-
Posts
18090 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by El-P
-
They actually did, in BTE. Several times. No, because some of the best long-term psychology and storytelling in pro-wrestling matches has probably happened during the last 5 years. Wait, no, the irony is that I don't give a flying fuck about punk rock nor what was the best year for punk rock 43 years ago or whatever. I was just referencing a period where old fuckers complained about the younger generation because "they don't know how to..." and "they don't respect the guys who paved the way before then" and whatever. Really, if you really wanted to make a serious point about it and drop the "irony" on my ass, you could have referenced the fact that punk, like it's been said in Retromania, the excellent book by Simon Reynolds, in itself had a very reactionary aspect to it, in that in many ways it was a move "back to the essence of the old rock'n'roll from the 50's". So anyway. It's still quite interesting that never before I've experienced such a huge pull-back from an entire generation toward the following generation. Maybe because I had to reach a certain age to actually witness an entire generation go by, so that the difference would be significant enough. Like I said, can't wait for the millenials to get old and shit on those zoomers who can't work and do whatever they will instead of playing video games like real pro-wrestlers used to do in the good ol' days of Kenny Omega & the Young Bucks, before WWE was sold to Disney and Triple H became president of the USA.
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
WrestleMania XX (2004) – Undertaker vs Kane Because of all Taker’s opponents we needed to see twice, they choose Kane... This is a complete revival match and angle as they return the Dead Man gimmick, complete with Paul Bearer looking really unhealthy and the entrance from Mania 14 with the druids carrying torches. This is basically the final look for Taker, the long leathery coat & hat with MMA gloves, although he’s still dressed at Diesel once the match starts. Kane wears no mask (insert random joke about Covid there) so he’s ugly as fuck and his « shocked » acting consist of shaking his head a lot (like he's confronted with the result of last's year election or something). Complete nothing match, Taker does a few of his typical run-of-the-mil stuff while Kane totally screws up a back bodydrop, does a shitty big boot and his hilarious « clothesline from the top rope » where he has landed on both his feet before his hand barely makes contact with Taker. Also, once the excitement of seeing Taker back in his old self is done, the crowd couldn’t give less of a flying fuck about this match, especially when Kane is on offense. The only thing that awakes them is Taker going for the rope-walk which is gonna get countered this time into a chokeslam attempt before a battle of the choke, which is always super thrilling to witness, really... Oh yeah, and for the first time in years, we get the zombie sit-up, which gets probably the biggest pop of the actual match. Also, Kane apparently can't kick out of the Tombstone anymore now, he's a total JTTS here... No idea why this was even taking place, it’s 2004 and this was a bad match (and just as heatless) 6 years before already. Complete nothing match not even accomplishing anything except re-introducing Taker as the old Dead Man, which reeks of character reboot for nostalgia purpose (yes, we're deep in the 00's and the past is already looking more appealing to the WWE). Waste of Mania time, especially for Mania 20 at the MSG. Kane sure was a safe worker though, in that it was always a safe bet you’re gonna get a shitty, boring match with him. I reiterate, I had not watched him in years and he’s even worst than I remembered. 4-8- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I think it was a on the KC WWF 1995 Year in Review. The most obvious spot was Shawn over-rotating on Nash's Jacknife. Nash was like "Yeah of course you're gonna do that !"
-
I just thought about that one when I was writing my previous post. Yeah, isn't that crazy ? Bret totally had a point, but then Shawn gets saddled with that old fucker for his entire champion stint and gets booed the hell out of MSG, while Bret comes back and insist on having that feud with Austin, which will end up being the most important one by FAR, and much better than anything Shawn has done during that entire time.
-
He failed miserably against Tiger Mask Misawa.
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
I for one am glad. Vince injecting himself into the scene as a "pro-wrestler" at the Rumble and then at St Valentines was a part (a big part even) of killing my WWF fandom back then. Hogan vs Vince was one of the most ridiculous and putrid vanity matches I've ever seen, and by no mean I'm a Hogan fan.- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
And honestly, he was right, it absolutely did not fit his character at all to have the young, jumping around hearthrob World champ being followed by some old guy who was not even a famous guy from the company's history (not that it would have changed anything). The only good use of Lotahrio was getting blasted by Sid.
