Bix Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Here's the ballot, comments to come in a reply... --- It's time for the 2014 Hall of Fame elections. This ballot is being sent out to major wrestling stars, past and present, major management figures in the industry, writers and historians. If you are getting this, you are being asked your opinion on who should be inducted into this year's Hall of Fame class. The criteria for the Hall of Fame is a combination of drawing power, being a great in-ring performer or excelling in ones field in pro wrestling, as well as having historical significance in a positive manner. A candidate should either have something to offer in all three categories, or be someone so outstanding in one or two of those categories that they deserve inclusion. The names listed below are those under consideration for this year. To be eligible, a performer must have reached their 35th birthday and completed ten years since their debut as a full-time performer, or be someone who has been a full-time pro wrestler for at least 15 years. Longevity should be a prime consideration rather than a hot two or three year run, unless someone is so significant as a trend-setter or a historical figure in the business, or valuable to the industry, that they need to be included. However, just longevity without being either a long-term main eventer, a top draw and/or a top caliber in-ring performer should be seen as relatively meaningless. The election is broken down into a number of categories. You should check each category for wrestlers that you feel you are familiar enough with based on geography that you've either traveled or are familiar with, and based on the time you have followed pro wrestling. You do not have to vote for a wrestler in every category you've checked. The ballot is also broken down to wrestlers and those who are not pro wrestlers but have been valuable parts of the industry. The maximum number of wrestlers that you can vote for all the categories is ten. You can pick as few as zero if you don't believe anyone on this list deserves inclusion. For wrestling executives, managers, announcers and other outside the ring performers, you can vote for them and they are not counted against the ten. You can vote for as many as five of them. All responses are confidential. There is nothing to worry about politically about any involvement in this process. Your selections will not be revealed unless you choose to do so yourself. Anyone who receives mention on 60% of the ballots from the geographical region and time frame (broken down as Continental United States & Canada; Mexico; Japan; Europe; and Hawaii/Australia/New Zealand) will be added to the Hall of Fame in the class of 2014. If you are unfamiliar with any of the candidates due to geography of having never seen them, that is fine. Ballots are sent to many people from all over the world and from different wrestling cultures so that everyone has as fair a shot at possible. The breakdown for modern and historical performers is 30 years ago, or 1984. So if the last year the person was a headliner, or was a key figure in the industry, was prior to 1984, they would be in the historical class. All performers who receive mention on 10% to 59.9% of the ballots from their geographical region or era will remain on the ballot for consideration next year. All those who receive less than 10% of the vote will be dropped from next year's ballot. They can return in two years based on if there is significant feedback from voters who say they will vote for them. This is mostly for wrestlers who are still active who may improve their career legacy, but can be for retired wrestlers if voters believe they should be put on or returned to the ballot. In addition, in following the lead of the baseball Hall of Fame, which is the model here, starting this year we have a 15-year-rule. The following candidates have been on the ballot since 2000. In baseball, this would be their last year of eligibility. Here, if they don't get at least 50% of the votes in this year's election they will be removed from the ballot. If they are modern candidates, they can be brought back in the historical performers era in two years if it is more than 30 years since their career as a Hall Fame level performer is up: The following candidates will be dropped from next year's ballot unless they are elected in or garner 50% of the vote: Gene & Ole Anderson Cien Caras Carlos Colon Gran Hamada Volk Han Owen Hart Gorilla Monsoon Fabulous Moolah Pedro Morales Dick Murdoch Rock & Roll Express Seiji Sakaguchi Jimmy Snuka Wilbur Snyder Jesse Ventura Please return this ballot by October 5th. You can e-mail the ballot back to [email protected] or fax it to 408-244-3402 or mail (please do so by September 28th) to Wrestling Observer, P.O. Box 1228, Campbell, CA 95009-1228. Please check by every category you are familiar with I FOLLOWED THE HISTORICAL PERFORMERS ERA CANDIDATES Gene & Ole Anderson The Assassins (Joe Hamilton & Tom Renesto) Red Bastien June Byers Pepper Gomez Dick Hutton Pedro Morales Ciclon Negro Kinji Shibuya Wilbur Snyder John Tolos Enrique Torres Von Brauners & Saul Weingeroff Tim "Mr. Wrestling" Woods Johnny "Mr. Wrestling II" Walker I FOLLOWED THE MODERN PERFORMERS IN U.S/CANADA CANDIDATES Junkyard Dog Edge Owen Hart Curt Hennig Ivan Koloff Brock Lesnar Fabulous Moolah Dick Murdoch Ken Patera C.M. Punk Rock & Roll Express (Ricky Morton & Robert Gibson) Sgt. Slaughter Jimmy Snuka Sting Ultimate Warrior I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN JAPAN CANDIDATES Jun Akiyama George Gordienko Gran Hamada Volk Han Masahiko Kimura Satoshi Kojima & Hiroyoshi Tenzan Yuji Nagata Seiji Sakaguchi Mike & Ben Sharpe Minoru Suzuki Kiyoshi Tamura Akira Taue I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN MEXICO CANDIDATES Brazo de Oro & Brazo de Plata & El Brazo Cien Caras Hector Garza Ultimo Guerrero Karloff Lagarde Blue Panther L.A. Park Huracan Ramirez El Signo & El Texano & Negro Navarro Vampiro Villano III Dr. Wagner Jr. I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN EUROPE CANDIDATES Jim Breaks Big Daddy Giant Haystacks Horst Hoffman Billy Joyce Kendo Nagasaki Jackie Pallo Rollerball Mark Rocco Johnny Saint Otto Wanz I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN AUSTRALIA/PACIFIC ISLANDS/CARIBBEAN/AFRICA CANDIDATES Spyros Arion Johnny Barend Brute Bernard & Skull Murphy Carlos Colon King Kong Czaja John DaSilva Domenic DeNucci Killer Karl Kox Mark Lewin Mario Milano Jan Wilkens NON-WRESTLERS Bill Apter Dave Brown Jim Crockett Jr. Jim Crockett Sr. Gary Hart Jimmy Hart Howard Finkel Jerry Jarrett Larry Matysik Gorilla Monsoon Gene Okerluind Don Owen George Scott Jesse Ventura Stanley Weston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bix Posted September 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 So we have a new rule: Starting this year with wrestlers who have been on the ballot since 2000, if you don't go in within 15 years, you're off the ballot. If you're a modern performer, you can age out into  Also, Africa has been added to the weird catch-all "region," with Jan Wilkens on the ballot.  