El-P Posted April 4, 2015 Report Posted April 4, 2015 Some interesting threads have already been bumped into the second page (where they'll be forgotten) because of useless threads like the AJ Lee one (or the Rusev one which is basically a pissing contest). Blah.
Grimmas Posted April 4, 2015 Report Posted April 4, 2015 Some interesting threads have already been bumped into the second page (where they'll be forgotten) because of useless threads like the AJ Lee one (or the Rusev one which is basically a pissing contest). Blah. You think a prominent performer retiring is not worth a thread?
WingedEagle Posted April 4, 2015 Report Posted April 4, 2015 Some interesting threads have already been bumped into the second page (where they'll be forgotten) because of useless threads like the AJ Lee one (or the Rusev one which is basically a pissing contest). Blah. You think a prominent performer retiring is not worth a thread? Not sure how one makes the case that any Diva since the Sable/Sunny era was prominent performer. The item is newsworthy, but I doubt it changes the landscape more than any number of angles on Raw each week. Certainly worth mentioning, but El-P's point is one I hadn't thought of but was sad to see in that it may very well relegate a number of discussions to the archives. How many of us make it go page 2 on a google search all that often, much less PWO?
goodhelmet Posted April 4, 2015 Author Report Posted April 4, 2015 At the bottom of the page, you can simply load more topics and it is right there at your convenience. Also, it is a noteworthy news item that generated 2 pages of discussion. There will be some growing pains early on but we knew that when we made the decision.
JerryvonKramer Posted April 4, 2015 Report Posted April 4, 2015 I think a "current" folder is increasingly warranted personally.
Strand Peanut Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 Bring back the megathreads. Current WWE was the best managed discussion about WWE out there. It may have not fit the intent of some, but it served it's purpose well. I thought it was a wonderful containment board. Locking two of the most popular threads on a message board.. without consulting the user base.. with no explanation in the thread.. and no evidence of some unholy flame war.. heh sure.. Hey, maybe it'll work. But you're not going to engender good will by operating this way.
Bigelow34 Posted April 17, 2015 Report Posted April 17, 2015 My opinions are not supported by Will and Charles. Or anyone...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now