I have generally stayed out of your rating system threads and avoided debating you in general lately because I have come to accept that we view wrestling differently. No need in engaging with someone who views wrestling so far from the way I view wrestling that it won't sway my opinion one way or another. If you don't think the Dundee, Mantel Funk, Bock, Kerry, Hennig, Savage matches etc.are classics while defending garbage like Tiger Mask vs. Dynamite Kid then it only reinforces my above point.
However, when making cases for Dibiase and Flair, you have frequently used DVDVR ratings and consensus to bolster their cases. Lawler was on over 40 of the 125 matches on the Memphis set. He may have been in every Top Ten match but I am not sure about that. He has appeared on a bunch of other 80s sets and will appear on more because of the nominating crew;s love for Lawler and his great matches. It's not ok to be a hypocrite but at least you are a consistent hypocrite.
I will also add that Phil Schneider has made a (very incomplete) list at segunda caida of matches he considers great at Segunda Caida... http://segundacaida.blogspot.com/2011/03/complete-and-accurate-jerry-king-lawler.html . I will also offer the very undeniable argument that after Memphis was released, so many people turned the corner and after years of 80s sets, have praised it as their favorite and Lawler as a great wrestler after watching it.
Also you completely missed my point (or chose to ignore it as you frequently do) about the Flair-Lawler comparison. I said Lawler was the true broomstick worker, not Flair. I stand by that point. Lawler isn't your cup of tea. I get that. However to claim that he doesn't have great matches when consensus (something you love to refer to when defending Dibiase) says otherwise, I call bullshit.