-
The issue is that, as always with Corny, it's old stuff. Who knows, maybe you'd ask Omega and he'll tell you he was dead wrong back then and was just a young punk. And maybe he wouldn't but that would be irrelevant anyway because, again, his track record speaks of itself. I mean, Corny is pissed for stuff that happened 15, 20 years ago and stays stuck there forever (like he's been stuck with the idea that Omega is a mud-show attraction because he wrestled that kid once, years ago, and the reality of main eventing huge shows with Okada in historical matches just can't even reach him, much less make him think). The one thing I get from all of this is that pro-wrestling isn't very punk-rock at all. It's like it's 1978 all over again and a bunch of aging, balding uncool guys (ie Corny, in this case) are whining about those scrawny looking kids who don't even know how to play their guitar because they haven't been taught properly and can't for the life of them play a nice solo. And let's not even go into the "hip-hop is not real music" stuff, which unironically enough I've heard Corny say too btw. As far as *having to respect* the elders who "paved the way" and the usual bullshit, ya know, when a whole lot of them where truly awful people, I'm not sure this is a requisite either.
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
So it pretty much invalidates the fact that they were conscious of the Streak, because otherwise they would not have booked Taker in a tag-team match. OR, they did get conscious of it and they used the pretext of Jones sucking to take him out the match at the last moment.- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
No idea, but that would be quite funny. "Fuck man, you suck, let Taker & Train have a good match and you'll only show up at the end to do the one spot your sorry ass can do !" It's not like Nathan Jones lit the world on fire after that either.- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
WrestleMania XIX (2003) – Undertaker vs A-Train & Big Show What an odd match to book. Way to make Big Show nothing special at all, although that ship had sailed a long time ago anyway. It’s quite interesting that WWE (finally) moved Mania back into big stadiums each year after their peak years of the Attitude Era, making Mania mean more than it ever had before despite their constant loss of overall popularity. And I love the stadium settings with crazy entrance sets too, so that's all good for me. And there’s a crazy entrance for you as Limp Bizkit (it was really the end of the line for him in term of mainstream pop culture relevancy) is rollin rollin rollin live with a bunch of dancers to boot and Biker Taker rolls on his ride with the USA (that would need to be made great again eventually) flag. I can’t stand Bizkit but as a pro-wrestling entrance in this context and setting, yeah, it does slap. Hey, a Smackdown ref ! And Micheal Cole announcing and actually referring to the 10-0 streak ! Here we are ! And maybe the booking of this match kinda came from that very fact, that the Streak was now a really conscious thing so it was enough to just throw Taker a bunch of monsters to kill again. But unlike in the 90’s, it’s actually good ! Nothing classic at all, but A-Train was a terrific worker as showed here, he carries almost the entire load, and I don’t just mean of the match, as Big Show is late-WCW heavy and produces barely more than King Kong Bundy in 95. A-Train goes in the air for the chokeslam after about 10 seconds so you know how much these guys matter, but the match is short, dynamic (apart from a quite laughable abdominal stretch spot as if both these guys turned into I.R.S.), with Taker showing his brand new passion : shootsyle mofo ! Turning Big Show’s attempted chokeslam into an arm bar actually looked pretty damn cool. But really, it’s A-Train being a really good working big guy here, also taunting Taker as he’s not « the Big Dog ! ». Taker on fire (amazing contrast when you think about his early 90’s match, you could make a case it’s not even the same guy) doing Old School and even the flying clothesline, nothing is pretty but it’s just pretty explosive all along. The finish involves Nathan Jones of all people, yeah, remember that guy ? Me neither. Those bizarre post Attitude Era/pre-John Cena days I guess. So anyway, he’s kicking some monster’s ass and Taker does a fat Tombstone on A-Train. Short and surprisingly good and fun, from the totally over the top intro to the dynamic action with A-Train as an excellent dance partner. 4 -7- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Pathetic like an old guy who instead of enjoying himself after a great career is forcing himself to do something he hates to cater to an audience of haters, because apparently it makes him some dough. Life is too short. He's obviously not gonna change *anything* about where pro-wrestling is now nor where it's going (which is something no one knows about, and that's the exciting part). Hey, maybe he's getting some elation about hating something or someone, his track record certainly seems to indicate as much. But then again, it's a sad way of reaching for joy. If Corny and his followers get schadenfreude out of spending time watching something they hate, well, I guess to each their own... BTW, my defense of Matt really was about something I feel very strongly about pro-wrestling in general, so it's really more about this than about the Bucks themselves (I'm well beyond the idea of having to "defend" them like I would some guys I like from IMPACT for instance, the Bucks & Omega are the zeitgeist).
