The series seemed rather biased to me towards Bischoff's viewpoints. It glosses over how toxic the politics backstage were when it came to creating new stars. The decision to end Goldberg's streak is defended on the grounds that Goldberg was cooling off and he needed to go into chasing the title again, but no time is spent on how badly he was booked in the space leading up to his loss and afterwards. They mention Goldberg's title win over Hogan and Bischoff gets a chance to defend the decision to put it on network TV, but it's not brought up at all how Goldberg only got 1 PPV main event in the time between his title win and Starrcade.
The Millionaire's Club vs. New Blood storyline is also mentioned and defended, but the series doesn't bother going into why that storyline is badly remembered (crowd being expected to cheer for the old guys over the new guys). The claim that Turner was offloading expenses from their other properties onto WCW's balance sheet is repeatedly made with no evidence, but they also fail to mention all the ways that WCW actually was wasting money, doing things like a KISS concert.
The narrative that Jamie Kellner deserves all the blame for killing WCW remains highly suspect to me. Any kind of attempt from Bischoff to get time on a different network and why it didn't work out isn't mentioned at all. Can they honestly say that it would have been just as impossible for WCW to find a different network if they were still as successful as they were in 1998? If WCW's free fall ratings and buy rates played no factor at all, how could TNA have found a deal with Fox Sports a few years later, when wrestling was even less hot?