Matt D

A couple of reasons. I'm still a sucker for a Great Match and Hunter has had quite a few of them. He's not "on" as often as I'd like, but when he's on he's on. Also I haven't watched enough new wrestling (new to me, not recent) to have 100 guys that I've watched enough of and rate to honestly place above him. Same goes for other heavily flawed guys with lots of great matches that in a perfect world I'd be able to eliminate, Edge and Angle being the obvious ones. I am basically excluding Japan so I can't fault you for that. It just means you have something to work towards for the next one. I think there won't be a guy on my 100 that I feel really doesn't belong there, even with my blindspots. We'll see though.

That summed up Hunter pretty well. So why is he making your list?

I think they were pretty careful how they managed expectations with Andre relative to Brock.

Come on, Dave. It's ok you write about MMA, but don't make your lead story a compare/contrast about some UFC guy and Reigns so I can't easily skip the MMA stuff if I want to. "Luke Rockhold" is a great wrestling name though.

Also, they're selling Merch. That's a big difference.

I think Piper worked as an opponent because he felt like an outsider, someone beyond the typical WCW dynamic. It was apparent that nothing WCW could throw at the NWO would work and Piper was a wild card, someone from outside the system, someone who didn't care about the rules or the establishment. He shook up the board and that's always exciting in some ways.

We were very much on the same page with this one. It's a really great Casas performance.

Yeah, I've been holding off on this one because I'm still two Exiles behind, but I'll probably have to listen.

What I'm really excited for is Asuka and Bayley teaming up first.

i'm still playing catch up, but I'm looking forward to getting a better sense of Conway, Jr as a wrestler.

I got a kick out of the Mark Briscoe > Jumbo talk from last week's Exile, but it would have been even better if the talk about how good Bossman was that immediately followed it had been tied in.

If they are serious about making Reigns, feeding HHH to him in February would be the way to go. I think Hunter would veto that on the idea he had to look strong for whatever Mania match he has.

Throwing this out there: would people rather see Reigns vs Brock II or Reigns vs Cena at Mania?

They should absolutely get credit for doing something well. It's just not some sort of grand plan. There's also no reason to think that the next few weeks will go well based on history. Good on them for tonight though.

Props are due but it was a different crowd. That Rumble was mainly a travelling crowd.

"The Mike Jackson principle."

I'm too lazy to find the general lucha thread, so I'm tossing this here. I know what I'm watching tonight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDBb2s6nPiA

If they're going to go that route, have him fired or suspended off screen and not come out for a long opening interview segment. Then when he comes out at the end, the crowd wouldn't have seen him for the whole show and they'd be excited and ready to. I'd find him doing the Randy Savage sits in a chair in the middle of the ring and destroys people opening acceptable too.

His performances in matches is generally amazing. Being great in a match is not enough? Enough for #10? I think so. Enough for #1? I honestly don't know.

So if he comes out tomorrow night, they can use that as part of the build to a Rumble match.

Did I read somewhere that Brock was booked against Del Rio sometime in the next month?

Now if we get that and Brock vs Sheamus...

Cena vs Taker has to have some sort of stakes. I have no idea what, mind you.

The TLC concept is such a mess. We've already seen a crazy ladder spotfest, a thousand chairshots and a complete ECW style weaponfest. How little are the spots in this main event going to mean? How much less than if every other match on the card was wrestled straight?

I look forward to Ric turning on Charlotte for Bayley's heel turn that lasts five weeks in six months.