-
Honestly this thread is beating on a dead horse soooo much. I mean, if you want to criticize the current stuff, you can do it without referring to that old sad carny whose only activity is hate-watching for $ purposes. This is so pathetic, honestly.
-
Except there's no reason why not. No reason that pertains to real life, because big guy with muscle doesn't equal strong (nor tough); no reason that pertains to pro-wrestling as basically producing signs that are understood (and accepted) by an audience. Matt Jackson does a double nothern light suplex and it works all time (in term of execution, bumping and selling by the opponents and reaction by the audience). Therefore, there's no reason at all to say he shouldn't do this or that, unless you're applying a very limitating grid of what you *think* *should* be done in the context of a pro-wrestling match, which is what Cornette (and others) do all the time. Except it's wrong, because there's no rule whatsoever of what *should* be done. What people think are "rules" (like : a big guy should always work this way, a tag team match should be only worked this way) are basically just old habits and tropes that people think are best, usually because that's what they grew up on but also because they attribute false values (including "moral" ones) to them for strictly subjective reasons.
-
Young Rock: A New NBC Sitcom About the Life of Dwayne Johnson
El-P replied to C.S.'s topic in Pro Wrestling
About this, the most out of the blue thing ever was during IMPACT's last week show (I believe, or maybe at the PPV), maybe during Rohit Raju's match, Matt Striker goes something like "BTW there's a farmer's protest strike in India, just putting notice on that.". I guess Striker is quite an ok guy IRL, maybe. -
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
So, Flair wasn't good and Taker made a Mania match into a personal training session. Not a positive point for either in my book !- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
I saw it on Superstars. That being said, I also saw the Shawn Micheals vs Bret Hart ladder match from the same period on Superstars, as the French version had added stuff like stuff from MSG or other house shows on regular basis too (and later on some RAW matches sometimes, at least until 94/95 where things became really streamlined and we got the same exact stuff I believe). Yes, I'm aware of that and it's pretty obvious there with him blowing two key spots pretty badly. That being said, I won't detract my point about Flair later on in the decade being insanely overrated.- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
Chapter 5 : It seems like we have a winning streak going on here... WrestleMania X8 (2002) – Undertaker vs Ric Flair We’re getting closer and closer to referring to a streak, as JR mentions every year that Taker has not been beaten at Mania. It’s 2002, the last time Howard Finkel does the announcing, the Attitude Era has ended the previous year and the company is now starting its long, slow descent into the monopoly era, getting progressively less and less popular, evolving less and less, eventually looking back at pre-2001 as the apex of their History. Flair first Mania match in ten years, at 53 years old, ponder that for a minute. Yes, this is indeed one of these "dream match happening too late but it's still cool it's happening deal", although Taker and Flair had a match on TV in the Fall of 92 during the zombie era, in which Taker basically no-sold everything Flair did... Despite the fact the Attitude Era is gone, they both bump onto the table outside after about 20 seconds, so yeah, this stuff is still en vogue. Flair throws the best punches any Taker opponent has since Jake Roberts. Lots of fire too at the beginning before Taker, who’s a heel again here, takes over and it’s kinda like the previous year's match except Flair bumps a lot less. As he should, because he totally fucks up his Flair bump in the corner. In a clear sign of « we don’t think on our feet », they go back in the opposite corner with more punching so Taker can re-launch Flair so he can finally do the Flair bump, into a big boot which throws him on the outside. When you have a planned spot, you have a planned spot... BTW, Taker has short hair now and it looks odd. Still is dressed like Kevin Nash and interestingly enough, he actually does a lot of Nash spots now like the elbows in the corner, the sidewalk slam and the transition where his leg gets crotched on the top rope on a failed big boot. What is not a Nash spot however is that huge top rope superplex that is super impressive. Apart from this, it’s honestly kinda tedious to watch when Taker is on offense, beating Flair who’s bleeding like a pig and actually getting him up *twice* on pinfalls, so it kinda comes