With the rule change and surprise additions I have no clue what my ballot is gonna look like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollinger. Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Another year left off the list. Thanks, Dave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Is there any argument for Monsoon as a promoter? Also what's the precedent of people getting in for combinations of things. Wrestler+Promoter+Announcer, etc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollinger. Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Actually, someone could probably just e-mail their ballot to Dave and he'd just count it. It's Dave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Waco Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I got a ballot this year which is cool, but the various changes to the ballot are going to make it WAY harder for me than it would have been last year. I understand the concept of capping the time someone can appear on the ballot, but the 50% threshold seems really high, and I am very concerned that the end result will be a lot of reasonable "borderline" candidates who are worth thinking about and doing more research on will be trimmed off, in lieu of a bunch of modern candidates that are clearly weaker but will have an easier go of it without the logjam. I do think some of the additions to the ballot that we weren't expecting are great, but it really does make it harder to pick where to vote, especially because the Lucha ballot is so deep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JNLister Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I can see the new rule causing more confusion for some voters. Say you've got 11 candidates you think HoF worthy and somebody, lets call him Dick Murdoch, is your 11th best candidate. Do you play it straight and vote for your top 10, or do you pick Murdoch because he's on the chopping board and somebody else in your top 10 is still going to be on the ballot next year if they don't get in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoe Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I'm always for the straight up method. Anything else seems shady even if your intentions are well meaning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W2BTD Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I can see the new rule causing more confusion for some voters. Say you've got 11 candidates you think HoF worthy and somebody, lets call him Dick Murdoch, is your 11th best candidate. Do you play it straight and vote for your top 10, or do you pick Murdoch because he's on the chopping board and somebody else in your top 10 is still going to be on the ballot next year if they don't get in? Â I'm voting for my top ten (or whatever number I end up voting for), with zero regard for who may fall off of the ballot. Those chips will just have to fall wherever they fall. Â At first I thought the 50% was a really high threshold, but then I thought about what this new wrinkle is based on, the Baseball HOF, and after the 15 (now 10) years, they kick you off regardless of your percentage, even if you only miss by a single vote. So dave is kind of being lenient here. You can stick around beyond the 15 if you are on the cusp. Â I could go either way on dropping guys after 15. The ballot was getting crowded, so I can see why it was implemented. And it's not as if people can't (and won't) be brought back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W2BTD Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Also, i'm pretty sure i'm responsible for getting King Kong Czaja added to the ballot, which means I should probably vote for him just to give me an excuse to vote for that ridiculously constructed miscellaneous region so I can finally vote for Colon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Waco Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I want to say I will only vote for my legitimate top ten, but this new rule might force my hand in a couple of ways. For example I was on the fence about voting in the lucha category, but I'm not willing to risk Caras falling off a ballot that includes Ultimo Guerrero, Hector Garza and Vampiro. So now I will definitely vote for Caras, BUT the problem is if I vote for him do I ignore the rest of the category? It seems insane to do that, when it is by far the deepest category on the ballot. So now I have to decide do I dump four or five votes into lucha (I could easily justify nine votes in that category), or just stick with the one guy in obvious danger? Â At this point the only people I am positive I will vote for are Colon, the RnR's, Caras, and Patera. Even guys who I had assumed would be virtual locks for me (Torres, Shibuya, Koloff) are harder to give a definite yes to, when you know they are taking away votes from a bunch of borderline/interesting guys who''s absence from the ballot will clear a path for your Edge's and Brock Lesnar's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Vote Sting! