Loss Posted August 15, 2014 Report Share Posted August 15, 2014 Talk about it here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted October 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Last few minutes of a match that did little for me when I saw it in full. I liked the booking of Benoit and Malenko having to beat them back to back to win the titles, but not following through with that, especially when the passe Windham and Hennig are on the opposite side, is pretty bad. I do love Windham using the belt to pin Malenko. That finish is tremendous, but the match doesn't live up to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loss Posted October 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 I felt like I might be shortchanging this, so I watched it on the Network and it is better than I remembered it being - good match. I liked Tony getting over the "match of saves" story and Windham in particular was good at adding veteran touches and using the referee to their advantage. They crowd didn't get hyped for it, but I do think it was a solid match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Evans Posted January 10, 2015 Report Share Posted January 10, 2015 So I guess this was 2/3 falls? Clever finish by Windham. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soup23 Posted March 2, 2015 Report Share Posted March 2, 2015 Good action at finish of the first match even though the crowd doesn't care much. Second match really never gets going as Barry uses his belt to choke Malenko and win the tag straps for him and Hennig. Tim, this was a double elimination tournament and Hennig/Windham had 0 losses while Benoit/Malenko had one going in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteF3 Posted March 13, 2017 Report Share Posted March 13, 2017 A clever and well-done finish in a vacuum, but the result was so disheartening (at the time) that that aspect is hard to ignore. Not that this was a secret chance to save the company or anything, but putting the titles on Hennig & Windham in 1999 did absolutely no good. Benoit & Malenko *may* have been able to create another point of difference from the WWF and its de-emphasis on tag teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMJ Posted September 3, 2017 Report Share Posted September 3, 2017 Watched the full match today and I'd add that Benoit was really over with the crowd (and based on the video package that follows about the US Title - which he was number one contender for until he got screwed by the Outsiders - maybe at his peak of overness up until that point in his WCW career). Malenko seems half-interested in the match in his minutes, but Benoit is ferocious and giving his 100% and the crowd reacts well to him and Hennig tearing it up. Classic WCW too in that, weeks before, Flair had said that Bret Hart would have to defend the US Title against Benoit, but because of nWo shenanigans and Will Sasso interference, the US Title match we get instead at SuperBrawl IX is....Scott Hall vs. Roddy Piper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victator Posted September 3, 2017 Report Share Posted September 3, 2017 A clever and well-done finish in a vacuum, but the result was so disheartening (at the time) that that aspect is hard to ignore. Not that this was a secret chance to save the company or anything, but putting the titles on Hennig & Windham in 1999 did absolutely no good. Benoit & Malenko *may* have been able to create another point of difference from the WWF and its de-emphasis on tag teams. The WWF was pushing tag teams in this period. Anytime Barry Windham wins a belt I am happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryvonKramer Posted December 30, 2022 Report Share Posted December 30, 2022 Just watched this randomly and thought it sucked. Went way too long, Malenko botched a ton of spots, and somehow both Hennig and Windham in 1999 just seemed way off the pace. Weird to see stuff like this received **** at the time. This is a disjointed match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El McKell Posted January 1, 2023 Report Share Posted January 1, 2023 When you say it received **** at the time, can you clarify from who? I don't know who's star ratings from 1999 we can get a record of besides Dave Meltzer and he gave it *3/4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.