off as a prolongued squash (as if nothing really had changed in the perception Vince had of Flair since 1992, except now the excuse is that he's old and passed his prime, a terrific way to put him over, really). After the huge superplex, Flair will basically not take any other bump and just throw huge chops to the delight of the audience who reacts big for this. But really, even when they do the same counter off « Old School » as the previous year, Flair just can’t get any offense in for more than three seconds until they go outside and Flair uses a led pipe from the bike (this is no DQ). So, double blood, Flair gets a balls shot in, figure four spot follows, it’s Flair playing the hits basically as there was zero work on the legs before, but it pops the crowd and that’s Flair game. Short sell, counter with the choke leading of course into the chokeslam. Nearfall of sorts, twice... From then Taker hits the ref because whatever, gets the led pipe and it's time for the spot of the night of course, as Arn hits the spinebuster from nowhere and we get The Nearfall (which really made the whole match famous). Arn gets booted in the face to earn his money, Flair with a bunch of chairs to the back and we’re in smokes and mirrors territory. And then we get another occurence of Flair being way past his prime, as Taker can’t get him up for the Last Ride and has to put him down. Second try : Flair basically drops to the ground in a sorta « nope, not going up man » way so Taker just grabs him and gets the Tombstone for the win. Well, apart from the two huge spots (the superplex and of course Arn's), this is an *ok* match which still reads almost as a long, semi-competitive squash of an older guy. I remember back then lots of people were going gaga over it and for years to come we’ve heard the ridiculous « Flair can outwork 90% of the roster » talking point but the reality of things is that Flair screwed up his own classic bump then screwed up the finish, not once, but twice. He bled, used object shots and played a few hits (big chops, balls shot, figure four, all of which popped the crowd like crazy), but apart from this, he did not look good. The fact Flair is who he is and this is Mania and you got that awesome Arn spot factor a whole lot in this match being *crazy* overrated. Overall, it’s pretty good and enjoyable because of the star power, with one crazy great spot and nearfall on Taker (maybe the best until this point). 3-7- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Young Rock: A New NBC Sitcom About the Life of Dwayne Johnson
El-P replied to C.S.'s topic in Pro Wrestling
Nope, G.L.O.W was awesome. -
His trolling has been reported several times over the last few days.
-
Wait, so this universal sign that means "it's ok" is now a white supremacist thing ? Wow, I learned something. The way the other ref are doing it look like they are part of the Triple Threat. But BTW, with Drake's beliefs well known at this point, are all the other refs on this pics complete idiots or complete hypocrites ? I mean, it has to be one of the other...
-
Yeah, totally agree. I loved Jackie beating up jobbers during Sullivan squashes, she had so much intensity and presence. I remember her brutally bodyslamming a guy outside *while wearing high heels*. She was so badass, and looked the part too.
-
Totally agree. It's telling people are always using the Mid-South argument, totally ignoring the fact that Bill Watts *was* a racist, and the fact he tried multiple times to replace JYD by random-afro-american-worker, totally overlooking the fact JYD was a huge draw first of all because he was charismatic as fuck, not because of the color of his skin. Cornette's opinion are dated on this too. He's the guy who had such disdain for his own audience in SMW that he thought he could draw by playing the race card with a racist audience, but it failed. I think it might actually be Dragon Gate, but the process is the same, even moreso. Completely agree. There's an odd denial about the *overall* sexualization of pro-wrestling. Tanahashi drew women. No shit he did. Lacey Evans is gonna draw male viewers (older male I guess, considering where she is at right now in term of storyline). No shit. I'm extremely ambivalent about this idea of "representativity" in pop-culture as a whole anyway (which I find usually extremely hypocritical and manufactured), but that's another matter entirely. Right now IMPACT has Rich Swann and Moose feuding on top, last year they had Chris Bey and Willie Mack fighting over the X-div championship, their tag team women champ are Hogan & Steelz. I would be very surprised if that made any difference whatsoever in their audience.
-
Ole Anderson was pretty adamant on the fact Ric Flair did not know how to work properly and therefore would not draw.
