to make the jump.
Stiva Posted Tuesday at 07:59 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:59 PM I imagine FTR will re-up for the reasons stated but it’s also probably a good time for them to take a few months off. Especially with MCMG and New Day likely to come in. As for DoN, yeah, that feels like the best show they’ve ever done. It just came roaring out the blocks with the opening tag and just never let up
El-P Posted 21 hours ago Author Posted 21 hours ago Hey, so Double of Nothing was awesome. Who could have predicted ? Funny though, I don't really get the feeling it was one of their greatest show ever, as it has been pimped as, just yet another great one. Although it's true it did not really had any lulls. Takeshita vs Okada was one for the ages. The stadium itself was a wonderful place for an AEW show and they should come back again and again.
DMJ Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago I'm one of those people of the opinion that it wasn't just one of AEW's greatest shows ever, but on the shortlist for best PPVs ever from any company. I didn't think a single match was a 5-star classic - certainly not Takeshita/Okada (which was very good, just not an all-timer) - but there no match was less than good and I think I was pretty conservative in my own ratings (cheap plug: Kwang The Blog) compared to some of the scores on Cagematch or that Meltzer gave. Aside from just the uniformly good-to-great wrestling, I think the show was very wisely structured, and, rather shockingly, restrained (at least in terms of AEW). There wasn't any over-the-top gore and, in the better matches, including Allin/MJF, they let things breathe between the bigger spots. I'll use a few examples to highlight my point: in the opener, we saw a flaming table spot but it actually only involved one of the four wrestlers in the match, which was smart because being put through a flaming table should be an automatic match-ender. AEW gets a ton of criticism for having guys withstand uncanny amounts of violence and kick out of the craziest moves, but that wasn't the case here. Then, when Edge busted out "Spike," it was treated like a match-ender, and not like any ol' weapon. Fast forward to the main event and, if one was actually watching and not just giving bad faith knee-jerk reactions, Darby Allin took a ton of punishment to his neck but after each big spot, MJF also struggled to make a real cover, often having to bring Allin back into the ring from the outside (like the piledriver on the steps) or reposition him or gather his own bearings. The actual finish not only played-up Darby's exhaustion but MJF finally stringing together the right move - a piledriver from the top - in the right position (center of the ring) to win the match. I'll also say, without checking on match runtimes, it felt like there was some variety there too. I really liked Ospreay/Joe and the Thekla match and Swerve/Bandido and the Stadium Stampede and I don't really know how long any of them went (aside from the Stampede being 30+ with all the entrances and hijinks) but they all felt like they got enough time without veering into repetitiveness or "self-conscious epic territory." Even O'Reilly/Mox, with its "No Time Limit" stipulation - usually a tell that the match is going to go 25+ - didn't feel too long. In fact, despite being a bigger fan of Takeshita (who had a similar stipulation match with Mox not too long ago), I think Mox and O'Reilly simply have better chemistry. I would've preferred a better, more exciting show-ending angle than the Kevin Knight turn - something that probably could've been saved for Dynamite, to be honest - but that's a small gripe based on AEW sometimes ending their shows with these big reveals/returns/debuts (which don't always pan out anyway). I don't think fans were expecting any sort of big angle at the end so I wouldn't consider it a disappointment and I'll at least give credit to TK for attempting to make Knight a bigger star by giving him that spotlight moment. Again, it may not pan out long-term, but at least he's trying to keep things fresh at the top of the card.
El-P Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago 8 minutes ago, DMJ said: There wasn't any over-the-top gore They really could not bleed in NYC because commissions are still a thing. Which is the most ridiculous thing ever. I thought the main event, although absolutely a great match, needed that *one* false finish where everybody really thought Darby was actually winning, to really put it over the top, and I feel like it did not had that. Minor quibble, really. The Kevin Knight turn was really well done, as it really was half-way predictable, but only in a way where you could see it happen *just before* it happened, because of how Knight had been acting in the previous weeks, with the almost exaggerated, performative positivity.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now