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W2BTD Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Rock n Roll Express are my one & only wrestler lock right now. Everybody else I voted for last year either got in, moved to a category I don't vote on, or I changed my mind (I have changed my stance on drawing in UFC when it comes to Brock being relevant to a pro wresting HOF, and without that, I don't think he's close to worthy yet). Â So I have nine spots open, and find myself seriously considering, conveniently enough, nine candidates. I doubt i'll end up going the full ten, though. Â I have four non-wrestler spots accounted for, with three candidates in play for the last slot, which I will likely use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dylan Waco Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Actually non-wrestler is the easiest category for me by far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 For Sting's appearance on the video game panel? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert S Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 There are some really horrible choices on the modern US/Canada list. Interesting to see Wanz on the list, as Meltzer before usually just laughed when the name came up w.r.t. the HOF. I am no Catch expert at all, but Georg Blemenschütz might be a better Austrian candidate for the Hall of Fame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funkdoc Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 los misioneros de la muerte feel to me like they should be a slam dunk. i would definitely be a bit strategic with my votes in something like this, though.  it's fun to think about this even if i don't have a ballot! i would currently be leaning:   colon, rnr express, cien caras, los misioneros, villano III, huracan ramirez, JYD, patera, the sharpes, big daddy   i tend to be interested in giving the older stars love. i think i heard there's a "veterans committee" for this HOF though, which would change things up a bit for me. jimmy hart & jerry jarrett would be my slam dunks for non-wrestlers, probably bill apter as well (since inducting the entire company doesn't seem like it would happen). leaning finkel & don owen for the last 2 since the crocketts seem safer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilclown Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 My initial thoughts  I FOLLOWED THE HISTORICAL PERFORMERS ERA CANDIDATES Gene & Ole Anderson Pedro Morales Johnny "Mr. Wrestling II" Walker I FOLLOWED THE MODERN PERFORMERS IN U.S/CANADA CANDIDATES Ivan Koloff Ken Patera Rock & Roll Express (Ricky Morton & Robert Gibson) I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN JAPAN CANDIDATES Volk Han Minoru Suzuki Kiyoshi Tamura I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN MEXICO CANDIDATES ABSTAIN I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN EUROPE CANDIDATES ABSTAIN I FOLLOWED WRESTLING IN AUSTRALIA/PACIFIC ISLANDS/CARIBBEAN/AFRICA CANDIDATES ABSTAIN NON-WRESTLERS Jim Crockett Jr. Jerry Jarrett Gorilla Monsoon George Scott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victory Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 What's been the overall consensus or knock for the RNR Express not being in the HOF yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W2BTD Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 What's been the overall consensus or knock for the RNR Express not being in the HOF yet? Â Ricky Morton not knowing the proper name for the O'Connor Roll. Â At least in the case of Colt Cabana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shoe Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 Â Â What's been the overall consensus or knock for the RNR Express not being in the HOF yet? Ricky Morton not knowing the proper name for the O'Connor Roll. Â At least in the case of Colt Cabana. Actually it was Robert Gibson according to Cabana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 The 15 year eligibility thing seems a bit haphazard. The way wrestling works, it's possible for a wrestler to become ineligible before he even retires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrisZ Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 One of the knocks on RnR were that they weren't "draws" which is ridiculous because they headlined a lot during the JCP heyday and drew big houses. Â Also another knock is that Morton is a HOF guy but Gibson isn't so he drags Morton down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt D Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 They popped Mid-South too, no? Â That's not just a myth right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NintendoLogic Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 Here's what Meltzer wrote about the R&R's HOF candidacies back in 2009:   Strengths: Top babyface tag team during the high point of both Bill Watts’ and Jim Crockett’s promotion. Although the Fabulous Ones were really the ones that sparked the genre in Memphis, it was the success of the Rock & Roll Express in 1984 in Mid South that caused numerous territories to come up with copies. While the gimmick made them stars, Morton is lauded as one of the great workers of his era, who turned the babyface in peril role into an art form. Not the top, but one of the stronger drawing tag teams in history and in their heyday had consistently good matches with anyone, and great matches when given top heel workers. For years, Rock & Roll Express vs. Midnight Express tapes were used to teach younger wrestlers how to work a tag team match.Weaknesses: While the two started teaming in 1983, and still team on occasion on the independent scene, the reality was they were the kind of an act that would be super hot for a year or two in a territory and start to burn out, similar to a teen heartthrob. They were together a long time, but longevity at the big-time level was relatively short, one year with Watts and a couple of years with Crockett. While they carried Smoky Mountain Wrestling for two years in the 90s, that was a small promotion. Their act was better for the territorial era where they probably would have been a hot act everywhere they went for years, and then could double back later in their career. They had the working ability and the influence, were draws, but the longevity as a top act is their main stumbling block. Some argue that because they were around during JCP’s national television era, they are remembered as the best babyface team, but arguments are they were never hotter nor lasted as long on top as Ricky Steamboat & Jay Youngblood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.