-
The grand and pathetic journey of the Undertaker at WrestleMania
El-P replied to El-P's topic in Pro Wrestling
WrestleMania X-Seven (2001) – Undertaker vs Triple H The night before the Fall. The apex of the Attitude Era and the son-in-law is getting Motörhead. The Rock or Steve Austin never got even close to this entrance and you know why ? They did not need it. Meanwhile, Taker is rollin rollin rollin and WWF is rollin rollin rollin on pop culture zeitgeist for the first time since, hell, ever probably by paying for the rights of that awful Limp Bizkit song that was both shit and the shit. Like I said, it was the night before the Fall, the end of History, it’s not surprising they still believe nu-metal is the way to go 20 years later. Taker in full MAGA mode, I mean retrospectively it’s kinda hilarious watching this that anyone would be surprised about his political views. Big mistake to me in term of characterization, I hated it. I understand the Devil Taker really had damaged his aura (cf last year) and some change was needed, but Disciple of the Apocalypse Taker really isn’t doing anything for me. However, this match does, especially in the beginning. Attitude Era means Trip bumps on a table about 30 seconds into the match. He really pinballs a lot for Taker and I had forgotten that Trip was actually really good at this, especially for a guy with his frame, he was so jacked then. He’s really good with his timing too, with some swift counters. As Taker is going for the rope-walk spot, he’s shouting « Old School !» and so here we are, Taker has reached that point in WWF lore where his classic spots are just that, « classics », and doing the rope walk is basically him playing the hits. But he gets countered and thrown off the tope rope as he’s basking too much in his own legacy-wanking, that was a nice touch. Meanhile Trip is in full Flair mode with the pushing the ref/getting pushed spot. You can smell the dog & pony show for miles ahead as Trip goes for the idiotic sledgehammer very quickly, leading to more bullshit with the ref (it is not a no-DQ match), a pedigree tease into a ref bump (like, 5 minutes in) and a giant chokeslam for a good nearfall. The audience is molten, so this shit is working and this has been better than the Diesel match thus far. However, this is where we get to the silly part. Another ref bump and it’s time to walk around in the crowd and brawl toward the elevated hard-cam area. It’s fine and makes for a cool visual. That’s really what they are going after : a visual. The visual of Triple H beating Taker with chairs on a scaffold tower and then, Taker holding Trip by the throat and throwing him off. We’re getting a Mania Moment tm, see ? But the bump is actually not showed, which kinda feels like a production fuck up. Except it’s really not, as when they do kinda sorta show it on the replay, you can see Trip bumping off a mattress and this is where it is silly because it’s so obviously padded (and the fall not nearly high enough) that it loses quite a bit of its effect. When Taker throws a big elbow off the tower onto Trip, you can see the landing is bouncy as fuck. From there, the match really had lost its pace all for the sake of visuals and Mania Moment tm, and now they have to walk back toward the ring where the ref is STILL DOWN ! Really now, this is silly as hell, this is the most fragile ref ever. Bullshit aside, they work a nice stretch of more dog & pony show toward the finish, with Taker teasing the sledgehammer only to get a balls shot, then a Tombstone reversal spot (basically both old school Taker match trope at this point as well as an old WCW staple) but the ref is STILL DOWN (come on, really now ?) ! So Trip doesn’t have to kick out of the Tombstone (when you think Kane kicked out of two, how ridiculous was that in retrospect). Then probably the most memorable spot of the match as Taker goes for his brand new spot, his big time Last Ride powerbomb (hey, he’s dressed like Diesel, might as well steal his finisher too) with Trip countering with the sledgehammer (yeah, I know, but at this point you either accept the stupidity of it or you don’t) leading to a legit great nearfall, with the terrific frustration sell afterward. Taker bleeds again from this which is a nice detail touch too, which also allows Trip to work another good logical transition as he’s now punching the wound in the corner but stupidly climbs the ropes for a higher, more efficient placement, which allows Taker to do the Last Ride. It’s clearly overproduced in the sens it’s mostly a dog & pony show with a ridiculously long ref sell and the match suffers from the middle part where they sacrifice the pace for the sake of a visual aka a Mania Moment tm, which really is typical of this era (crowd brawling / big spot) and also foreshadows the style of the bigger over-scripted matches to come. As it is, I can’t say it’s better than the Diesel match (which was less ambitious but had a much better organic flow), but it’s still absolutely watchable and quite fun overall, if you don’t mind the bullshit. 2-7- 206 replies
-
- wrestlemania
- undertaker
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: