El-P

You mean worst that Paul Roma showing up ?

Funny stuff. The Dudz were all about promos and fun skits.

And people wonder why ECW seemed so fresh an appealing at the time ?

I enjoyed it. It's morbid ECW at its worst, but you can't deny it has a true bloodthirsty aura to it, and Axl was a good worker and good seller. Ok, it's guilty vampire pleasure, and it works only in this particular setting, but when I went through my ECW watch, I enjoyed this more than Eddie vs Dean. Go figure.

Candido and Tammy could make any stupid stuff fun, as showed here. I liked the gimmick too.

Just awful and embarrassing.

Am I the only one who thought Savio was a really good worker back then ?

Yeah, that was embarrassing how hard they pushed their humanitarian PR back then.

Awful match. Tatanka had become fat and lazy by this point. Diesel vs Sid was the worst feud of the year. Just god awful boring stuff. Bam Bam was so wasted in the middle of all this after doing a great job with L.T.

Awful feud. Talking about rotten feet, then going into evil dentist. Poor Bret. And no wonder Lawler was seen as a joke then.

Comedian. I rectified it 2 days ago when I said that, ok, she wasn't as great as Hase was at the same time. That's also part of my point. Considering her experience level in 1992, Yoshida was really a super worker. As great as Hase at this point ? No. But balancing the experience level between the two and the fact Yoshida wasn't supposed to have the great matches Hase was (as a junior then a heavy workhorse), I say the gap isn't that big, and certainly not big enough to put Hase above Yoshida on a career vs career scale. I don't know. I love NJ heavies from that time period, and Hase was great. Was Kyoko better ? Quite possibly. Sadly I never got to put up notes about 1993. I have tapes somewhere I bought from Lynch with about the entire year of joshi. I should rewatch this. That is, when I get done with WCW, and then the SMW I'm getting. And I'm planning of getting into older AJ & NJ stuff too eventually. Need time...

I would agree. Jannetty never showed more than during the mid 90's. I would say 93-95 would be a good period to define his peak, including his WWF matches with Michaels (the RAW ones), Doink, the tags with Waltman, the stuff in 95 against Candido & co. Well, I haven't seen much of Michaels from this era, but I would put Michaels peak during the Rockers days too actually, in the WWF (friom what I've seen), so it doesn't sound that far fetched to me to consider this. 1996 Michaels is ridiculously overrated, and I'd rather not talk about his comeback.

Well, she's my all-time favourite wrestler ever, so that too. That said, I was very surprised to discover that she ruled so much back in 92 when I did. I watched this with an open mind and not a "Yoshida will be the pearl of my joshi watch no matter what" mindset. I'm not saying she was the greatest wrestler in 1992. Kyoko, Oz, Aja, Bull, Hokuto, Kansai were clearly better. But was she better than Toyota ? Yes she was in my mind, no doubt about that, and that's after I watched most matches of the year, not before. Re-watching 1992/1993, I found Yamada very overrated as a worker, which surprised me. Some great performances, but uneven. Toyota wasn't that great in 1992 either. Kyoko vs Yoshida in 1992 >> Kyoko vs Toyota (speaking about that IWA title match). She had lot of very good and excellent matches in the year, more than just "nice matches". Yes, she was still young and not developped, but for her experience level and what she was working with in term of tool, I say she was excellent. if anything, to me she overachieved in 92. And she never had a match as horrible as the 40 minute draw that Toyota and Yamada had on 01/04. I dug up my old notes about 1992, and here are my 10 top singles matches : 1 : 11/26 Akira Hokuto vs Kyoko Inoue (22 :16) 2 : 08/15 Manami Toyota vs Toshiyo Yamada (19 :43) 3 : 07/05 Kyoko Inoue vs Mariko Yoshida (30 :00) 4 : 06/21 Mariko Yoshida vs Sakie Hasegawa (30 :00) 5 : 01/04 Akira Hokuto vs Kyoko Inoue (24 :54) 6 : 07/09 Mayumi Ozaki vs Dynamite Kansai (25 :11) 7 : 04/25 Bull Nakano vs Aja Kong (21 :40) 8 : 08/30 Kyoko Inoue vs Mariko Yoshida (15:22) 9 : 11/26 Bull Nakano vs Aja Kong (20:19) 10 : 06/21 Toshiyo Yamada vs Manami Toyota (26 :16) So yes, Toyota vs Yamada did pull out a miraculous match once. But overall, 2 Yoshida vs Kyoko matches and Yoshida vs Hasegawa abocve any other Toyota/Yamada matches. Yoshida vs Toyota during the Grand Prix was much worse than the Kyoko match, and that's not because of Yoshida but because Toyota just gets in autopilot mode instead of getting the best out of her opponent like Kyoko could. Yoshida was better than Toyota in 92, and there's no other way to look at things to me. Toyota/Yamada worked really well as a team, because it also hide their weaknesses, and they got some great tag team matches that year. But they also never were the best in any great match. Oz & Kansai were better. Kyoko & Aja were better. And you got Yoshida & Takako vs Hasegawa & Malenko as my third best tag match of the year, a bunch of youngins working way over their heads and having a fantastic match. WTF ?

