Jump to content
Pro Wrestling Only

Reactions to the Honorable Mention List, Part 3


Grimmas

Recommended Posts

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

 

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

 

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

I just like my wrestlers I picked and want them to do as well as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I feel like we're about to lose a bunch of the guys that I would love to have in the 100 the most. The Christians and Larry Zs (and yes, Blackwells and Morgans). Subversive picks against the classical conventional wisdom but potentially deserving ones. But the top 115 is no small accomplishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sasuke is another one from my 2006 list that didn't make it this time around, I was never as high on him as others, although if I had rewatched his peak years maybe I would have included him. Lots of juniors/lucharesu guys didn't make my list.

I think all the luchaersu love went to Dick Togo, to be honest. I need to represent one and that is the dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

 

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

 

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

 

Depends who it is. I had Blackwell at No. 21, but I didn't honestly expect him to finish in the top 25. I was happy to see him crack the top 120.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think some of the griping and frustration is that there is a sense that the last 18 months of discussion was for "nothing," when results pop up that aren't representative of the discussion in the Nominees thread at all.

 

It does make for a better, broader more credible list in some ways.

 

Something like Malenko, though, where there was so much discussion over the last few years pulling him down from his pillar and barely any defense of him and that barely registering or mattering. There is a sense of "Well, what was the point if this was just going to be the result anyway," full of people who were obviously unfamiliar with the discussion or at the very least unmoved by it.

 

It only bothers me so far, but I can see how it could really bother someone else who was thoroughly engaged for months upon months in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Sasuke, think he was top fifty on my ballot. Someone who had a lot of great junior matches during a golden era of junior wrestling.

 

Amazed Christian will be so high, someone who I don't rate at all despite the heavy pimping that occurs for him in these parts. He always seemed so non threatening to me, with a poor look and no real star quality. His singles work was never more than solid to me, he could never get me to engage in him as worker outside of tags and multi man clusterfucks. Very much a solid midcard hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

 

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

 

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

I just like my wrestlers I picked and want them to do as well as possible.

Do you think it's possible people are taking things a lot more seriously than us at this point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Reveal schedule:

Sat, April 16: 119-110

Sun, April 17: 109-101

Mon, April 18: 100-91

Tue, April 19: 90-81

Wed, April 20: 80-71

Thu, April 21: 70-61

Fri, April 22: 60-51

Sat, April 23: 50-41

Sun, April 24: 40-31

Mon, April 25: 30-22

Tue, April 26: 21-16

Wed, April 27: 15-11

Thu, April 28: 10-6

Fri, April 29: 5-3

Sat, April 30: 2-1

My wife is due to give birth to our second son on April 28. Hopefully he's on time so he can take in the full top 10 reveal.

So basically you're naming him Ric, Stan, Terry or Jerry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

 

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

 

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

I just like my wrestlers I picked and want them to do as well as possible.

Do you think it's possible people are taking things a lot more seriously than us at this point?

 

Yes. Hence the silliest pictures I can find and the Triple H reveal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

 

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

 

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

I just like my wrestlers I picked and want them to do as well as possible.

Do you think it's possible people are taking things a lot more seriously than us at this point?

 

There are a few things I'm frustrated with. I get what's going on with lucha and even 5 or 6 in the top 100 will be a good thing, but the fact that WoS is down to 2 people left and likely only one of them making the top 100, an entire subgenre of wrestling, one with a ton of footage online for free, and so much of it so excellent and engaging, especially when we're in the midst of a revival that draws so much from it. That just seems messed up to me.

 

In general, we're just having fun, but I do think there's something not unreasonable to my previous post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Reveal schedule:

Sat, April 16: 119-110

Sun, April 17: 109-101

Mon, April 18: 100-91

Tue, April 19: 90-81

Wed, April 20: 80-71

Thu, April 21: 70-61

Fri, April 22: 60-51

Sat, April 23: 50-41

Sun, April 24: 40-31

Mon, April 25: 30-22

Tue, April 26: 21-16

Wed, April 27: 15-11

Thu, April 28: 10-6

Fri, April 29: 5-3

Sat, April 30: 2-1

My wife is due to give birth to our second son on April 28. Hopefully he's on time so he can take in the full top 10 reveal.

So basically you're naming him Ric, Stan, Terry or Jerry?

Hopefully Ric 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Reveal schedule:

Sat, April 16: 119-110

Sun, April 17: 109-101

Mon, April 18: 100-91

Tue, April 19: 90-81

Wed, April 20: 80-71

Thu, April 21: 70-61

Fri, April 22: 60-51

Sat, April 23: 50-41

Sun, April 24: 40-31

Mon, April 25: 30-22

Tue, April 26: 21-16

Wed, April 27: 15-11

Thu, April 28: 10-6

Fri, April 29: 5-3

Sat, April 30: 2-1

My wife is due to give birth to our second son on April 28. Hopefully he's on time so he can take in the full top 10 reveal.

So basically you're naming him Ric, Stan, Terry or Jerry?

Hopefully Ric 😀

Haha imagine! Huge congrats by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

I just like my wrestlers I picked and want them to do as well as possible.

Do you think it's possible people are taking things a lot more seriously than us at this point?

Probably because, while I do not think it was intended that way, listing the names of the Triple H votes came across like a very petty thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

One of those guys who talks about PWO a lot on Twitter but who doesn't post here said this:

Why do y'all want your ballots to have the most guys listed? To prove you are the woolliest of the sheep?#pwogwe

Just wondering how many people here feel that and how others might respond to that criticism.

I just like my wrestlers I picked and want them to do as well as possible.

Do you think it's possible people are taking things a lot more seriously than us at this point?

Probably because, while I do not think it was intended that way, listing the names of the Triple H votes came across like a very petty thing to do.

 

It was done for humour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not getting worked up over anyone's placement, just enjoying the ride that is the reveals. I am keeping track of how many wrestlers have dropped from my list as a pass the time thing while we march towards the top 100. It's irrelevant to me how many or few of the wrestlers from my list make the top 100, as long as I'm OK with the list I submitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...