1991.02.02 Arn Anderson & Barry Windham vs Brad Armstrong & Tim Horner Fuck storytelling and fuck playing your role right. Give me fast paced action with crisp and smooth execution, and these four can deliver that in spades. And for once a match that get some actual time, so it can develop into a legit great match. Seriously, this is the best tag match since the MX have departed. The face side lacks a bit in charisma, to say the least (it's so sad, Horner is such a strong worker otherwise), but Arn & Windham have enough facial expressions for the four of them. Arn's bumping, stooging and mannerism are at an all-time great, and Windham, despite getting a little bit fat around the waist, looks like a top 5 worker in the world. Shit finish aside (which at least protected the Lightning Express, keeping them from doing the inevitable job), this is the kind of match that reminds me why I love wrestling. Oh, and of course, everyone played there role more than well (duh), and the match made perfect sense to boot. (this needs to get in the 91 Yearbook.)

To me Triple H peaked in 1997. Angle peaked early, but he was never a super worker to me. Still, goofy Angle from 2000 beats the hell out of Super Serious Workrate Angle from the rest of his career. Owen got great super quick. AKINO (female wrestler from ARSION) got great super quick. Hiromi Yagi (female wrestler from JWP) got great rather quick. Tenryu... not so much. Peaked late.

Understood. But that wouldn't register as being a great wrestler, which I thought was the point.

Wait, what ? Being Miss Baba's favourite register as having a great career in Japan ?

The Saturday Night match was Scott Steiner walking over Flair in a sprint, Flair barely had any offense at all. At this point they were still on this idea that Flair was done as a main player. I wouldn't call either a good match, but at least the Saturday Night match accomplished something in making Scott look like a bonified monster. The Clash match was way too long for Scotty who had no clue how to work single for such a long stretch, and he was badly exposed as a guy who just wasn't ready. Of course technically it was also better because Flair could do more stuff, but in the end it just didn't click for me. In term of efficiency, the Saturday Night match was much better. It was also more exciting, with Arn DDTing Steiner only to have Rick steinerline Flair to even the score. So yeah, the Saturday Night match worked much better even though it was basically a Goldberg match.

Ric Flair vs Scott Steiner - Clash 14 - 1991.01.30 It was both good and bad. Bad because it was a Flair-by-number match to the point of stripping his opponent of his own identity, especially on offense. Scott worked like about any musclehead would against Flair, although no press slam which surprised me, doing requisite Flair spot like putting him in the figure-four, and doing zero suplexes before the final stretch. In a way you could argue that it was better to save the big spots for later in the match, as Scott at this point is basically a spot machine who throws people around with no rhyme, but it still never felt like you're watching Scott Steiner kicking Flair's ass like Scott Steiner should. Steiner was also awkward in spots, botching a few stuff in an embarrassing way, like this spot where they both should go over the tope rope that he couldn't execute along with Flair, so he had to basically throw himself out. And it was good because they worked a nice stretch to the finish, with Flair selling a Steiner suplex like it was hell, and building up the intensity to the last seconds depsite the obvious time limit draw finish. If the match allowed more Scott Steiner to work his own style early on, it could have been excellent. As it was, it felt by the number for a good while, and somewhat disjointed. Oh, and Flair short hair looked awful. Blame the Black Scorpion mask I guess.

I actually just witnessed a great exemple of that. Clash 14, in 91. Early in the card, Sting basically jumps above Butch Reed, who barely does a back body drop to avoid Sting, who goes flying over the tope rope to the floor. DQ. Really, Reed barely did anything but try to not get hit. In the main event, Flair is leaning on the ropes, Scott Steiner charges full speed and hits him with a clothesline which throws Flair over the tope rope to the floor, as expected. Ross shouts "Judgement call !!" Eh eh eh. What a bunch of bullshit.

And Takada was a shitty worker, I know the drill. I disagree. Yoshida, for her experience level and the spot she worked on the card, was excellent. She wasn't carried. She more than brought her share to the match. Now, I think Kyoko was a great fucking worker in 1992, and Yoshida was more than able to hang up with her. Yoshida was better than Toyota, Yamada, Hasegawa, Takako and plenty other. Yoshida was great working her own style, despite what the company did or not, from 1998 and on. She was great opposing Candy Okutsu in 98, and Candy didn't exactly worked like Fukawa. She was great against Asuka in 2002 too, and god knows I'm not a big fan of Asuka's style. Well, that says all there is to say there.

From watching it recently, I thought it was rather bad actually, and certainly Luger's worst big match in a long time. And it wasn't Luger's fault. Mark was just limited in what he could do outside of the realm of a squash match. Had a few nifty stuff, but nothing was coming together yet. As far as the Skyscrapper goes, the equation was simple : Dan Spivey worked, Sid sucked/Mark was doing one of two cool spots and that was it.

Worst ? Yoshihiro Takayama. Just a bad bad worker in UWF-I, and not particulary good in AJ before finding his ways.

Well, since I'm at it : Mariko Yoshida (super worker for 6 years even before she peaked in 98/99). Nobuhiko Takada (peaked in the mid 90's, already great as early as the mid-80's). Crazy statements I don't think so.

Ok, not as great, but not quite the gap some would think. Yoshida was already a superb worker as early as 1992, and after her injury, she made a comeback not missing a beat near workers like Toyota (who was peaking) and Hasegawa (peaking too). So let me rephrase this : Yoshida's peak >>> Hase's peak. Yoshida post prime >>> Hase's post prime. Yoshida before her prime = Hase before his prime. So yeah, while Hase's peak > Yoshida before her peak, there's not a lot of argument I can make for Hase overall. And I love both.